 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
CyberGnu
|
 |
of the Virtual Serengeti
Apr 1999 time: 05:22
|
|
Ned,
quote: BTW, Why is Sweden not part of NATO. Are you still neutral? |
Yep. During the cold war it made a lot of sense. Not sure it does anymore.
quote: CyberGnu, On the issue of negotiations, I think nothing can be resolved with only the Palestinians and Israeli's at the table. |
I agree completely. The US has to be there too, to put pressue on Israel and to guarantee the implementation of a treaty.
quote: I agree, that Arafat had no choice but to terminate negotiations because the RoR could not be resolved due to Israeli insistence that they also be compensated for property taken from Jewish refugees from Arab states.
|
Eh, do you realize what a slap in the face it is to the arabs when Israel insists that it is entitled to compensation? Israelis enjoy the highest standard of living in the ME...
As long as Israel insists on being compensated, there will be no deal. My guess is that Barak knew this very well at Camp David...
quote: This leads me to believe also that a prime motivating factor to Bush's actions against Saddam Hussein is that he, more than any other Arab, has no intention of making a peace agreement with Israel. |
Well, I think the prime motivating factor for Bush has nothing to do with the people of the ME, whether jews or arabs. Iraq happens to sit on 25% of the worlds oil reserves...
quote: If there is a moderate Arab regime in Bagdad, a peace agreement between the Arabs and Israel is possible. |
You think? I don't necessarily agree. Egypt has a moderate leader, but he still can't allow a deal like the one presented at Camp David, for fear of fullscale rioting.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Al'Kimiya
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
BTW, Why is Sweden not part of NATO. Are you still neutral? |
We're ruled by socialists....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Al'Kimiya
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CyberGnu
Alkis, are you swedish? |
Ja, och nykterist ;P
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
quote: It is almost as if the Arabs or someone were deliberately blocking Palestinian integration. |
No one gives a **** about the Pals, Israeli or Arab.
Both sides are wrong in this but in many ways the Arabs seem worse to me. They claim that the Pals are their Muslim brothers, but then they continue to let the Pals live in squalid refugee camps for cynical reasons. The Pals are just a tool in the eyes of the Arab states, a tool to be used to weaken Israel. Israel's treatment of the Pals isn't any better, but at least the Pals are an enemy of Israel. The Arabs claim that the Pals are their friends, but they still continue to oppress them. With "friends" like these, who needs enemies? Unfortunately, the Pals have both... |
Damn right Drake: The neighboring Arab states, specially Syria and Lebanon treat the Palestinians horribly, as do the Gulf Sates. This is also why I never refer to the current conflict as Arab-Israeli but Israel-Palestinian. for all the hubub, the Egyptians, Saudis, Syrians, Iraqis and so forth are really barely involved- even in sending money to Hamas their influence is, as should be based on their treatment of the Pals, minimal, unlike what so many Israelis on the irght want- so that it becomes Arabs v Israel, not Palsetinians v Israel.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CyberGnu
|
 |
of the Virtual Serengeti
Apr 1999 time: 05:22
|
|
Ned, they are not actually blocking intergration, they just wont actively support it.
Actively supporting intergration would entail giving away land, houses, social services etc etc to the refugees. There is, AFAIK, no practical obstacle for a refugee to settle in jordan, as long as he can afford it.
There is quite a bit of mobility in the camps, as well. People who do well move out, while poor move in. See, for example, this norwegian study:
http://www.fafo.no/ais/middeast/jor...es/AmmanRWG.pdf
This aspect has always baffled. Why is the arab world vilefied because they wont pay for Israels crimes?
Let's say that the US decides to drive all blacks over the border to Mexico. Should we not only expect Mexico to shoulder the burden of integrating them into mexican society, but even accuse Mexico of a crime if it doesn't?
It seems absurd to me...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|