 |
ELECTION: Term 3 Minister of Defence
This poll is closed. |
| Turambar |
   |
2 |
13.33% |
| Pedrunn |
   |
8 |
53.33% |
| Zaphod |
   |
5 |
33.33% |
| abstain/don't care |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Total: |
15 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
Gilgamensch
|
|
France
Jun 2002 time: 06:25
|
|
ELECTION: Term 3 Minister of Defence
Dear Apolemurians,
this election is to vote for a new Minister of Defence, who will serve one month in office.
We have three persons competing for this office:
Turambar
Pedrunn
Zaphod
Therefore the poll will have four options, with the meaning:
Turambar = You want to elect Turambar as our Minister of Defence
Pedrunn = You want to elect Pedrunn as our Minister of Defence
Zaphod = You want to elect Zaphod as our Minister of Defence
Abstain = You don't care.
This poll will expire in 5 days on the 20th February 2003, 14:00 GMT.
In the name of our constitution and the name of our people, Senior Justice Gilgamensch
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maquiladora
|
|
I already voted for Turambar, God help us if we have a peace monger as MoD, and i cant see any reason to elect a new person yet. Would have been more interesting if one of them to run as opposition in the boring single candidate elections.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mapfi
|
|
Zurich, Switzerland
Jul 2002 time: 06:25
|
|
Good speech Pedrunn! You certainly do make a valid point! I would be interested on the further plan with Austria. How long should we battle them? Can we afford to weaken defences in order to take more of their cities? Should we enslave some cities to weaken their defenses whenever we reached the city limit or absolutely reached our defence limits?
Same questions go to the other canditates as well.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pedrunn
|
 |
of Natal, Brazil
Jul 2001 time: 02:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by mapfi
Same questions go to the other canditates as well. |
Great a debate. Lets begin with it! ( Please read my speech first otherwise you wont understand some notes)
First i would like to say that the words i write here are my plan to destroy the Austrians. And this plan should be deeply discussed to reach achive the best plan ever. It may have mistakes but again my political campaign is based on possible changes in this plan through discussions.
quote:
How long should we battle them? |
I dont want to measure the time of the war in terms of turns. But in in conquest. As i see we shouldnt send our troops to Wien neither beyond. So once we conquere Graz, Wels and Lins should be the max time we could spend in this war. But the War could end earlier due to the course of events, lenght of he war and the public oppinion (of course).
quote:
Can we afford to weaken defences in order to take more of their cities? |
I want to propose that: All cities must have an archer and a hoplite. Pedrunnia must have two hoplites and a archer. All attacks will begun after that achievement.
In Colonia Locuta we must have the 'East Army' fortified. An army that will be there serve as a source of garrison units, to defend cities at east and counter attack in case of the worst case scenario.
we must set up in H Town an attack with the a new army called 'West Army'. And send to Graz only after we have enough units (needs to be dicussed) and if not done until the next chats of this term.
We will not only will conquer the city but make the city be used as fort for the 'West Army' against a possible Austrian attack and defend the cities at west.
quote:
Should we enslave some cities to weaken their defenses whenever we reached the city limit or absolutely reached our defence limits? |
If we have a slave (this has to be discussed with the MoDA)
I propose: We shall only use slaves in cities of civs we are at war. And not in possible targets like Wels and Lins. So if the war of the Austrians dures that much (we still need to research jurisprudence and probably Drama) i think Wiens are the best target.
Note: The uses of wors like 'I propose', 'If', 'Probably', 'Public oppinion', 'Need to be discussed' are part of my proposal as MoD.
Every one of these decision are just draft in which may be totally thrown away or improved since i want to discuss about as much as i can.
Last edited by Pedrunn on 16-02-2003 at 17:04
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mapfi
|
|
Zurich, Switzerland
Jul 2002 time: 06:25
|
|
Well,well - an archer and a hoplite is a pretty weak defence, only barbs will be fended off with that - but that's totally my opinion. We should take as many cities from the Austrians away as we can. We need to cripple them or otherwise they'll fight back with force and don't forget production and PW bonus is on their side. That's why I also think we should at least consider to enslave some cities after we have acquired the number of cities we can seriously defend. We wouldn't need a slaver for that, neither the advance Slave Labour - Martin's city capture code would allow us to do it right now.
I'm eagerly awaiting the other contestents' opinions.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pedrunn
|
 |
of Natal, Brazil
Jul 2001 time: 02:25
|
|
Addition to enslave.
Enslavement should not be done in the next targets. Including Graz and Linz. Those cities have good placement. Wels should not be enslave but disbanded (if agreed by the MoDA) or kept (It does have good site compared to others of the same region). Disbanded because i still think we should continue our settling expansion. Specially in sites at south (2 cities at least- potato and hill site) and north (1 city at least- date/plains site) of Pedrunnia. But of course this must be talked together with the MoDA and the plan by the people. Others Austrian cities are good candidates.
