 |
|
kolpo
|
|
We have gained a lot of the money(maybe even more) we invested in Spain back from increased trade with Spain because of it's growing economy. Just like the US got's more money back from increased trade with Europe then the cost of the Marshall plan.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:22
|
|
"Landgrabs are so 20th century....
Anyway, that geography comes at a price. I have to say, it takes a bit of getting used to the idea that the EU would share a border with Syria, Iraq and Iran...."
Landgrabs are timeless.
Admitting Turkey would make the EU a middle eastern and Asian power to be reckoned with, at a minimal cost in military hardware. Nowadays, the EU's interests aren't taken into account in the region.
Last edited by DanS on 10-10-2002 at 20:30
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:22
|
|
"*Looks at site of of old Twin Towers.*"
Clever, but it doesn't hold. The Twin Towers were said to be because of what the US had to do to become a power broker in the region--basing and the like on holy ground (oddly, I think we can understand this complaint very well). Not the fact that we were the power brokers. The EU w/Turkey wouldn't have those problems.
"And Turkey has to be an EU member to get the oil and gas into the other member states ?"
No, of course not. But securing Turkey for your side puts you in a much better position.
"So we should by efforts of foreign policy subsidize oil companies in order to become more dependent on an unreliable source of energy ?"
Yes, but would you cut down on the compound sentences, please? Natural gas is an excellent and reliable source of energy (Saudi Arabia, Qatar). Oil is a convenient source of energy, even though reliance on it should wane over time.
"I don't think that's really the case."
The only way France has the heft is to piggyback on EU institutions. This is fine, but consider that the EU isn't very well respected in the region because its countries no longer have military hardware there.
"Oil companies shall go find their business elsewhere."
It doesn't really work that way. There is a huge amount of oil and natural gas in the Gulf region. If you don't find the business there, your business is going to be working in more marginal places.
"I fail to understand why are you are such an ardent supporter of the nannystate."
For energy, it's necessity borne of experience.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Roland
|
 |
Auf'm Jahrmarkt :(
May 1999 time: 06:22
|
|
"No, of course not. But securing Turkey for your side puts you in a much better position."
A better position for what ?
"Yes, but would you cut down on the compound sentences, please?"
I try. Just be glad we don't conduct this conversation in german.
"Natural gas is an excellent and reliable source of energy (Saudi Arabia, Qatar). Oil is a convenient source of energy, even though reliance on it should wane over time."
Well the reliability problems are political.
"This is fine, but consider that the EU isn't very well respected in the region because its countries no longer have military hardware there."
Military hardware only wins you contracts in "liberated" Kuwait and occupied Iraq.
"If you don't find the business there, your business is going to be working in more marginal places."
And ?
"For energy, it's necessity borne of experience."
I'd prefer resources be used in a way that is profitable without state backing. If we can't get to the oil, get it somewhere else. If you can't, use other sources. Or should we intervene in say China to get access to their insurance market ?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|