 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Felch X
Sex is free fun for the poor, jimmy. |
But Che is a Communist...Good God, they're not breeding are they?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:23
|
|
I notice that Congress didn't forget to pass themselves a $4,000 a year pay raise before they left, though.
Verto, Felch X is correct, having an internet connection is vital for me. I'm a web designer, and I do free stuff in my down time to keep busy. Also, I look for work all around the country, which just isn't possible with the Florida Times-Union. It would cost three bucks a day to take the bus over to the unemployment office to use the computers there to look for work, which adds up to about $60 a month, provided I look every day, which I do.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
And besides who would trust a Communist enough to have unprotected sex with them?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:23
|
|
quote: Uh, Davy-wavy, you might want to get out and see how da big ol' world works before you spout your knee-jerk ideological pablum. |
Oooh you used a big word 
quote: The simple answer to your rhetorical question is the vast majority of voters don't give a dead rat's ass about your philosophy of government, and they elect officials who are more responsive to what they want.[/quoted]
Granted.
[quote](a) Employers pay both federal and state unemployment taxes. Nobody else pays them. |
The person or entity who pays the taxes is not important. The fact that they are forced to pay them (to me) is.
quote: (b) The amounts they pay are trivial. (typically $252.80 per employee per year for state unemployment insurance, and $56.00 per employee per year for FUTA.) I'm an employer. I pay it, and it's nothing compared to the rest of my costs of doing business. |
Again, not the point. It's the issue of coercion.
quote: (c) The money from both state and Federal unemployment taxes is deposited in trust funds to be used solely for unemployment benefits. |
OK, but rather than pay it out in unemployment I'd rather see it returned to the companies who were forced to pay it.
quote: (d) Despite the low level of funding per employee per year, these trust funds are rolling in dough. The feds have $25 billion, last I heard, the state of California has about 5 billion. |
See above.
quote: (e) In just about every year, both Federal and state trust funds run positive balances, so they are in no danger of running low of money. |
See above.
quote: (f) Even from an employer's perspective, I'd rather pay the trivial amount of tax and have people between jobs be at least semi-liquid (i.e. spending money and circulating it in the economy, not with their head in a bottle.) |
Great. I'm glad you take that position. You should then be able to voluntarily elect to contribute whatever amount you like.
quote: Oh, and Floyd: If you wonder why people don't "debate" points or bother in depth with your posts, look in the mirror. |
Really? I generally respond point for point.
quote: Far more often than not, you're more concerned with spouting your ideology than with understanding the factual basis underlying any issue - just like this "if your gonna argue blah blah blah entitles you to any of my money, when you've never paid a dime of ****ing unemployment tax anywhere, at any time. |
Great, but the point is - and everyone knows that this is the point - that I don't really care who is being taxed. I only care about the existence of the tax itself. In that context, facts such as who pays it are irrelevant.
quote: JT's point wasn't condescending at all. |
Oh sure it was, in that it implied his ideological position had more merit because of "real world experience". That's bullshit - an ideological position can be right or wrong, but "real world experience" has nothing to do with that basic rightness or wrongness (at least, experience in the context he meant).
quote: There's this real live thing in the world called "experience." The fact that you can type and rant doesn't mean your point of view has any relevance or credibility, any more than if you were an eight year old. |
See above.
quote: In general (with the rare exception of the 30 year old ****up trust fund kid still living off daddy's estate), people who've been adults for a while know more about how that world works than people who haven't. Don't like it? TFB, that's the way things are. |
See above. The way the world works has little relevance to what is right and wrong, in many cases.
In light of that, the only way one is going to refute my position is by attacking the basis of that position. To date, loinburger is the only one who has done so, and he presented many good arguments. In the end, though, it's a pointless debate because he and I fundamentally disagree on what a state of nature is.
Point being, don't try to use "real world experience" to attack my position - "real world experience" has nothing to do with right and wrong.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
NeOmega
|
 |
Play Pentagenesis Beta!
Feb 2002 time: 21:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Japher
The reason so many ppl are on unemployment right now, and the reason they are demanding extensions, is because they (the unemployed) all feel (a generalization) that they are too good to take those jobs that we (those who would clean a toilet) have been forced to take in order to support our families, pay our bills, and hopefully have enough money to buy a Swanson's T.V. Dinner for the whole gang at Christmas.
The harsh reality of it is, there are jobs to be had, and they do not pay enough so that the new Mercades won't get repo'd. Oh well!! Sucks for you, that's my attitude. You lived above your means for way too long, and now you must pay.
I personally, live below my means so much, that if I was fired today I would not have to make a change in my life style for at least 1 year, and I wouldn't even have to go on unemployment. And, so you know I don't get paid a whole lot.
You reap what you sew. I am sorry that all the pseudo-rich yuppies with ties in Washington didn't get what they want. Wha! Sell your damn house for what's worth, trade in your mercades for a Honda, and I guess the day at Spago's with have to be cancled.
I am sure this is a generalization, but I live in the heart of the Silicon Valley, and I see it. Heck, my negihbor is on unemployment, hasn't looked for a job in 6 months, just bought a Harley, and has the nerves to complain that he can't get unemployment until his Compensation Package runs out. What a schmuk.
