 |
|  |
 |
|
Velociryx
|
 |
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
So...you're saying then that if you owned the machine and the time was NOT ripe for revolution, you'd keep it and "exploit" those you hire to use it? Is that consistent? Why not just turn it over to them now....perhaps that would be the spart that ignites the revolution?
And nope...I believe you to be a good person, but I do not believe you would just hand over an expensive machine to others.
If you work hard, save your money, and buy something like that....why should you? The machine represents the fruits of YOUR hard work. Nobody else's.
If other people want to use your machine, that's cool, but they're using YOUR machine. Since the value of the machine is greater than the value of what's made from the machine, you pay them for their time spent making stuff, they pocket the money, and you eventually make the money back on the machine.
That's not evil or exploitive, that's common sense! And it also happens to be the essence of capitalism.
-=Vel=-
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: More likely I would inherit it. I'm not saving my money for those things |
You really are hung up on people who inherit things from their rich mummies and daddies, aren't you?
Believe it or not, there are people who actually work hard, make lots of money, and do stuff with that money (like own their own business, making cool little widgets that people want to buy). Not all rich people were born so. That's what social mobility is about - so the Bill Gates of the world can have a good idea, put it into pratice, and become megawealthy (and then throw a couple hundred million bucks at AIDS prevention). And if Billy gets out of line, there is this neat anti-trust legislation that allows the government to smack him down a peg or two.
quote: exploitation is legal. It's called capitalism. Labor laws can improve things for workers, but exploitaiton is the nature of capitalism. With no exploitation you have no profits. |
Without profits, there is little incentive for anybody to do anything. Like it or not, very few people will work hard at something that doesn't benifit them.
That is the fundamental problem communism runs into. To overcome it, prior "communist" regimes have used force. Perhaps you have a better idea?
-Arrian
Last edited by Arrian on 11-02-2003 at 01:23
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Velociryx
|
 |
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
Duncan - the examples used, pulled from real life, form a pattern.
Patterns define the truth, and the truth is, what you are saying is not how things really are.
My assumption is that, because you believe in a different ideology (communism), and these examples run counter to the propaganda that communism spins, they are unacceptable to you.
Unacceptable or not, however, they are the truth.
Is capitalism perfect? No. But then, capitalism does not promise to BE perfect (unlike communism, which promises a utopia it cannot deliver). Capitalism opens the door to abuses in power, yes. But because of its decentralized nature, those abuses can never even BEGIN to approach the level of abuse to be found in a communist society.
Borrowing money is not evil.
Private ownership is not evil.
Rewarding people for their inventiveness, charging rent, and trading the use of an expensive piece of machinery for an agreed upon sum of money are not evil, either.
-=Vel=-
(first time I have ever been called a right winger, btw) 
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|