 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
The question I was answering UR was rising US support. And many Arabs support the overthrow of Saddam.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
No, I was talking about powerful nations as well. It seems like you would only give a voice to powerful people and nations.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Sure, so are we. What we are opposing to isn't the end but the means. |
I don't support the means either. But there is nothing I can do about it. After the war is over though I suspect that many will be relieved that Saddam is gone.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by vee4473
and as long as france threatened veto no matter what was presented, every member of the UN could have voted for the resolution, but when france vetoed....the UN is officially against it...
so , with one veto, the image is presented that the world is against the coalition.
wow... |
The US specifically said that France could veto it but if it got 9 votes, it could say "The majority of the UNSC is for us! France DARES to defy them!? Infidels!!!" and run off with war.
But you see, they couldnt get the votes so they BACKED OFF. Wisely, too.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
The only thing is, the region is very likely to be in a worse state without Hussein. |
That is one reason why I really do not support violent intervention in that region. I think that we are opening up a can of worms. But on the other hand, it may work out as planned. I am just waiting to see what happens next.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|