It is ppl like this that really give the ppl who need a job, and need unemployment to help them, a bad name.
The underlining point is that unemployment insurance is just way too easy to exploit, and is therefore a bad system that should be eliminated all together. |
PREACH ON Brutha JAPHER!!!
I have said this in another thread, but I live in the State with the highest unemeployment. Getting a job is easy, easy. Getting a $16 an hour job (WA average) is not.
I am sorry all your cheap expensive University degrees aren't getting you all squat, but, this is the real world, and economic times are tough for corporations, and they cannot afford to hire on a bunch of people to see who works best.... that's what the nineties were for, an economic summer.
Now is an economic winter. The superfluous must be let go. The strong will survive.
The company I am working for is booming. 15% growth per annum. Of course we are but lowly carpet cleaners.
A web graphics designer?
Time to get yourself a job at Safeway. The Chevron Station was a fun job too. There are way too many web graphics designers out there.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by David Floyd
Again, not the point. It's the issue of coercion.
|
Nobody is coerced into being an employer, or to do business in any particular state or the United States. If one wants the opportunity to do business in certain markets, there are associated costs. If was doesn't want to pay those, then one doesn't have to.
quote:
OK, but rather than pay it out in unemployment I'd rather see it returned to the companies who were forced to pay it.
|
Companies actually don't mind. It's a very cheap way of stabilizing employment in uncertain times, because if employees knew they were SOL the moment a company dropped the axe, they'd be spending far more of their time sending out resumes and posting on monster.com than they would working.
quote: Great, but the point is - and everyone knows that this is the point - that I don't really care who is being taxed. I only care about the existence of the tax itself. In that context, facts such as who pays it are irrelevant. |
There's your context, and then there's the relevant context of how the world actually operates and what it's effects are. 
quote:
Oh sure it was, in that it implied his ideological position had more merit because of "real world experience". |
Ideology without interest in "real world experience" is the sort of blind fanatacism of folks like the Taleban, Stalin, the Hitler Jugend, Earth First!, etc. You get my drift: "**** how the world actually works, all we care about is the little philosophical fantasy world inside our minds."
quote:
That's bullshit - an ideological position can be right or wrong, but "real world experience" has nothing to do with that basic rightness or wrongness (at least, experience in the context he meant). |
Ideology with no basis in external reality and experience is neither right nor wrong - it is irrelevant. Just a form of mental masturbation for the ideologues, who generally live in their fantasy world because they'd be powerless otherwise.
quote:
See above. The way the world works has little relevance to what is right and wrong, in many cases.
|
The way the world works is the only thing which is relevant.
quote: In light of that, the only way one is going to refute my position is by attacking the basis of that position. To date, loinburger is the only one who has done so, and he presented many good arguments. In the end, though, it's a pointless debate because he and I fundamentally disagree on what a state of nature is. |
That's like CivNation saying "the only way you can refute my arguments is from my interpretation of the Bible."
Your position is "refuted" by the simple fact that it's a meaningless exercise in fantasy. The world doesn't funtion on six billion individual sets of "it should be this way"
quote: Point being, don't try to use "real world experience" to attack my position - "real world experience" has nothing to do with right and wrong. |
Right and wrong are personal abstract concepts. Next thing you know, you'll be talking about some creative fictional exercise like "natural rights" or "sovereignty"
Thanks for reminding me of a new line for my signature, though. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:23
|
|
quote: Nothing in the Constitution specifies the form of a declaration, or defines what one is. There's nothing about using the words "war" or "declaration" either. As long as Congress authorizes the action, that's all it takes. |
Sorry. The clear intent of the Constitution is that Congress must declare war before we can take military action, to say nothing of the clear intent of the Founders.
But that's for another thread, don't you think?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shi Huangdi
|
 |
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 1999 time: 00:23
|
|
"Again, another whole thread misrepresentating the right-wing posted by an inherently misled leftist. I have nothing to say to you, chegitz.
------
To make myself look good. (in response to why he posted in this thread)
------
Uh no. You failed.
------
Or just follow the USSR (Commie) system: No unemployment. Those who were unemployed were either thrown into gulags or murdered.
Now that was a mean thing to say! Sorry Chegitz... I just had to... "
#1 was an attack on Floyd(Or at least that was my impression, he could have meant JT but I think #2 would have made more sense if that was the case), in #2, it seems like he is trying to make himself appear better by trying to disassociate the right wing of which he is a part from Floydian ideology, thus not letting himself get tarred. #3 was a reply to Boris going after him. #4 was a stupid joke in bad taste that added nothing to this thread.
Or at least that's my interpretation of Fez on this thread. I could well be wrong. But then I may well have missed the other stuff and Fez does have a history, so I can understand your decision.
As for the economic thing, the cost to consumers may not be that much, I was just pointing that out because in Floydian ideology any harm to the average person is completely evil. Actually though if you added up all the Deadweight losses from the Unemployment Insurance taxes you might end up with a more significant impact. Although in this case most economists would say the positive externality gotten from people not pushing for more new deal style programs every time there is an unemployment surge makes unemployment insurance worth it.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|