 |
|
raghar
|
|
I wish somewhere else.
Oct 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
I like games withou any manual, well you could have some hints how can you start it, it is more fun this way.
Game info errors? Wasn't some bad info in Moo3 readme? I agree that is REALY BAD THING.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
mactbone
|
 |
Lift Your Skinny Fists Like Antennas to Heaven
Sep 2001 time: 23:26
|
|
Anyone who defiles this thread with disparaging remarks about Adventure Games should be banned.
Monkey Island series
Full Throttle (they're working on 2)
Sam & Max
Grim Fandango
'nuff said.
When was the last time you saw a movie half as entertaining as those games? Adult Swim Comedy is the closest thing to this with Home Movies, Aqua Teen Hunger Force, and Sealab 2021.
As to sports games - I hate Sega's NFL2K*. I like Maddden and I love NCAA Football. I like Inside Drive although there are obviously flaws and I may enjoy it more because my brother and I pick franchises and go at it.
As to Console vs. PC and someone arguing futilely that consoles had no good FPSes - Metal Gear Solid (1&2), Goldeneye, Perfect Dark, Halo. PCs have the edge in mass multiplayer but I'd rather play against 3-7 guys I know in one room than 21 I don't who prefer to call everyone "n00b" and espouse their "l33t"ness. Not to mention the absolute horrid quality of music on PCs compared to Consoles (Harry Greggson-Williams, Nobou Uematsu, those other RPG guys).
Edit: Added FPS
Last edited by mactbone on 06-03-2003 at 08:24
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
Best new PC game I've played in the last three years was Panzer General II.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
pg
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui

I LOVED Morrowind! I consider it the greatest game of all time. |
let me have my own ! i sort of consider morrowind as the antithesis for what is wrong with pc gaming. i admit many things were good about it, but it's kind of the poster child for what is wrong with games. morrowind is bloated(anyone try the russian auto adjusting viewing distance exe?), slow running(even ppl with good pcs got low fps), boring(you spent as much time walking as anything else!), and has little good gameplay(combat in mw sucked hard). morrowind is so complex that there are numerous "exploits" in the gameplay which mean skillful play makes the game no fun. once you figure out how to abuse the system a game is ruined. there are so many abuses in morrowind it's hard to argue they are actual abuses, instead of intented design(or if they weren't intended the design was messed up).
morrowind is a classic example of sequalitis also. mw is just an updated version of daggerfall with fancy new gfx, and a few different features. in many ways mw is worse than daggerfall. daggerfall was much more challenging in combat, lots of cool vampires/witch's coves/werewolves stuff, it had random questing, a bigger world, huge dungeons, guilds had meaningful perks, and a cooler storyline with personality(the underking anyone?).
mw could have been a much greater game if it had upped the ante over daggerfall instead of attemping to fix daggerfall's problems. mw did fix daggerfall's crashing problem but i must also point out the latest daggerfall patches are as stable as mw on my system. mw was easier to mod but again it was only a half hearted attempt as basically it's impossible to make mods which do something significant.
i was hoping someone would comment on my earlier comment since i thought it had a few insightful remarks. oh well... 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
pg
|
|
imran: did you play daggerfall?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tinyp3nis
|
 |
compensate this!!
May 2002 time: 07:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by pg
let me have my own ! i sort of consider morrowind as the antithesis for what is wrong with pc gaming. i admit many things were good about it, but it's kind of the poster child for what is wrong with games. morrowind is bloated(anyone try the russian auto adjusting viewing distance exe?), slow running(even ppl with good pcs got low fps), boring(you spent as much time walking as anything else!), and has little good gameplay(combat in mw sucked hard). morrowind is so complex that there are numerous "exploits" in the gameplay which mean skillful play makes the game no fun. once you figure out how to abuse the system a game is ruined. there are so many abuses in morrowind it's hard to argue they are actual abuses, instead of intented design(or if they weren't intended the design was messed up).
morrowind is a classic example of sequalitis also. mw is just an updated version of daggerfall with fancy new gfx, and a few different features. in many ways mw is worse than daggerfall. daggerfall was much more challenging in combat, lots of cool vampires/witch's coves/werewolves stuff, it had random questing, a bigger world, huge dungeons, guilds had meaningful perks, and a cooler storyline with personality(the underking anyone?).
mw could have been a much greater game if it had upped the ante over daggerfall instead of attemping to fix daggerfall's problems. mw did fix daggerfall's crashing problem but i must also point out the latest daggerfall patches are as stable as mw on my system. mw was easier to mod but again it was only a half hearted attempt as basically it's impossible to make mods which do something significant.
i was hoping someone would comment on my earlier comment since i thought it had a few insightful remarks. oh well... |
That pretty much sums it up for me. Well I don't know anything about daggerfell but the rest of the post. What's that viewing distance exe?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
I don't know exactly what about NHL2k3 I didn't like. It just wasn't as fun. Number one, its not on the PC. And unless you feel like paying extra, you can't play online with people. You can't import graphics, you can't create custom rosters(editing players and such). And it's too easy to score, even on the harder difficulty.
I'd give it like an 8.2, and NHL maybe a 9.1. NHL has few problems.
But I have a feeling you are just arguing because you don't like me so |
You've obviously never played NHL 2K3.
1. You can create custom rosters (editing players and such).
2. It's MUCH easier to score in EA's games. One-timers are extremely unbalanced in EA's. The scores in NHL 2003 are far higher in the same time as NHL 2K3. That's not just my observation, but everyone I know that has played it, including the reviews.
In NHL 2003, 5-minute period games, the scores would be somewhere like 6-5 almost every game. In NHL 2K3, in the same 5-minute periods, it's usually somewhere like 3-2...
There are also WAY more options to change to modify the game if you don't like something. Compare the options menus for gameplay of NHL 2003 and NHL 2K3...2K3's spans on five different screens, EA has one.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|