 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:23
|
|
Mefody, Heresson, M e F o d y.
Nah, those two weren't angels. They were humans. So, version about two fallen angels is more likely.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
XarXo
|
 |
of the "I agree"
Jul 2000 time: 05:23
|
|
Woah, I'm with this , a similar reaction happened with my *terrible* Crown of Aragon thread.
Ignore them Cian McGuire, a "civ" only can exists if:
1.- Is far from a powerful-today one (why they doesn't include the "small" and "powerless" SIAM??? or ANGKOR WATT??? Answer: Too near from India, and not an european one! Why they included Iroquois? No comments...),
2.- Is a western european one (sorry, your civ is in the "commies" *sorry* "russians").
3.- The players have an high amount of bills to spend in stores for the games (If Centroafrican Republic were a rich and powerful country, don't doubt for a centroafrican civ!!!)
4.- The history doesn't matters. Is a game! (true answer: No gold? No civ!)
5.- And, *at the end*, the civs for "full the map" must be in the anglosaxonian history as a big (??) enemy, note that: Indian, Iroquois & Zulu. Are perfect for full the map, but... What about with: Thai, Khmer, Incans, Mayans, Ghana, Ethiopians, or simply renaming Zulus for Shona??
THESE ARE THE TRUE REASONS, so... Just learn 3D Studio and Civ III mod creation 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Heresson
Your last sentence isn't true and makes your entire speech obsolete.
The Vikings built your state, so don't boast with it. |
Could you prove it? What is the definition of state in your opinion?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Gangerolf
official language? well the vikings spoke "viking" for several generations before they merged with the slavs. |
Could you prove it? I guess you'll make a big faivor for history as science if you make it, because afaik there were no state documents, treaties, etc. which were signed on Viking language in Kiev Rus.
quote: I agree. Russia consisted of several independent khaganates and states at that time, and only two of them were set up by Vikings (Novgorod and Kiev). The Great Russian state came at a later point. |
Those two Novgorod and kiev weren't founded by Vikings (Varyags as we call them) too. Can you give me a single evidence that Novgorod or Kiev were founded by Vikings?
I guess no.
Btw, thanks for support
Last edited by Serb on 07-12-2002 at 19:41
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:23
|
|
A whole bunch of Russian and not only Russian historians thinks otherwise. This debate between followers of 'Normanism' and its foes continues for years. And none of the sides provided strong enough evidences to 100% or dis-prove this theory afaik.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by XarXo
Slavs... This sounds like call to all northern mediterraneans as "Romance". There's something bigger than a language between these countries? |
Our religion.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|