 |
|
Ozz
|
|
Canada
Mar 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
Highly unlikely that english will become everyone's first language. |
Actually due to Telecommunications , English may have a
chance to become the first world language, especially with it being the language of media and science (latin is truly a dead language since 1970) There will always be other languages people will use however to separate themselves into tribes. (Gaelic still exists)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
BeBro
|
 |
of the Krauts
Mar 2000 time: 06:26
|
|
quote: BeBro :
The big difference between cultural imperialism and acculturation is the overwhelmingness of the culture. I'm living in Stuttgart this year, where Gehwegs are called 'trottoirs", where wallets are called "portemonnaie" etc. These are the remains of a cultural imperialism, where the nobility dismissed Swabian culture as inferior and flocked to the "superior" French culture. |
From what I know of Swabia, this was the best the nobility could do...
Seriously, I donīt think this is all so easy, here comes the nobility, hey, letīs become more French, and thatīs it - it doesnīt work that way. And so it is not as easy to implement a master plan for cultural domination (which you seem to imply for the US).
People will use elements of foreign cultures over the long run only if they think they benefit from them.
quote: Also, Cultural imperialism is linked to the political attempt to impose one's culture to other communities. Maybe you don't know the agreement with Marshal's Plan included to lift ratios against American movies ? Do you remember how hard the struggle was during the latest GATT negociations between French and American government about the "cultural exception" ?
|
But one could easily say that this was primarily driven economically, not culturally. The entire "impose US culture" on others is a claim you still have to prove. What is the goal of this, if it is true? Can you really say McDonalds cares about culture, or do they only care about selling their stuff everwhere to get money everywhere?
Ok, you can argue that both is the case, and that US companies use cultural domination as means to reach higher profits (a la "if they think US stuff is cool theyīll buy more burgers). I wouldnīt disagree completely here, maybe some try such ways, however, as posted above, it isnīt as simple. For example, if the US cultural invasion is so overwhelming, why is there no deeper impact on peopleīs political beliefs in Europe despite lots of US movies that always show the US military guys on the right way (given the fact that in the current Iraq question most Euros seem to oppose the US position)? And if the cultural domination fails to reach such a goal - why should it be much more successful in other fields (when most of these fields have to do with the way people think about certain issues)?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ozz
Actually due to Telecommunications , English may have a
chance to become the first world language, especially with it being the language of media and science (latin is truly a dead language since 1970) There will always be other languages people will use however to separate themselves into tribes. (Gaelic still exists) |
Telecommunciations have a minimal effect compared to society.
Also how are american films being translated (with voices) into French going to "kill "anyone's language assuming (which isn't correct either) that watching a film in english is going to kill it in the first place?
As said highly unlikely.
Hopefully they'll become second language for some people. To others french will etc.
Generally it's good to know a second language.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DuncanK
Do you have an argument to support this or is this just a guess? |
Linguistic studies have already concluded which languages are in danger of extinction and which are not.
They also do not speak about english becoming the first language of anyone not native english except some... exceptions.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ozz
|
|
Canada
Mar 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
Telecommunciations have a minimal effect compared to society. |
Really, hasn't your english improved by access to this
Telecommuncations medium? I would hazard a guess
that more people as a percentage are using english
as a linga univeralus than ever used French, Latin or
Greek in paper letters in the past
Nothing to do with Hollywood or Bollywood. Science and
business drive English.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ozz
|
|
Canada
Mar 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
Linguistic studies have already concluded which languages are in danger of extinction and which are not. |
No language dies while somebody cares, Gaelic for
example. Its not that english becomes a "first" language
but a common tongue between peoples. Just like it
allows us to have this thread. I would assume english
is not your first language.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DuncanK
I see what you are saying. I think it's harder to express yourself with English even if you are proficient in using it. Are there more words in Greek to express yourself, or are you just able to express yourself in Greek better because it is your primary language? |
Both I think. In Greek I can think (more often than not) the exact word to describe one though or one emotion that I want to express whereas in english most of the time I have to use an approximate word or more than one words.
That can be beacuse I don't know the word in english, it doesn't exist or the specific meaning/specific feeling associated with it doesn't exist in the english speaking world. (as some might not exist in the two Greek speaking countries and Greek minorities in other countries). That's where the intricate relation between language and societal history/common experiences/specific societal codes enter into play.
That is the same with everyone talking in a foreign language which is his second I think. There are necessairily limits in expression.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ozz
|
|
Canada
Mar 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
Both I think. In Greek I can think (more often than not) the exact word to describe one though or one emotion that I want to express whereas in english most of the time I have to use an approximate word or more than one words. |
You can use "foreign" words in english, that is it's
main strenght, alot of english isn't english at all ,but latin, french, and NA Indian.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
About 80% of verbs in English derive from Greek through Latin. That presents some "easyness" to me (although some are altered almost beyond recognision) especially in what regards medical, philosophical and in general scentific terminologies.
IMHO English as a language is quite precise but lacks somewhat in nuances.
Of course there's no language which is superior to others (yes not even Greek ) since each language serves the societal needs of each linguistic group. So they're all equal according to most linguisists.
Last edited by Bereta_Eder on 05-03-2003 at 23:57
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|