 |
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:25
|
|
To be edited by the leaders of the Scholia.
Status:
- Researching Writing at zero (so in effect researching nothing)
- 63 gold cash, +12 per turn.
Urgent questions:
- Do we want to agree to exchange all techs learned by both us and Vox for an indefinite period of time? By my agreement with Jon, if we accept the Alphabet-for-Iron trade (assuming it's offered), we agree to either accept that arrangement or provide some other kind of compensation to Vox (to be determined) for the fact that they could get Alphabet cheaper from Lux.
Military:
- Grog attacks the barbarian camp unless he has been injured by an earlier barbarian attack, in which case he fortifies.
- New settler moves 1 (second move on path 1-1-1-4 to Bolderberg site).
- Slash moves 2 toward Bolderberg site (unless Grog gets killed, in which case he heads north to take Grog's place).
Economy:
- Finish the tech trade (assuming it's offered) if and only if we're willing to accept the conditions attached. See urgent question.
- Worker #1 finished with road; moves 1-2 along road to prepare to connect Bolderberg and its horses.
- Worker #2 finished with chop, starts irrigating.
- No changes to cities.
Diplomacy:
- Tentative agreement reached with Vox regarding the tech situation if GS approves it. See the "urgent question."
Last edited by nbarclay on 27-01-2003 at 11:35
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:25
|
|
If Vox started a barracks right after The Voice disappeared from the F11 chart, they could rush us with four immortals by the time we could even just research both Writing and Iron Working, much less get iron hooked up (unless we get super-lucky and have iron on Bolderberg's hill). I don't think it's likely, but considering that such a rush could put us out of the game if Vox gets good RNG results, I don't think it's a risk worth taking.
In regard to trying to change the deal, remember that Iron Working is the more expensive tech. Right now we have Vox's commitment to an even swap since they got a more expensive tech in the first stage, but we lose that commitment if we try to demand gold in addition to the tech.
Once things reach a point where it is clear enough that Vox is breaking their commitment that we would feel fully comfortable bringing our case before other teams, we might take the position, "Okay, you've broken your deal with us. We're going ahead and researching Iron Working, and if you want to redeem your word so that we do not spread warnings to other nations regarding your lack of honor, you have to complete the promised trade and pay us back for the gold we lose due to your initial refusal to keep your word." But I think we'd need to allow at least a couple more turns before we'll have a good enough case to bring before the court of international public opinion.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Theseus
Like I said, unstable. How about IW now for Writing and contact later? |
I was thinking along the same lines. Here's a response I've written for Jon Miller and am about to click "send" on:
quote: I've presented your message to the team, but here's my own, personal reaction. Our original arrangement was designed so that the first stage of the trade would give you a higher-value tech and the second would give us a higher-value tech so that the two exchanges would balance. Now you are asking for two consecutive exchanges where you end up with the higher value. Does that seem fair to you? It certainly doesn't to me - especially not when you sound like you want to then trade Writing to another civ to further enrich yourselves.
I'm willing to propose the following counter-offer to Gathering Storm:
(1) We go ahead with the Iron Working for Alphabet now. (That helps both of us compared with if you would make an exchange with our rival to your north (which I suspect is Lux)).
(2) When we get Writing, we trade it to you for whatever contacts with other civs you have at the time.
(3) We retain an exclusive right to trade Writing to other civs. Considering that compared with our original agreement, you will be getting Writing for nothing more than contact information, that does not seem like an unreasonable stipulation.
(4) You agree not to try to renegotiate the deal further, even if an opportunity comes up where you might be able to get a deal you like better on Writing elsewhere.
I don't know how my own team will react to this, and it's certainly not an official proposal yet, but I'll go ahead and bring it up with you at the same time I do with Gathering Storm so you folks can go ahead and start thinking about whether you would agree to it if we make it (or something similar) an official offer.
Nathan |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shiber
|
 |
Haifa, Israel
Jul 2002 time: 07:25
|
|
Beautiful!
They will not go back on such a promise. It would be too much.
I suggest that we take the deal (while it's up!), and tell them that the exact details will be worked out later. Give them our most honest word that we will work out a fair deal. Begin researching writing. 
