Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > How can you not believe in evolution?
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (7): [ 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Zero is offline Zero
King
Bouncing back and forth
Sep 2002
time: 00:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:41
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#91 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote:
Originally posted by FNBrown


So, you're saying that over a process of millions (billions?) of years, said bacterium, given the proper environmental stimulus, will eventually evolve into an intelligent bipedal life form?


I think ur underestimating the amount of time you have stated over there....

Giancarlo is offline Giancarlo
King
Los Angeles
Apr 2000
time: 02:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:41 Visit Giancarlo's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#92 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

Calc, I think I worded that incorrectly. Science provides me with a better idea of how the universe works whereas creationism does not. Also I don't think there is a god. That is why I am atheist. So you are right on the trusting of my ability to observe and reason.

Provost Harrison is offline Provost Harrison
Emperor
The farce is strong with this one.
Feb 2000
time: 05:24
Arrow  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:42
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#93 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

quote:
Originally posted by FNBrown


So, you're saying that over a process of millions (billions?) of years, said bacterium, given the proper environmental stimulus, will eventually evolve into an intelligent bipedal life form?


I am not even going to answer that question as it is so oversimplified...it depends on the environment and selection pressures involved, but there will be change in a varied environment. What the end point after such a lengthy time depends on the environment...well alright, I did answer the question...more concisely, there is no reason why it wouldn't.

Boris Godunov is offline Boris Godunov
King
Portland, OR
Aug 2001
time: 00:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:42
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#94 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

quote:
Originally posted by Calc II
The contradiction within the bible is quite irrelevant. Whether God exists or not, or whether God gave a message to some prophet to write the bible, it is ultimately written by a man. Man who is suceptible to lies deceit and exaggeration. To point out that this writer made a contradiction within his own writing does not prove/disprove the existance of God.


The existence of God isn't the issue, it's the scientific validity of evolution versus the validity of the Biblical account of Creationism. The Bible can't even keep its own ducks in order, much less stand as scientifically valid against evolution. Since Creationists rely on a literal interpretation of the Bible for support, saying it is the infallible word of God, even one demonstrated contradiction shows it is indeed fallible. A fallible source sans scientific support is no basis for a legitimate theory.

FNBrown is offline FNBrown
Prince
of the Sierra Nevada foothills
Dec 2001
time: 21:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:43 Visit FNBrown's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#95 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by ayronis



Genesis 1:25-27, Humans are created after the other animals.
Genesis 2:18-19, Out of the ground God forms each animal and brings it before Adam to name.

How could Adam name the animals as they were created if he was created after them?


The first chapter of Genesis gives a summary of the events on all six days of creation; the second chapter provides more details of certain events of the sixth day.

FNBrown is offline FNBrown
Prince
of the Sierra Nevada foothills
Dec 2001
time: 21:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:45 Visit FNBrown's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#96 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by Provost Harrison


I am not even going to answer that question as it is so oversimplified...it depends on the environment and selection pressures involved, but there will be change in a varied environment. What the end point after such a lengthy time depends on the environment...well alright, I did answer the question...more concisely, there is no reason why it wouldn't.


So why haven't years of scientific laboratory experiments produced anything but stronger bacteria? I'm not over-simplifying anything - I'm just asking a straightforward question.

Boris Godunov is offline Boris Godunov
King
Portland, OR
Aug 2001
time: 00:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:47
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#97 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

quote:
Originally posted by FNBrown


The first chapter of Genesis gives a summary of the events on all six days of creation; the second chapter provides more details of certain events of the sixth day.


That doesn't explain anything.

One account gives a precise order of the creation of animals and then man. The second account gives a precise and opposite account. The only way you can say one is not precise is by playing the kind of symantic games that make a literal interpretation of the Bible impossible anyway.

ayronis is offline ayronis
Prince
New Haven, CT
Nov 2002
time: 00:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:48
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#98 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

quote:
Originally posted by FNBrown


The first chapter of Genesis gives a summary of the events on all six days of creation; the second chapter provides more details of certain events of the sixth day.


That doesn't change the fact that Adam cannot both be created after the animals, and name the animals as they are created. It is a contradiction because only one of them could have happened.

