 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
mindseye
|
 |
A Yankee living in Shanghai
Apr 1999 time: 13:25
|
|
Interesting article, from what I've seen living here for two years, I don't doubt it. The author mentioned the limits of Beijing's control - this country seems far less monolithic than many assume. Regional and local Party officials, as well as other organizations, often have considerable power and independence.
quote: have left China's impoverished countryside for jobs in the cities, where they are treated as second-class citizens | This is indeed a terrible problem. People from rural areas are viewed with thinly veiled contempt. In this part of the country, the very terms "countryside person", "farmer", and "villager" are all considered derogatory. At least peasant construction workers here in affluent Shanghai often live in relatively nice housing erected on site for them. Whether they fare any better than their southern colleagues in receiving their rightful pay is not known to me, although I have never seen or heard of any labor problems (or attempted suicides) here in Shanghai.
quote: Sounds like anti-commie propaganda to me | Sounds perfectly believable to me, I'm very sorry to say.
quote: Protesters carried a portrait of revolutionary leader Mao Zedong | The irony is too rich!
quote: then I call it fascist. | I think it may have been The New Republic that carried an opinion piece a few months ago arguing this same point.
quote: On the contrary, comrade, we have more political freedom here than in the US. | This must have been a joke, right?
quote: At least, we can say bin Laden or al-Qaeda | Maybe you can say "bin Laden", but just try to visit the New York Times' web site. Both my home ISP and the one used at work have for a couple of weeks been blocking more western news sources than ever before, something I have not read about in the western press (maybe cuz I can’t see it! ). I'm down to Ananova.com and Yahoo news. Even the San Jose Mercury News is blocked, that's never happened before. Are sites blocked to HK access?
quote: I wonder if China's going to do a full return to capitalism or if they're just letting the capitalists build the infrastructure, and then going back to state socialism. | When capitalists were allowed into the Communist Party, it was asked if the Party would control the capitalists or would the capitalists end up controlling the Party. I don’t think it's a matter of if, looks more like "when" to me. Power has a way of following money around here.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
SnowFire
|
 |
New York City, NY
Jan 1970 time: 00:25
|
|
Are you suggesting that they let the terorists go free? Surely you must know of all the bombings and other terrorist attacks in the Xinjiang province.
Ah yes, that's the name, I'm always hesitant when talking about China because it's easy to mess up similar but different names (Like the good old Shansi province right next to the Shanxi, or something similarly close...). And of course I'm not in favor of terrorism. It's just that from what I know, the government over there has something a little stronger than TIPS and the Office of Homeland Security in place to enforce the law- they've just been afraid of international scorn if they used it. Now that the States is clamping down (something I'm not a huge fan of, mind), the PRC doesn't look so bad doing their version of clamping down. The point is, you guys were already farther down that path.
Btw, you do know that TIPS was just an idea that was defeated, right? Politicians were afraid of, among other things, the will of the voters. Maybe being able to vote isn't such a bad idea after all.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|