 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:24
|
|
13. Religion should be actively protected by the government
What does that mean?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:24
|
|
Uber:
See it should have said FREEDOM of religion should be protected...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Edan
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by UberKruX
you should be allowed to practice your religion without fear of persecution, hate crimes, or government penalities. |
Then shouldn't that be freedom of religion, instead of just religion? it's just as easy to interpret that the government is a theocracy protecting a single religion without a barrier between church and state.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:24
|
|
Makes sense...
#1 Christian democrat
#2 Fascist
#3 Anarcho-Capitalist
#1 You are a Christian democrat - or, in the UK, a "One Nation conservative"; in other words, although you share the usual conservative belief in stability and duty, you believe that such duties include a responsibility on the part of the better-off to help those who are less fortunate. You will be socially conservative, but in favour of a mixed economy where the state does have a role in providing public services. Christian democracy arose after World War II, succeeding more doctrinaire Catholic parties dating from the 1870s.
#2 You are a fascist. You combine a strong belief in the nation with authoritarian social values, and a willingness to impose your views upon others. You strongly oppose immigration, and are willing to take radical action to combat it.
#3 You are an anarcho-capitalist. Anarcho-capitalists take the Jeffersonian belief that "that government is best which governs least", and extend it - "that government is best which governs not at all". The theory of anarcho-capitalism is that the market can replace the state as a regulator of individual behaviour (resulting in private courts, private policing etc.).
thanks
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Buck Birdseed
|
 |
Khoon Ki Pyasi Dayan (1988)
Nov 2000
time: 05:24
|
|
I'm actually in the process of researching it right now. I was going to have it done by next week, but I think early february is a more realistic goal.
In the meantime, if anyone can suggest a sensible way of calculating the position of a point in an equilateral triangle such that, given three numbers, each a person's relative tendency towards one of the corners compared to the other two, an accurate position for that person's inclinations within the triangle is given. If a person gives only answers tending towards one corner, he should end up in that corner, if answers relating to two corners, on the line between them, and so on. Bear in mind that each value is relative, not absolute- A person who scores {1, 0, 0} should end up in the same place as one who scores {62, 0, 0}. This relativity is because there will be many alternatives for each question, some worth more points than others, and because there will be an "important-not important" scale.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:24
|
|
Sava:
The right-wing forces I agree with are supported by industry, religius groups, the military, and the lower middle class... beat that punk ass communist... the proletariat will rise and slaughter the decadent leftist bourgeious.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24.
Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
29-12-2002 22:01
Bad test.
OK... I guess that makes me a green anarcho-communist. 
).
|