 |
|  |
 |
|
Colon
|
 |
Antwerp, Colon's Chocolate Canard Country
Jan 1970 time: 06:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sten Sture
That part is not necessarily true, depending on how you interpret 'one-time'. When a mortgage is refinanced at a lower interest rate, the monthly payment is less, allowing consumption to be increased for a perpetual period. Unless all of the refinanced mortgages were structured to have the same payment amount with a shorter term, or large cashout and similar term. |
When, a refinancing is used to increase debt without increasing interest payments the increase is one-time by all means.
However, when a refinancing is used to decrease the interest payments the increase is one-time as well in a (important) sense. For instance, by refinancing my mortgage one decreases it's annual payments by $2000 to $8000, allowing a 5% increase in his annual consumption spending from $40,000 to $42,000. The year after he'll still be able to spend $42,000, but he can't increase it again by 5% unless he manages refinance his mortgage again on more favourable terms.
That's what I mean when I say that consumption expenditures won't get a further boost from mortgage refinancing even if rates and real estate prices stay put.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
Sten:
"I would contend that the gains in US productivity were only indirectly because of the technology improvements, but were due to job cuts in the manufacturing and service industries"
If you trust the data (I expect them to be revised down as usual, but the trend should stay) we've seen an uptick in US productivity growth through the mini recession. Looks more like US companies took on some fat during the boom time.
"In reality, the technology and telecom industries did enjoy some productivity improvements, but the source of the spectacular gains in worker productivity came from industries whose relative stock performance was falling behind the hyperappreciation of rapid growth companies."
I think after the last revisions we're back to Gordon's initial assessment: The acceleration of productivity growth goes back to the funny accounting in computers. And that's it.
"Value stock companies, representing a much larger portion of domestic production than growth companies, were enjoying decent top-line sales growth, but were having difficulty expanding bottom-line margins enough to attract capital at the same level as the small hyper-growth companies."
About everyone borrowed like crazy. GM and Ford have a huge debtpile. That they bought back stock doesn't change that - they could have issued equity, could they not?
"If the Fed had kept money tighter during this time, it may have discouraged borrowing by value companies"
More importantly, there's a good chance it would have reduced consumer spending and the current account deficit.
"Are we just that inefficient with our delivery, and if so why can't we get it right?"
Well one obvious problem is the lottery. Another one may be the anarchic structure of US healthcare with all kinds of government meddling (also on the tax side). Another one is that doctors have to pay for their med school education, while in most european countries the government funds that up front, so it doesn't show up in health spending. Another one might be the price regulations on pharmaceuticals. Well, might be able to think of others....
Dan:
"I heard figures up to $140,00/year from high school friends who went into health care. I guess it depends on what specialty you're in."
Heard about similar amounts, and that some doctors already refuse to perform the more lawsuit-risky treatments. Excellent result...
GP:
"It was actually a pretty fluffy article.... Some guy from the bank in Texas."
Sounds like McTeer. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"They'll work themselves out."
And take your productivity increases, if there are any, with them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
I asked Ming to close the account. Wanted a new username, just so, also got a new one at CG....
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|