Boris Godunov is offline Boris Godunov
King
Portland, OR
Aug 2001
time: 00:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:48
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#99 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:
Originally posted by FNBrown


So why haven't years of scientific laboratory experiments produced anything but stronger bacteria? I'm not over-simplifying anything - I'm just asking a straightforward question.


Do you have any idea of the temporal difference between even a hundred years and a BILLION years? It's an enormous difference.

Zero is offline Zero
King
Bouncing back and forth
Sep 2002
time: 00:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:49
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#100 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

quote:
Originally posted by Boris Godunov

The existence of God isn't the issue, it's the scientific validity of evolution versus the validity of the Biblical account of Creationism. The Bible can't even keep its own ducks in order, much less stand as scientifically valid against evolution. Since Creationists rely on a literal interpretation of the Bible for support, saying it is the infallible word of God, even one demonstrated contradiction shows it is indeed fallible. A fallible source sans scientific support is no basis for a legitimate theory.


Sigh, basically you are sayig that base 8 math is fallible since under decimal system, 5 + 5 = 10. And base 8 math will not give you a 10. You're making a scientific validity on a concept that isn't based on science? c'mon..


Wait...Why am I helping out creationism arguement anyway?

Provost Harrison is offline Provost Harrison
Emperor
The farce is strong with this one.
Feb 2000
time: 05:24
Arrow  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:50
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#101 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote:
Originally posted by FNBrown


So why haven't years of scientific laboratory experiments produced anything but stronger bacteria? I'm not over-simplifying anything - I'm just asking a straightforward question.


How does a short period of time in a small lab compare statistically with millions of years with all the oceans in the world. There was a lot more time and a lot more grand a scale. The numerical comparison between the two is imcomprehensible, but put it this way, the chances of putting bacteria on a plate and expecting something to crawl out the next day would be negligable...

Zero is offline Zero
King
Bouncing back and forth
Sep 2002
time: 00:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:51
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#102 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by Boris Godunov


Do you have any idea of the temporal difference between even a hundred years and a BILLION years? It's an enormous difference.


Like I said before... You or FNbrown and I probably cant grasp what billions of year is like.

monkspider is offline monkspider
King
banned
Aug 2001
time: 23:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:51
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#103 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by Calc II


And you think science at its current state is infallible?

Im a believer of science, I have to admit. It takes faith to also believe in science. Tfaith comes from our ability to trust our senses, logic and math to lead us to the truth. Who said those things arent fallible anyway?


You're absolutely right of course. Science is far from fallible. As are most things in this world. In fact, I have stated my unwillingness to fully accept current evolutionary theory in this very thread. I used to be a most outspoken proponent of evolutionary theory at my university, what with Kansas outlawing it's teaching and all. I have subsequently come to realize that it does have some very serious holes. I don't dismiss evolution as a whole, because it goes without saying there are some aspects of it which are literally cold, hard scientific fact. But I have simply come to realize that it can't be end-all theory of everything that many claim it to be. I think a healthy deal of skepticism toward both evolutionary dogma and religious dogma would be good for everyone.

Boris Godunov is offline Boris Godunov
King
Portland, OR
Aug 2001
time: 00:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:51
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#104 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

quote:
Originally posted by Calc II


Sigh, basically you are sayig that base 8 math is fallible since under decimal system, 5 + 5 = 10. And base 8 math will not give you a 10. You're making a scientific validity on a concept that isn't based on science? c'mon..


Wait...Why am I helping out creationism arguement anyway?


Not at all. Creationists are the one saying their theory should be taught as science, alongside of or in place of evolution. If so, it has to be subjected to the same scientific standards as evolutionary theory. The fact that it ISN'T science is exactly the point!

SpencerH is offline SpencerH
King
Co-Ruler of my patch of land south of Birmingham Alabama
Feb 2002
time: 23:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:54
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#105 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote:
Originally posted by monkspider

I don't dismiss evolution as a whole, because it goes without saying there are some aspects of it which are literally cold, hard scientific fact.


Like what?

Zero is offline Zero
King
Bouncing back and forth
Sep 2002
time: 00:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:54
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#106 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

quote:
Originally posted by Boris Godunov


Not at all. Creationists are the one saying their theory should be taught as science, alongside of or in place of evolution. If so, it has to be subjected to the same scientific standards as evolutionary theory. The fact that it ISN'T science is exactly the point!