Last edited by Pedrunn on 16-02-2003 at 17:28
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Turambar
|
|
England
Apr 2002 time: 05:25
|
|
They're eagerly awaiting my speech which I shall make tommorrow.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
J Bytheway
|
 |
England
Jul 2001 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by child of Thor
Just a thought do we have easy to access info on which candidates have served in which positions? I just want to be fair and give everyone a go at something(and i tend to forget who's done what). |
They are listed in the government announcements thread (by Locutus, a few posts down).
Last edited by J Bytheway on 18-02-2003 at 13:21
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zaphod Beeblebrox
|
|
aachen, germany
Aug 1999 time: 05:26
|
|
greetings fellow people of lemuria,
at first i have to apologize, i haven't held this speech earlier, i was kept away by some constitutional discussion, as you might have noticed as well as - and that was a much stronger reason - due to a little malady i had. the doctors diagnosted it as a "contempory lack of ctp2" in my system. but that has been cured. my best and thankful wishes to the wise staff of the pedrunnic memorial hospital.
i also wish to thank turambar, for his services to our country. though i have disagreed with him sometime, i respect him as a honorable person, and hope he will be back with time and health soon. and of course, i want to thank my competitioner pedrunn, for the great services as our president.
which brings me to the first point of my speech:
pedrunn says, that all decisions have to be discussed and decided upon in a free and democratic manner. well, there's not much to say about, except he's damn' right. i intend to do the same, since, you -the people- have to decide, and the ministers have to enact your will. as it was done, when the majority of you cried for war. you know, i was strongly opposing this, but now, that has been decided. what has this war brought us so far? two new and great cities, that will benefit our nation in growing, in size, in population, in military might, and sometimes later as well in scientific research. so far, we all agree. but what else did this war bring to us? an open flank and a dire enemy! yes, now our territory is greater, but so are our borders. at the time i'm writing this, our great army has to protect the borders all the way from pedrunnia, our beautifull capitol to the new and prospering town of pressburg. already fears have risen in our nation, that the austrains might sneak to pedrunnia through the unguarded wilderness to the northwest. so what can be done, to prevent this? well, there are several ways, one can thing of. one, which seems to be the most popular in the decreasing ranks of the warmongerers, would be to take all troops, amass them and capture graz, which is in a strategic position, roughly halfway between the austrian capitol wien and our own, situated at a river, which allows for quick unit transfers from or to wien, linz and pilsen. of course, it would be great if we could conqueor that important place. but can we do now? only if we weaken the defenses of our cities, and even then, its doubtful. and we have to remember, its not just taking graz, its also about defending it against the reinforcements from wien, pilsen and linz. so this can't be a shorttime solution. another idea of course would be, to seek for peace with austria, and i wouldn't be surprised, if thats what some of you expect from me and my "peacenicks", as the app has been called. i assure you, though i want peace, i don't want it now! we have teached the austrians already, that peace with us means only time for building up our own troops before we go for another raid against their towns. so even if the accepted (which i rather doubt, btw) they wouldn't trust us, which also means we couldn't trust them. and we still were suffering from our open flank in the west. peace shall not be made, until we at least get hold of graz, and even better wien as well. so, how can we capture graz, if we aren't attacking? i don't say, we shouldn't attack. i say instead attack later, and with a force, strong enough to capture graz, hold it, and even march on to another town of theirs! meanwhile we have to build up further units for defence. the 3 warriors we have, should be used as scouts in the border area, to get early views of austrian counterstrikes. this will enable us to replace forces in response to a possible attack on the river.
i guess that answers the question by honorable mapfi, about how we should battle the austrians: until we have got at least the keytown of graz, even better their capitol.
another question raised was, if we should attack further towns for enslavement when we have reached the maximum number of cities, our bureaucrats can handle. well, that is a difficult question right now. in general i would say yes. yes if
- if we still have an army capable of doing so after winning the important battles. we shouldn't further neglect the construction of infrastructure in our lands and our cities for gaining some extra workers and a bad reputation
- if the austrians don't agree to peace after we will have taken their cities at our borders
- if we aren't standing near to a major breakthrough in the scientific art of government, which will allow us to wield more cities soon.
- if we don't have anything more important for our army to do then.
but this is still some way to go, and other ifs might appear on that way.
i thank you for your audience. may our nation prosper in wealth, welfare, and peace as well, when it can be made safely. the holy apolyton be with you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maquiladora
|
|
*switches the mic on* okay can you do that one more time?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zaphod Beeblebrox
|
|
aachen, germany
Aug 1999 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Maquiladora
*switches the mic on* okay can you do that one more time? |
my speech?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gilgamensch
|
|
France
Jun 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
Election is finished.
Congratulation Pedrunn.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|