 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kramerman
just becasue you are cynical, doesnt mean Bush has no vision. Could there ever be a president that would please you? |
McCain, Liebermann, Edwards, Bob Kerrey, Nickles, hell, even Bush sr. - I could come up with quite a few, from both parties.
Bush having a vision isn't a problem - he had lots of them in the 60's, no doubt. It's the content of the vision, and it's correlation to the harsh realities of this universe, where things get to be sticky. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Richard Bruns
|
|
NC, USA
Nov 1999 time: 06:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
The economy's in the tank. Okay, that's not really his fault, up to a point. However, two of his policies were terrible for the economy. |
Tax cuts usually cause short term pain in exchange for long term gain. By lowering the cost of investment and doing business, they expand the economy and allow the government to collect more taxes long term. The tax revenues enjoyed in the 90īs were at least partially the result of Reaganīs tax cuts. Of course, the person who is in office 10 years form now will get credit for any possible good results of this tax cut.
War fears will of course cause short term economic loss. But look to the long term. If this war is really about imperialism and oil, as the lefties and anti-americans claim, them we will come out of it sitting on and controlling huge reserves. That has to be good for the economy. (I donīt believe that the war is about oil, but if you do you must concede that oil would make us rich if we really were to be imperialists.)
quote: Two, Bush has almost completely destroyed America's relationship with the rest of the world. |
No arguments there. While I believe that, legalistically, we are entirely correct and justified in most of our actions, the handling of it has been atrocious. The Kyoto Protocol is a pile of garbage, but we could have pulled out of it a but more diplomatically. Same with the current mess, current resolutions and treaties give us the legal right to attack but the diplomacy has been horrible.
But I think that the long-term damage will be surprisingly small, since most of the anti-Americanism is actually anti-Bush sentiment, which will go away when he does.
quote: Three, civil rights: |
I heard all of the same things when Clinton passed his anti-terrorism bill, except of course back them the right-wingers were the ones complaining about the abuses of government power. We didnīt turn into a police state then, and I donīt think we will now. But maybe Iīm just the proverbial frog in the pot. Only time will tell.
I supported McCain, by the way.
edit: typos
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BunnyGrrl
|
 |
of disputes
May 2002 time: 00:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DuncanK
And I doubt if China will ever reach the economic strength that people are assuming they will. They have serious problems. I'm suprised they have made it this far. |
I think China's government is too paranoid to let China really become the humongous world power people are predicting. It's hard to maintain a rigid dictatorship and be a major world player. I think the Soviet Union got "lucky" because of timing.
*edit for typos
Last edited by BunnyGrrl on 11-03-2003 at 14:36
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:26
|
|
FROSTY UBER ALLES!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"Now that we're out of 9/11 shock, I think we will see more and more opposition to draconian security laws."
I'm extremely pessimistic (even by my standards) on this. There will be further attacks; I think the Bush admin's policies virtually guarantee something even bigger than 9/11. And then the big question is whether the constitution will go to the shredder (its contents, to be more precise).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:26
|
|
the sad thing is so many people on the right support restrictions of freedom to protect freedom (this was in the words of someone on another forum)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mindseye
|
 |
A Yankee living in Shanghai
Apr 1999 time: 13:26
|
|
Great post, Che, dead-on.
The damage to allied relations and antagonizement of the Arab world will be long in healing, as will the swaggering, go-it-alone American charicature-come-true, as others noted.
(Remembering Che furiously ringing the alarm bell about Ashcroft during his nomination..)
Last edited by mindseye on 11-03-2003 at 20:20
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Adam Smith
|
 |
Maryland, USA
Jan 1970 time: 00:26
|
|
Except for specific problem areas (health, social security) the economy will do just fine if not meddled with. This is the one piece of advice that Robert Solow got into Clinton's head at the start of his first term. Clinton largely followed this advice, and for that he deserves credit. (Yup, you heard it here first. )
I think we will be able to patch things up with Europe in four or five years, once we get rid of our "bull in a china shop" diplomacy, and Europe realizes that their somewhat inflexible economy won't be able to drive the whole world by itself. In short, we really do need each other.
Its going to take a generation to undo the damage we are about to do to our relations with the Arab world. Maybe less if the Israeli-Pal problem gets solved, but thats down the road. The real problem is whether ME demographics, poverty, religion blow the whole thing to hell long before it gets fixed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Andrew1999
|
|
"The first step is admitting you have a problem."
There are a lot of people out ther who support Reaganomics and "my way or the highway" diplomacy. Repairs won't happen very quickly if no one thinks they need to happen.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Actually, Che, the Iraq crisis has showed us who are our true friends and who are not. This has helped the world to clarify itself. Clearly, France and Germany want to lead Europe in a path separate from the US. This has nothing to do with Bush. |
A path separate from the US, or a path separate from where the US is currently heading?
quote: The events in Iraq will, IMO, help transfrom the Arab states from a group of backward societies into the modern democracies. I can't stay the way it is forever. Reform had to start somewhere. Iraq is that place. |
Two points here - arab resentment of western-imposed "reform" will be extremely high among the many "have nots" that won't be the beneficiaries of that reform, and arab "gratitude" will be non-existent among many of the groups empowered and legitimized by reforms. Do you honestly think that organized fundamentalist political parties will be grateful to us for setting up a system that allows them to act politically?
Second, our "allies" in the region are the oppressive thugs who have held down lefties, fundies, and just about everyone inconvenient to their and our interest. In "reforming" the arab world, we'll be undercutting or eliminating the power of our lackeys. That type of reform didn't work real well (although it was internally imposed) in Iran in the 1970's.
quote: As to the Patriot Act, it was passed by a Democrat Senate. What are we to think? That this is an Imperial EDICT? |
The Patriot Act was passed by both houses of Congress, but was de facto written by the administration, gives powers to the executive branch, and was packaged and heavily promoted, from the name on, to be essentially unopposable in the immediate post-9/11 atmosphere of "you're either with us, or you're with the terrorists." The basic premise of the Patriot Act's marketing was a lie that would make Goebbels proud - we did not need expanded police powers to stop 9/11, and we didn't suffer 9/11 from a lack of those powers.
The identified intelligence failures were huge, and fell into three main categories which are untouched by Patrion: Lack of communication between agencies, (FBI & CIA, plus failures by Rice and the NSC), bureaucratic hindrance of field personnel by headquarters (FBI field offices being denied authority to investigate), and failure to follow established proceedures (INS processing of visas)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
My Wife Hates CIV
|
|
Michigan
Jan 1970 time: 05:26
|
|
'Two points here - arab resentment of western-imposed "reform" will be extremely high among the many "have nots" that won't be the beneficiaries of that reform'
there's not a whole lot of love out there today...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
My Wife Hates CIV
|
|
Michigan
Jan 1970 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DuncanK
MtG is absolutely right. There is no hope for anything good to come from this war. We should be lucky if its not a complete disaster. |
so things are good the way they are now?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|