 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:26
|
|
|
11-03-2003 07:33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
|  |
|
How long will it take to repair the damge to America done by the Bush regime
|
Suffering from ads?
|
|
The economy's in the tank. Okay, that's not really his fault, up to a point. However, two of his policies were terrible for the economy. Number 1, regardless of your stance on the war, the uncertainty around the war is causing economic damage. On top of this, the war is going to cost a lot of money the government doesn't have. Estimates run from sixty billion to two hundred billion dollars. On top of this, with revenues already down and expenditures already expectated to go way up, he wants to push a tax cut that would further decrease government revenue, that would put the government into a long term deficit situation (as opposed to short-term which is okay) at a time when the dollar is already shaky.
Two, Bush has almost completely destroyed America's relationship with the rest of the world. From Kyoto to the World Court to the ABM treaty to the War against Iraq, Bush has thumbed his nose at the international community. It's his way or the high way, there are no negotiations. No one likes being dicatated to, especially not one's allies.
Three, civil rights: okay, we aren't a police state . . . yet. However, we have entered a period of true McCarthyism (unlike the PC crap righties were whining about only a few short years ago). People have had their businesses destroyed for the crime of being Muslim, people have been jailed for months incomunicado, American citizens are being held illegally in military brigs against the rulings of the court, many of the rules put in place to protect us from our government in the '70s have been undone or eroded (and the government has wasted no time in abusing its new powers), and plans are in the works for even greater attacks on civil rights.
Bush has done something the Democrats weren't able to convince me of in over a decade, that Republican or Democrat does make a difference. When will our long national nightmare end?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:26
|
|
The Bush administration is considerably hurting America's power at longer term, but the damage it does isn't really its fault.
America has now passed the apex of its power, and is entering the lowering curve, as the world is slowly becoming multipolar : the intra-European crisis will likely need to an ambitious Common Foreign and Security Policy, which will make the EU a significant diplomatic actor in less than 20 years, as it is a significant economic actor today. China still is growing and being modernized, which should make it the most influent country in a couple of decades. Russia seems to seethe its wounds, and is likely to get power with its remaining huge military ability.
It doesn't mean the US will become a small actor, but it will merely become one of the big dogs, rather than the absolute boss it is now.
Bush alienates the international community, and thus fastens this process. The arrogance of his administration helps the US of being hated, and helps other blocs to solidify on a easily criticizable common enemy. However, despite all his mistakes and clumsiness, he isn't the source of America ceasing to be the hyperpower.
On domestic policies, I don't think it will last forever. The paranoia born from Sept. 11 will abate at some point, and the McCarthysm you're currently knowing will be scorned upon by history as the former one.
Overall, I think Bush will be harshly criticized by history books for its terrible misuse of his power, but he isn't the source of America's uncurable problems.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:26
|
|
We've alienated everyone who isnt our sissy *****
|
|
|  |
 |
|
johncmcleod
|
 |
Coeur d'Alene, ID, USA
Jan 2002 time: 21:26
|
|
The war might help the economy. Of course, you can't predict what will happen in the war but the most likely situation is us completely overwhelming Iraq, especially if we have help from the UN. The swift victories for us will boost investor confidence, just like the Battle of Coral Sea and Midway did. That's my prediction. I agree with Kman, I don't think there will be a great schism besides right after the war. We'll get a new president and the world will think, "The last pres made a bad decision, they have a new one now." and they won't be mad, hopefully. The economy started to go sour at the end of Clinton's last term, so it wasn't Bush's fault. The technology bubble was bound to burst sooner or later.
What I'm worried about is what the Arab world will think after the war. I'm scared of another 9/11.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ozz
|
|
Canada
Mar 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
quote: Real friends try and stop you from doing something dangerous, stupid, and illegal. |
Real friends maintain their loyalty while trying to push you onto another path. That is what Tony Blair and the UK have tried to do.
Real friends don't openly lead the opposition to your efforts, even if they think you're making a mistake. France is no friend to the United States, no matter how you spin it... |
Real Friends don't sh*t on their allies, and threaten them economically the first instance they disagree.
Friendship works both ways.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
quote: Others side with the US opportunistically, by the same way some countries oppose the US out of opportunism. Don't be fooled. |
BS. How are the interests of the UK, Australia, Spain, Japan and South Korea served by a war in Iraq? They aren't, which shows that these countries are real allies of the United States. |
UK : according to the Brits here, Blair tries to give an international standing to the UK by modifying the US policy. Blair is mostly credited with sending Bush to the UN. Also, the UK needs a strong alliance with the US for its technology transfers, and military efficiency (intelligence exchanges and such). But I admit the UK is probably the only country which follows the US out of friendship.
Spain : Care to wonder why the Axis of Vassals took a whole week to write its letter supporting Bush ? Spain and Italy (and Britain) are playing a power struggle against France and Germany within the EU. The construction of the Common Foreign and Security Policy is at stake. Aznar took the opportunity to oppose the homogenous power within Europe (French-Germany) by siding with the homogenous power outside Europe. Also, Aznar tries to give the long lost Spanish international status : the Persille affair went in that direction, the participation in writing tomorrow's resolution too.
You can be sure Spain will oppose the US if it messes with Morocco. Spanish position is purely opportunitic.
South Korea : They need a powerful ally against the dangerous NK (which has the potential to level most of Seoul extremely quickly, according to Seeker). China would be a good ally, but China's motivations in helping SK would be much worse than US' motivations, and they are looking for as many allies as possible anyways. Should the US have a policy towards NK too absurd in the eyes SK'ers, SK will flee the US' domination as soon as a satisfying alternative appears.
Japan : It has nearly nothing to lose in that war, and wan win some international recognition if it gets to send peacekeeping troops. Also, Japan wouldn't want to create divisions over such a minor matter for Japan's interests, while the coalition must remain united in the upcoming clash against NK.
Australia : Also, nothing to lose. By showing to the US and the world they have some power projection abilities, Australia can hope becoming recognized as a regional power, and hopes finding wore goodwill from the US next time Australia's and Indonesia's interests will clash. However, I admit the cultural bonds can help Australia to have a generally better goodwill towards the US than others.
In general, I think countries who vocally support the US either need them for protection (Japan, South Korea) or try to snatch some power by being buddy-buddy with the hyperpower. They all have their interests. And I remain sure your "friends" will disappoint you as soon as their interests will be diverging.
After all, some Americans call France an "enemy" because our interests don't coincide with yours on the Iraq issue. Interesting view of what an ally is, don't you think ?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|