You're taking the arguement everywhere. First about creationists demanding creationism in science class, thats wrong. Thats like telling a buddhists to include christianity sermon during their worship. It doesnt belong there.

Second, I thought the thread topic was about how can one not beleive in evolution.

monkspider is offline monkspider
King
banned
Aug 2001
time: 23:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:56
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#107 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

The account of Genesis creation recieves quite a deal of criticism from some people, and unfairly so. It is pretty clearly an allegorical account of the world's creation, and in that vein it is quite accurate. So long as you realize that it is, indeed an allegory. Ergo, the world wasn't created in seven literal days and so forth. It is the only account of the world's creations in any of the world's relgions, so for that it quite special. Just don't always take it literally.

CyberShy is offline CyberShy

Emperor
Delft, The Netherlands
Mar 1999
time: 06:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:58
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#108 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

quote:
If there were no 'broken' genes, and there is no mutation to cause evolution then how do you explain how the genes got 'broken'?


There is mutation.
I just don't believe mutation results in improvements on the long run. Not even with 'natural selection'.

monkspider is offline monkspider
King
banned
Aug 2001
time: 23:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#109 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote:
Originally posted by SpencerH


Like what?


Like natural selection, and mechanisms of micro-evolution and so forth. There actually is quite a bit of good science in today's model of evolution, it is just unfortunate that there is so bad science as well.

Zero is offline Zero
King
Bouncing back and forth
Sep 2002
time: 00:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#110 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by monkspider
The account of Genesis creation recieves quite a deal of criticism from some people, and unfairly so. It is pretty clearly an allegorical account of the world's creation, and in that vein it is quite accurate. So long as you realize that it is, indeed an allegory. Ergo, the world wasn't created in seven literal days and so forth. It is the only account of the world's creations in any of the world's relgions, so for that it quite special. Just don't always take it literally.


Like I said. Written by a man. A man not as sophisticated as a modern man more likely. Man, I'm not a christian and even I can see that.

ayronis is offline ayronis
Prince
New Haven, CT
Nov 2002
time: 00:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 01:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#111 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

from http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-god.html
"There are two parts to creationism. Evolution, specifically common descent, tells us how life came to where it is, but it does not say why. If the question is whether evolution disproves the basic underlying theme of Genesis, that God created the world and the life in it, the answer is no. Evolution cannot say exactly why common descent chose the paths that it did.
If the question is whether evolution contradicts a literal interpretation of the first chapter of Genesis as an exact historical account, then it does. This is the main, and for the most part only, point of conflict between those who believe in evolution and creationists. "

Aeson is offline Aeson
Emperor
orangesoda
Nov 2001
time: 22:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 02:02
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#112 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

quote:
It is the only account of the world's creations in any of the world's relgions, so for that it quite special.


Um.. the creation myth is standard fair in every culture.

SpencerH is offline SpencerH
King
Co-Ruler of my patch of land south of Birmingham Alabama
Feb 2002
time: 23:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 02:04
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#113 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by monkspider

Like natural selection, and mechanisms of micro-evolution and so forth. There actually is quite a bit of good science in today's model of evolution, it is just unfortunate that there is so bad science as well.


I'd agree that mechanisms that could drive evolution exist. I'm not so sure about any evidence of it actually occuring. There's lots of pseudo-scientific speculation though.

Boris Godunov is offline Boris Godunov
King
Portland, OR
Aug 2001
time: 00:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 02:05
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#114 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

quote:
Originally posted by Aeson
quote:
It is the only account of the world's creations in any of the world's relgions, so for that it quite special.


Um.. the creation myth is standard fair in every culture.


I was about to yell at him about this...

monkspider is offline monkspider
King
banned
Aug 2001
time: 23:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 02:05
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#115 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

quote:
Originally posted by Aeson
quote:
It is the only account of the world's creations in any of the world's relgions, so for that it quite special.


Um.. the creation myth is standard fair in every culture.


