 |
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:24
|
|
Spiffor, to answer your question what I'd do if burgler hits my home.. I will kick his nuts in. And he is getting a new nose from my Easton bat. But that's possible here, because burglers don't have guns.. and I'm fairly big, strong and able to do some fighting, if I was small and not able to wrestle.. I'd go with golf stick.
I think we are also lucky, because burglers don't just come in peoples homes when they're in there..I don't know why that is. Maybe they are afraid of confrontation with the people inside, or something else.. but it just doesn't happen here. My mom, who lives in the states too btw, forgot to lock her door one day and voila, some guy came in. She was pretty scared, because the guy was big and was in her living room.. and she doesn't have any self defense equipment either (and is refusing to get one, even the baseball bat I'm bringing her anyway this january btw).. She was lucky that the man left when she told him to leave. Last time she forgot to lock the door, even when it was in the middle of the day.
It's something to get used to for sure. I worry about it often, fortunately my father is going back there.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:24
|
|
Ah ok, thanks for the info, now I'm wiser .
So we have burglers, but no robbers.. thank God.
If I had a gun, warn them about it. If I didn't have a gun, I'd get the hell out, and call the cops and cry 'white woman in trouble' so they'd get my house fast.. or 'officer down'. If they were unarmed, I'd still go at it. Running pure adrenalin and fury can get you long way ahead . If I had no chance, and possibility of getting killed, I'd just get out and call for help. Why risk your life for it? It's not like they can take your house..
What would you do if 3 robbers with uzis came to your house? Go at it with the old smith & wesson? .
I know you're saying that having a gun will increase your chances very much. And I'm NOT saying I wouldn't get a gun if I was living in there. I think I wouldn't.. but I like shooting targets, so maybe I just would, but not because of robbers.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sinapus
One might also look back at history approx 80 years ago. Something about a national ban on a certain drug, and the gang violence that sprang up as a result. Seems oddly familiar for some reason.
(Also brings to mind the phrase "sometimes History doesn't repeat itself, sometimes she lets fly with a club and screams WHY DIDN'T YOU LISTEN LAST TIME?!) |
That arguement might be valid if:
1) Every other counry that's ever had prohibition experienced the same level of violence as the United States
2) The United States were the only country in the world that has made drugs illegal. Living in Canada, I can tell you that we have the exact same laws regarding drugs (with perhaps recent exceptions being bantied about in Ontario about marijuana) as you do. I'm sure many other countries do as well.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Wraith
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Aug 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
--"f you don't give them a reason to think you are a danger, you might get out of it alive."
Don't have a reference handy, but I've seen a study that shows that people who resist are less likely to be injured, with it broken down by types of resistance (guns being the highest level, and the least likely to be hurt). I don't remember the conditions this applied to, though. I'll have to see if I can find it again.
--"Why is violence our culture?"
An interesting book that addresses something I happen to think is a (if not the main) root cause:
Less than Words can Say by Richard Mitchell.
--"I'd like to see a poll with this question"
Depends. If he's armed, then probably, although it depens on the weapon and the location. Like I mentioned before, guns are intimidating. They don't have to be used to be effective.
--" because almost anyone without criminal record can own a m16"
This has been addressed in several ways, but I am rather curious why this sort of myth sticks around.
And as far as lethality goes, military weapons are covered by the Geneva convention, which places some limits that aren't on weapons meant to, for instance, down bears and bucks.
Military weapons are often more about rate-of-fire than long-range accuracy (there are exceptions to this, of course, but the guy with the sniper rifle isn't going to be in your face).
Wraith
"A sword never kills anybody; it is a tool in the killer's hand."
-- Seneca, Letters to Lucilius
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
I'd say the number three reason are:
1. The War on Drugs
2. Poverty
3. High population densities
Few countries persue the enforcement of these laws with the same fanaticism as the US. For instance, we have half a million non-violent drug offenders in our prisons. The US really is unusual in this regard, among developed states. |
Hmm...according to the stats I found:
http://www.cjcj.org/pubs/one_millio...illionexec.html
in 1996, there were 114,000 and change people in US jails for drug offenses. I find it hard to believe that number's nearly quintupled in six years. During that same year, there were about 1.8 million total people in US prisons, so that would make the drug offense percentage about 6.3%. In Canada, approximately 9% of our prisoners are there for drug-related charges
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1385/a08.html?152
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
Sure.
from the first link:
quote: According to data collected by the United States Justice Department, from 1978 to 1996...the number of drug offenders increased seven-fold (from 14,241 to 114,071 inmates). |
and:
quote: The Justice Department recently released data showing that the number of prisoners in America rose to 1.8 million last year, the highest level ever, and the second largest prison population in the world. |
My mistake, I think the total prison population figure is from 1998, so the percentage would probably be a little higher in the US.
from the second:
quote: And the guards needed to watch over the nine per cent of Canadian prisoners behind bars for drug crimes. |
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
Ramo, I wonder if this is what you were thinking of:
quote: About 25 percent were on probation for a drug law violation and 18 percent for driving while intoxicated. |
from: http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/08/25/jail.stats/
of course, there are about 4.6 million people under probation (from the same source).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
Allow me to quote the entire passage:
quote: Contrary to the public perception that the incarceration of violent offenders has driven America's prison growth, the Institute found that 77% of the growth in intake to America's state and federal prisons between 1978 and 1996 was accounted for by nonviolent offenders. According to data collected by the United States Justice Department, from 1978 to 1996, the number of violent offenders entering our nation's prisons doubled (from 43,733 to 98,672 inmates); the number of nonviolent offenders tripled (from 83,721 to 261,796 inmates) and the number of drug offenders increased seven-fold (from 14,241 to 114,071 inmates). Justice Department surveys show that 52.7% of state prison inmates, 73.7% of jail inmates, and 87.6% of federal inmates were imprisoned for offenses which involved neither harm, nor the threat of harm, to a victim. Based on this data, we estimate that by the end of 1998, there were 440,088 nonviolent jail inmates, 639,280 nonviolent state prison inmates, and 106,090 nonviolent federal prisoners locked up in America, for a total 1,185,458 nonviolent prisoners. |
The key word there is entering. Otherwise, it doesn't make any sense. Since, by definition, there are only violent and non-violent prisoners among prisoners. Your interpretation implies that there are only 360,000 prisoners in the US.
Note that entering is implied in the sentences following violent prisoners. Otherwise it contradicts itself by saying there are 1.1 million and 260 thousand prisoners at the same time.
quote: And the guards needed to watch over the nine per cent of Canadian prisoners behind bars for drug crimes |
While in the US, it's closer to 50%...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
Ramo:
Whoops - my bad. I skimmed that article way too fast, apparently.
I'm still not so sure you can say that the number one cause of violence in US society is the war on drugs, though.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|