Regarding the fair deal I mentioned above, an arrangement where we send them writing, and they in turn send back contacts with Civ X and promise not to sell writing to Civ X (which makes up for the difference in beaker cost between Writing and IW, and the original The Wheel and BW, which sums up to 72 beakers if I'm not mistaken). Seems very fair to me, in fact.
If they don't agree to the patent on writing, then we could suggest that they pay us an additional 45 gold (that should keep them from upgrading any warriors soon) as "royalties". Remind them that we did not ask to put a patent on The Wheel, and that they can broker this tech as well if they wish, as long as they pay us in gold as compensation.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:25
|
|
My response (and this time I'll leave it here for at least a while before sending it):
quote: I very much like the idea of a three-way partnership, but would be extremely nervous about engaging in such a partnership on terms where every trade has to go through you. I can understand that you would really like to be in a situation where you can leverage your monopoly on contact with "Civ X" (as we sometimes refer to your mysterious neighbor) to ensure that you do not get left out of the loop, but I hope you can understand our extreme reluctance to accept a situation where our links with the outside world remain so horribly fragile for the foreseeable future. Frankly, a partnership where both the flow of communications and the flow of technology has to go through you would not feel like a true partnership at all (at least to me).
What I've envisioned as the best possible scenario beyond Writing (and I've actually had this basic concept in mind for some time now) would be if we research Code of Laws, you research Philosophy, and a third civilization researches Literature. That would set up research for Republic at the earliest possible date, with the ability to build libraries gained along the way to further speed research (and, in the process, enhance our nations' culture).
Prior to that, at the Writing stage, it might be possible to line things up so that Civ X will research something else (Mathematics, maybe?) while we research Writing, and then we would trade Writing to Civ X for what they researched and trade what they researched to you for something you research in the meantime. In such an arrangement, I fully recognize that the tech you research would have to be a less valuable one if you are to start work on Philosophy in a timely manner.
One other thing about such an arrangement is that techs researched and shared in such a manner would have to be viewed either (1) as joint property, with the proceeds of any sale outside our group (whether gold or additional technology) shared equally or (2) as belonging exclusively (for trading purposes) to the civ that researched the tech. Without such a provision, one of us could betray the others by selling techs researched by all three of us and keeping the proceeds to themselves.
Anyhow, that's my current thinking on this matter (and still at highly preliminary stages, since I imagine all three civs will need to give the matter a great deal of thought before making such a long-term formal commitment).
Nathan |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
I know I sound like a broken record, but I do not see the point of negotiating "unoficially" with members of Vox, posting the results here, and then "going ahead" to "officially" make the proposals. I honestly do not care how Vox handles their diplomacy, but I'm uncomfortable having all dealings between our teams start and end with Nathan and Jon Miller exclusively.
Any "unofficial" communication is probably taken seriously by Vox (we must assume so). So even though we're claiming that we're "just talking", this talk can have diplomatic repercussions. Maybe we will not be interested in a three-way partnership at all once we contact team X, so "unoficially" disussing it is not in our best interests at this time. Maybe the team actually wants to get rid of Vox at the first opportunity (who knows? we haven't had any polls lately).
The whole point of having a school of diplomacy is to discuss these matters, come to an agreement and present a unified and coherent front. So I suggest the diplomats need to do a bit more work during the next few turns pinning down exactly what we do and do not want from Vox. This will create a policy with which Nathan, Sir Ralph or nye can use to play the turns.
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:25
|
|
How does this sound as an official message? Does it reflect the stance we want to take?
quote: Greetings People of Vox Controli,
Gathering Storm has agreed to make my earlier offer regarding Alphabet, Iron Working, Writing, and contacts official. The concept of a three-way partnership is definitely an interesting one, but our diplomats and economists really need more time to consider the issue before we can make any kind of commitment, even an informal one. In the meantime, we need to get Iron Working now so we can move on with our research into Writing without undercutting our ability to maintian parity in defensive technologies. Your failure to keep your commitment in a timely manner has already cost us valuable time, and while we can understand your desire to renegotiate in light of changing circumstances, any further delay can only hurt relations between our peoples.
Sincerely,
The People of Gathering Storm
Nathan Barclay, Chief Economist
|
Edit: Changed a line that Theseus was concerned might express weakness.
Last edited by nbarclay on 27-01-2003 at 03:31
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|