 |
|  |
 |
|
Japher
|
 |
Ook! Ook! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Jun 2002 time: 05:24
|
|
Resistence to bi-lingual education is both a cultrual and economic issue.
ESL is a dominant institution throughout the public schools already, form elementry school through college. The financial requirements for these schools (already over crowded and under funded as is) to offer two of every class, one in english and one in spanish, would be drastic. It would also sprout demands from other immigrated cultures to have the classes taught in their language.
A majority of state and governmental documents, with the intention of being presented to the public, are already presented in several language. At a cost, I am sure, is being passed on to the tax payers, and not the illegal immigrants, or legal immigrants soaking up welfare.
Also, the reason for American education is to prepare the student to become an effective part of society. Not their society, but American society. Since a large portion of buisness conducted within the US is conducted in English it would behoove the student to learn that language.
Heck, bi-lingual employees will always get the edge over an equally qualified applicant who speaks only one language.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Japher
|
 |
Ook! Ook! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Jun 2002 time: 05:24
|
|
Drake:
You have a point, but...
American Culture is a blend of other cultures. To some extent assimilation is required by all walks of life. The same could be said if say, a mid-westerner moved to somewhere like San Diago. It is a different place with a different society. One in which there is a strong Mexican presence.
When a two cultures merge, the result is something different, but in America, neither culture is completely destroyed.
For example:
I go to a Mexican restaurant in the US/Cali. The cooks and waiters, most of the behind the scenes people speak to each other in Spanish/Mexican. They speak to their customers in English and they serve Mexican food, as well as a select number of "American" dishes, ussually found on the kids menu.
I go to a Mexican restaurant in Mexico. Everyone speaks Spanish to everyone, and good luck finding a Hamburger on the menu.
There is a difference between adjusting and assimilating. One does not need to ditch their culture in order to survive in America, but yes they will have to adapt to the way things are.
If it is Mexican culture to sit on their hands and be good for nothings, then I can see how one could say that it is Mexican culture that is wrong with Mexican Illegal imigration. Yet, all the Mexicans I have know have been some of the smartest, hardest working people I have ever met. Thus, I would still have to say that it is not the Mexican culture that is a soar issue, but the economic impact that is the issue, and in some cases this impact can be drawn to cultural issues.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drake Tungsten
|
 |
Knee deep in alien womyn...
Oct 2001 time: 14:24
|
|
quote: American Culture is a blend of other cultures. To some extent assimilation is required by all walks of life. The same could be said if say, a mid-westerner moved to somewhere like San Diago. It is a different place with a different society. One in which there is a strong Mexican presence.
When a two cultures merge, the result is something different, but in America, neither culture is completely destroyed. |
Very true. I'm not concerned with immigration as long as the migrants eventually assimilate into American culture. And you are right in saying that the immigrants will introduce new elements to American culture as they assimilate. This is natural and has been going on since the earliest days of the Republic. I have no problem with this.
My concern is that the number of Mexican immigrants is becoming so large that it is becoming harder and harder to assimilate them into American society. With the huge numbers of immigrants and the high concentration of these immigrants in the Southwest, it is becoming possible for immigrants to come into the U.S. and avoid assimilation into our culture.
For example, there are some places in the US where it is possible to live your whole life without learning English. Areas like these are almost completely divorced from the predominant American culture, which concerns me. I don't want to see a shadow culture develop in the US; such a development could lead to all kinds of trouble.
The basic point is that many people dislike immigrants who refuse to assimilate into the predominant culture. To get back on-topic, I can see why many Europeans would not want the unrestricted immigration from Turkey that would come along with Turkish EU membership. The Turks have proved to be very resistant to assimilation in the past, and European societies aren't as effective at assimilating immigrants as America is. Cultural issues are definitely involved in the resistance to Turkish EU membership, as are political and economic concerns.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:24
|
|
I'm all for the integration of Turkey, but SirRalph pointed correctly it's too early. However, if we don't show more goodwill than we currently do, Turkey might radicalize itself, and all efforts would have been wasted.
The fear of massive immigration is highly irrational, even if it's very present : we have many agreements with countries like Poland, which gives the same moving possibilities to their citizens than a full membership in the EU, and yet it didn't affect migrations significantly. Same is probable with Turkey.
What can Turkey provide ? Strategically, they can be a true asset for the EU (the concept of common military progresses extremely slowly, but progresses nontheless), with their location and their ability to give great numbers for infantry.
Plus, if their economy progresses, they can be a great help to Eu's economy. Remember 20 years ago, how poor Spain, Portugal, Greece and Ireland were in comparison to the rest of the EU ? Except for Greece, they have all caught back, and now participate in EU economy as equals. Agreed, Turkey has to progress a bit outside the EU, because the investements needed to better their economy are much higher than what Ireland needed.
All the Turks I know of really want Turkey to be part of the EU, and get more disappointed every time it's postponed (granted, all Turks I know live in Germany). I don't doubt Turk's motivation to enter the EU any second.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
My unbiased two euro cents.
I see no major problem in Turkey joining the EU provided they adopt its values of human rights, real democracy and respect for the law both international and domestic.
A problem for the EU would be the funds for Turkey that are now provided for mainly by the US. Also if Turkey enters, the financial burden will be on the EU but since military issues remain on national level the US would still use her for whatever it wants.
Hence the EU gets all the financial burden, but fewer of the geopolitical value of Turkey.
And no, I don't think it has tried to change anything but a few facades. Human rights violations continue unfortunately, army still has a strong say as ever in politics and interntional laws vis a vis Greece are still not being respected. (i.e. air space violations)
If all those are fixed, then by all means welcome Turkey.
It would be nice for us and for Turkey to ease down on military spending at last.
Last edited by Bereta_Eder on 12-12-2002 at 04:22
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
quote: That shouldn't stop you from posting it. |
I dont have the subscription.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|