Well, it's the only one that is a serious account. It doesn't claim that the earth came out of the mouth of a goat or any such allegory. It is a mostly accurate account, with just a bit of allegory thrown in for good measure. Although my studies of hinduism, buddhism, taoism, etc aren't perfect, I don't recall them really offering any recollection of the Earth's creation.

monkspider is offline monkspider
King
banned
Aug 2001
time: 23:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 02:06
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#116 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote:
Originally posted by SpencerH


I'd agree that mechanisms that could drive evolution exist. I'm not so sure about any evidence of it actually occuring. .


Fair enough.

Aeson is offline Aeson
Emperor
orangesoda
Nov 2001
time: 22:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 02:06
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#117 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

If the Bible can't be taken literally, then why should the God in the bible be taken literally?

loinburger is offline loinburger
Emperor
Sweet Sauce Jones
Jul 1999
time: 00:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 02:06 Visit loinburger's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#118 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

FNBrown: Any Google search for biblical contradictions will provide you with a whole slew of them. Specifically, I ran a search for bible + contradictions -- here are some excerpts from the first site that came up...

quote:
Are we saved through works?

Ephesians 2:8,9 "For by grace are ye saved through faith . . . not of works."
Romans 3:20,28 "Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight."
Galatians 2:16 "Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ."

vs.

James 2:24 "Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only."
Matthew 19:16-21 "And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? And he [Jesus] said unto him . . . keep the commandments. . . . The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet? Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven."

The common defense here is that "we are saved by faith and works." But Paul said "not of works."


quote:
Does God change his mind?

Malachi 3:6 "For I am the Lord; I change not."
Numbers 23:19 "God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent."
Ezekiel 24:14 "I the Lord have spoken it: it shall come to pass, and I will do it; I will not go back, neither will I spare, neither will I repent."
James 1:17 " . . . the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning."

vs.

Exodus 32:14 "And the Lord repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people."
Genesis 6:6,7 "And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth . . . And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth . . . for it repenteth me that I have made him."
Jonah 3:10 ". . . and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not."

See also II Kings 20:1-7, Numbers 16:20-35, Numbers 16:44-50.

See Genesis 18:23-33, where Abraham gets God to change his mind about the minimum number of righteous people in Sodom required to avoid destruction, bargaining down from fifty to ten. (An omniscient God must have known that he was playing with Abraham's hopes for mercy--he destroyed the city anyway.)


quote:
Does God tempt people?

James 1:13 "Let no man say . . . I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man."

vs.

Genesis 22:1 "And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham."


Etcetera, etcetera. I'll agree that the Bible has merit, but I don't see how you could possibly contend that it is infallible...

CyberShy is offline CyberShy

Emperor
Delft, The Netherlands
Mar 1999
time: 06:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 02:06
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#119 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

quote:
Boris: all of these things couldn't be here by chance, so it that proves God!"


it's one of the arguments, but you're free to laugh about it. laugh some more!

quote:
First, you have no evidence that the earth isn't here by chance


pathatic.
if you think it's here by change, you're the one who should prove it. And yes, I know people are trying to prove that. It's morely that I want to point out how silly it is that I have to prove that it's not by change

quote:
your relying on such a subjective notion of "the earth is so pretty" is silly, as that's an opinion. Certainly there is also a lot ugliness, imperfection and such in the world, which goes against your theory.


does it?
and, I know that my opinion about beauty doesn't have any importance to you. It does to me though, and the question was why I did not believe in evolution, remember.

but that was just a minute before you, some superior evolution fanatic fundamentalist, get in this thread just to use your modern jihad to spread your evolution gospel.

Go ahead, cut some troats. Your opinion is the only true one! All the others are idiots! Go and get them master Boris!

quote:
The mutation statement just shows you don't really know how evolution works.


silly silly silly.
evolution works through mutation.
I know how it works, that's why I don't believe it.

Aeson is offline Aeson
Emperor
orangesoda
Nov 2001
time: 22:24
  Old Post 19-12-2002 02:08
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#120 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

quote:
Well, it's the only one that is a serious account. It doesn't claim that the earth came out of the mouth of a goat or any such allegory.


And God (Jehovah) is somehow more real and tangible than a supernatural goat in what manner?

 
Pages (7): [ 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24.
Apolyton Time is 00:24.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0728 seconds (89.84% PHP - 10.16% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net