 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
i hate to say it but NATO provides stability.
at the same time though is a vehicle of US interests.
That's why it must be abolished and replaced by a euro only institution of the same focus.
I'm not against adopting any possible good things that can be american. i'm not british.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ranskaldan
|
 |
Beijing ~ Singapore ~ Toronto ~ All hail to the new Rome
Sep 2001
time: 00:22
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Then how come they've never fought and its the closest thing to a law in IR? |
That's because all of the important modern democracies (US, EU, Japan etc) are allied to each other. In addition, a lot of them have nukes and are afraid to use it on anyone (India comes to mind). That's what keeps the peace. "Democracy" helps, but it isn't the key deciding factor.
If we had democratic elections in both Israel and Palestine tomorrow, the war would continue anyway.
quote:
Originally posted by DinoDoc
Neither of the regimes you listed count as democratic by any reasonable definition. |
They were pushed into power, however, by popular support. That's precisely what democracy is about.
The truth is, nations usually fight wars with massive popular support, or else it becomes very hard to fight it. The popular support derives from demogogues swaying the masses, and nothing in democracy prevents that, at all.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970
time: 00:22
|
|
The truth is, nothing in "democracy" itself prevents wars from happening.
While true, the predominate balance in democracies is in favor of peace among democracies. In this instance, and even though I don't believe it, you could credibly say that the exceptions prove the rule.
"That's because all of the important modern democracies (US, EU, Japan etc) are allied to each other."
Do you think this is a coincidence?
Anyway, I would include India among the important modern democracies. Or at least a democracy of budding importance.
Last edited by DanS on 29-09-2002 at 03:13
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ranskaldan
|
|
Beijing ~ Singapore ~ Toronto ~ All hail to the new Rome
Sep 2001
time: 00:22
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by DanS
"That's because all of the important modern democracies (US, EU, Japan etc) are allied to each other."
Do you think this is a coincidence?
|
Yes.
US, UK and France were traditional allies against the German threat. After WW2, they built Germany and Japan into clones of themselves, which then became rich, dependent, and eternally grateful. This is pretty much why all of the important democracies are allied. An accident of history.
quote:
Anyway, I would include India among the important modern democracies. Or at least a democracy of budding importance. |
India has had its fair share of international disputes. The only reason why it didn't erupt into war with Pakistan recently was in fear of Pakistani nukes.
Thus, nothing in the Indian democratic system is preventing xenophobia and belligerence. Whether or not Pakistan is a democracy really isn't a factor.
Of course, there's also the case of Israel and Palestine - 2 populations willingly devoted to fighting each other. I doubt democracy would help much in this case - it might even put demagogues into power and make the situation worse.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ranskaldan
|
|
Beijing ~ Singapore ~ Toronto ~ All hail to the new Rome
Sep 2001
time: 00:22
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Lonestar
I'm sure that would be news to the Iraqis in 1980...right before they went to war with Iran (which didn't have that shabby of a well-educated middle class either) |
My point hasn't been that dictatorships can keep themselves from war; my point is that democracies can't.
A strong, well-developed middle class helps in preventing war, since a country or people with too much to lose won't risk losing it. But that is by no means a bulletproof guard against war. A nation will rise to defend itself from threats, real or perceived. Germany, after all, rose to defend itself against a falsely perceived Jewish and Slavic threat, and paid dearly for it.
(Hitler himself may have started the war for personal ambitions; but he could never have done it alone. His manipulation of the German people was based on the so-called "Slavic and Jewish threat", and the Germans believed this demagogue and followed him to war.)
Note that democracy doesn't come into the equation. Demagogues, as I have showed, help speed wars along, and democracy is a system of demagogues trying to both please the populace and keep each other in check. This doesn't always work out. Sometimes the population - especially an angry one - wants war, and the demagogues will go along, helping the vicious cycle feed itself.
Last edited by ranskaldan on 29-09-2002 at 05:17
|
|
| |
|
|
|
VetLegion
|
|
who will you vote in presidential elections?
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22.
Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
29-09-2002 01:16
Seriously though I cannot see us handling nukes in near future. Especially with the delicate "situation" in the south...
just look what they do to computer gamers. they make a bad name for balkans 
|