 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
-Jrabbit
|
 |
of the Electronic Egyptians
Feb 2002 time: 23:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Straybow
:Hmmm: Pisa? Melbourne? I hate the default "extra city" names. |
Yeah, sorry. I meant to rename those to be more in alignment with our oh-so-clever "system."
quote: BB = Battleship, DD = Destroyer, CL = Cruiser. Why not CR? I dunno, that's just what the USN uses. What does the Brit Navy use? |
Thanks for clarifying. Didn't know this was a real-world reference...
quote: BMonk, no Dips if there is no legitimate need for Embassy |
FYI that dip was inherited. Didn't know if I was required to disband him or not...
quote: Dem?? No, we need Metallurgy for Cannon to assault the walled cities! Oh well. Cancel the tour and put them eggheads back to work. |
Why bother?
MORE RABBIT NOTES --
1. Dallas is on the 2do list, too, Monk. But once we overrun New Orleans, I expect it will be right there for us. Shouldn't require a major expeditionary force -- just the leftover crusaders from the assault on NY.
2. Are we locked into 1750 as earliest possible win, or can we win earlier by taking all civs out in the same turn? I assume the AI will flash the victory video if we can do that.
3. Agree re assessment of STYOM's savagely simple, insightful ruleset. This has been a blast! 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Bloody Monk

|
 |
austin, tx
May 2001 time: 23:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by -Jrabbit
MORE RABBIT NOTES --
1. Dallas is on the 2do list, too, Monk. But once we overrun New Orleans, I expect it will be right there for us. Shouldn't require a major expeditionary force -- just the leftover crusaders from the assault on NY.
2. Are we locked into 1750 as earliest possible win, or can we win earlier by taking all civs out in the same turn? I assume the AI will flash the victory video if we can do that.
3. Agree re assessment of STYOM's savagely simple, insightful ruleset. This has been a blast! |
-Jrabbit,
1. Sorry that my poorly worded statement was misunderstood, Rabbit. In trying to be brief, I left the impression that you might have overlooked Dallas. I was, instead, trying to imply a greater degree of difficulty in locating Dallas.
2. Very good question!!
The actual dateline for respawning is 1500a. I should have paid more heed to the "IIRC" part of DaveV's mention of the 1750 date, previously on p.7. He was trying to indicate some uncertainty and I should have asked for clarification.
I would still be in a state of misconception if not for an accident in typing. I had all the Civ's ready to take in 1750, and was just biding my time, when an errant twitch sent a unit into the empty Rhodes in 1730. My horror turned to laughter (way too much Christmas 'cheer' while playing) when there was no respawn. So I swept the board a little earlier than planned.
Hopefully, SG[1] will see this before playing and not be misled by my earlier post
The new plan: Find 'em, Sack 'em, Drink more wine to celebrate.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Bloody Monk

|
 |
austin, tx
May 2001 time: 23:23
|
|
Hi guys,
One of the things about this particular game that made it so interesting is the ruleset. It requires one to think outside the box of our usual gameplay. Especially not being able to use dips as temporary duty combat engineers to take down walls. Some of our habits make it harder for us and, therefore, easier for the AI.
1) Why build muskets for garrison duty?? 20 muskets = 30 horses...or 20 horses + 5 crooks...or + 4 crooks + 1 caravel.
2) "do not attack until ready!"
Yeah, well, sometimes. We have so often derided the stupid AI that we forget that it sometimes does the right thing. Like building city walls while we get ready.
Reduce them to size one so they build units rather than walls. Even if we lose a few units, we can replace them. The AI can't. Time, or more properly, tempo is a battlefield element, too.
3) Getting locked into a mindset causes missed opportunities.
It never occurred to me to use Explorers (or wandering dips). I never build Explorers. Also, I got so caught up in the "total war" aspect of the game that I forgot, for a long time, to ask for maps.
4) There is one more element which was key to my game but, for now, I'll just say, "think outside the box." I don't want to be a spoiler.
The Monk thinking about doing a replay from 1480 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|