 |
|  |
 |
|
Bloody Monk

|
 |
austin, tx
May 2001 time: 23:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Straybow
Ahem: you may notice that I did pillage most of their irrigation and cover most of the land tiles aroung Tlatelolco and some around other cities. |
Stray,
What I noticed was that food was not important to deny; just shields. And not a little at a time. Get the invasion force gathered and then, all in one turn, cover his shield tiles. Like a denial of service attack, you will have shut down his 'server.' I brought a boat over from that nearby hut village about 12 clicks SE of the Aztec 'sphere of influence' to cover the backside areas on the other coast.
The one unit left (from the shield of the city hall) will still require 6 to 8 vet crooks, IIRC. The vet cats will make it go faster. I also gave some thought as to the order of the cities to attack and the best squares to make the attack from so as to be best able to move on to the next target.
In cracking Tlat' and Tex' I think I mustered 43 units. Non-vets work fine in the denial of service role, but, they die uselessly if pressed to attack walls. And attacking in dribs and drabs was not very pretty either. I did some of that too, before I had the brainstorm to besiege them.
It may not have been filled with glory, but still and all considered, I think it was a pretty good tactic.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Bloody Monk

|
 |
austin, tx
May 2001 time: 23:23
|
|
Stray,
Excellent site!! Thanks for the link. My memory of the quotation was actually better than I could hope.
There is another quote (that I won't get exactly) to the effect that "if I knew I was going to live so long, I would have taken better care of myself."
No, I was not saying "that", with 1:4. Maybe it was kinda lame, certainly confusing. And I took the 'ratio' to be a literary device, as I don't claim to know the actual numbers. In any case, my lack of clarity also warrants your construction.
Patton accepted losses of "4:1" in winning.
Custer inflicted the ultimate loss ratio on his own men; it simply doesn't matter how many Souix he killed.
It just seems to me that because Custer managed to get everyone killed, you could say he only killed one Souix for every four men he squandered. It's the same ratio, yes; but, derisive. I tried to put the emphasis on what a pathetic, wasteful tactic Custer blundered into. ( Turns out he was facing around 7,000, better armed, battle hardened, highly motivated and better led opponents.)
And to me the parallel to the game is striking. Because Custer's tactic makes about as much sense as throwing twelfth century crooks at eighteenth century musketeers behind walls...IMHO.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|