 |
|  |
 |
|
Chris 62
|
 |
But I'm feeling MUCH better now
Jan 2001 time: 00:25
|
|
The NY Post carried that as today's headline, with a picture of Chirac and Schroeder "confiring". 
It now seems that France is using an anti-war stance to gain popularity in some sections of the EU, in an effort to escape from repaying billions of Euros, and that Schroeder is using events to cover a failing economy, by using that old standby, when things get rough, blame the Americans.
The point is, since it's becoming clear that neither nation cares at all about disarming Saddam Hussein, why is anybody listening to them?
A number of EU states, such as Great Britain, Italy, Spain, and new nato states like Poland, Romania, the Chezh republic, ali of the Baltic States, ect, are now fully willing to put a stop to Saddam and enforce resolutions already in place.
Rumsfeld heavily critised the two nations, as "old Europe", the French were extremly angry at this, one minister refused to coment as she could not control the content of her reproof of the US minister.
I have heard some coments of "good for her" from some Europeans, as well as undisguised laughter from Americans at the French.
The question now is, can these powers remain allied in a world where their interests are clearly at odds, and are drifting further apart?
Is the Paris-Berlin axis now taking over the EU, with the UN soon to follow?
Your thoughts, if you please.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:25
|
|
First, I want to thank Chris62 for not making this anti-europe thingie, as it easily would be done if not avoiding certain words 
I don't know, I think Schroeder does this to get votes most of all, so I don't know where Germany REALLY stands with this issue. I don't know anything about Frances position on this, except that if they have some issues, it's easy to team up with Schroeder now.. Maybe they are against the war even without any internal issues, but I doubt it. I think they're being dishonest.
I believe it's important to keep relations to Germany and France warm, and try to keep communication in friendly tone. Of course this is only just a little fighting words, nothing more and will not result to anything serious. When the dialogue stops, then it's serious and we should all be worried.
I kind of understand the problems, because you all are allied to each other in military alliance... hmm.. makes you think.
Europe is really changing now, former power twins, France and Germany are retreating and thinking what to do, and even we, the people of peace are thinking of joining NATO and sending troops to fight them wars. I say let's jump over the dead horse and get on with it!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ozz
|
|
Canada
Mar 2002 time: 05:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Chris 62
The point is, since it's becoming clear that neither nation cares at all about disarming Saddam Hussein, why is anybody listening to them?
|
France's UN veto. They only care about $$$.
BTW. It doesn't matter whether Saddam's armed, or were this is just to get the oil which are the common
arguments. He's a dictator who pulled the trigger that
started two wars of aggression. That alone is reason to kick him out of power.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Main_Brain
|
|
Economic World Center
Jul 2002 time: 06:25
|
|
blame the Americans.
-Nope.
neither nation cares at all about disarming Saddam Hussein
-Both (+Russia) say that the UN Inspectors should be given more Time. More importantly the Support to War in the Arabic States is low.
Rumsfeld heavily [...]undisguised laughter from Americans at the French
-Uh great Diplomacy Mr Rumsfeld
Regarding the "confering" you realize it was 40 Years French-German Friendship?
Bah! Not worth discussing
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"It now seems that France is using an anti-war stance to gain popularity in some sections of the EU, in an effort to escape from repaying billions of Euros"
Fascinating.
"can the United States, France and Germany continue as allies"
Continue?
"Resolution 1441 didn't demand a smoking gun."
Right, it says "at Mr Bush's pleasure". So much more refined than "smoking gun".
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Chris 62
Saddam had 12 years to comply MB, how much longer does he need?
They have been "friends" for 40 years, now they sing the same tune, but again, that doesn't answer my question, should these powers remain allied? |
It depends on the point of view i guess.
They should if you think the world needs something to balance the US influence/power etc... in the western democracies arena.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"Cute. Pure willful ignorance on your part though."
You have a funny way of interpreting international law, but you're not in a US tort lawsuit here.
"They're trying to over take the EU into their submission.."
Which is why no other than Blair is bouncing like a happy canguroo about the presidency idea.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Paris and Berlin were ALWAYS the axis that kept the EU going.
Now it is just a bit more apparent since they went against the war on Iraq.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|