 |
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
If your not from the U.S. then plug in your countries name instead......anyway this issue is important for every democratic western nation.
The stupidity of the average American on social issues is mind boggling-the stupidity of the average high school student actually scares me.......
People who have no idea of the issues should NOT be voting as they just muck up the results with uninformed opinions.
This idea has been thrown around for two centuries but I always supported it.
It wouldnt be HARD exam by any means-it would take somewhere between 10-30 minutes and be filled out in advance of the voting at some standard site. The testee would be isolated for a few minutes and fill the exam. VERY basic kind of questions-what is the constitution, who was the first president, what is the state capital etc....A VERY easy exam but some basic knowledge everyone should know. No harder then the basic test given to people applying for citizenship.
When the ignorant vote they arent voicing "their" opinion, they are voicing the opinion of whatever politicion effected them with a commerical.....
Do you really want some uninformed dolt who has NO idea of the issues, and was influenced by some flashy political add to neutralize the value of your informed vote?
Problems for the disabled who cant make it to a voting center to be isolated to fill out a form are another issue but im sure we can work out a solution.
I think 20 minutes of every American(at least every voting American) would go a GREAT way towards fixing this countries problems.
Edit: Correction-I think this would be the single most important/easiest change our country could possible make.
Last edited by Vesayen on 29-03-2003 at 00:52
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
most people don't vote anyway
so I don't see it as an issue
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
it is true that our highschool education (and grade school) should be better
people who finish highschool should be able to pass the immegrant citizenship test
Jon Millre
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
John-im a graduating senior at a suburban highschool with overall great grades, a blue ribbon school, but in political science/social stuides the students knowledge is abominable.
Yes they can pass the tests but they have NO retained knowledge on it a month later-I would expect 90% of my school to fail such an exam.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
John-most of my school would fail it........(graduating senior) they have NO retained knowledge about social issues/sciences.
Any idea where I could find one online though? Curious what I would get.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Traianvs
|
 |
Belgium, land of plenty (corruption)
Jan 2000 time: 06:27
|
|
quote: VERY basic kind of questions-what is the constitution, who was the first president, what is the state capital etc.... |
Well not knowing what your state capital is, would be most ridiculous, you'd have to be living in the stone age for that..
Well I would be in favour of the exam if the questions were about the party you are going to vote on
a test on the programme of the party you are voting on, it shouldn't be too difficult, but you should know what the party stands for (in the US you only have about 2 big parties, the greens are pretty pathetic so..., but in Belgium there are lots of parties, and the thing is with a lot of voters here, quite a few vote on the rightwing extremist party but they don't know what the party's programme is.. they just vote on them because they are racists and they want foreigners out here )
That would do much good... If you fail the test your vote doesn't count..
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
"Well not knowing what your state capital is, would be most ridiculous, you'd have to be living in the stone age for that.."
DO NOT under-estimate the stupidity of Americans on politics/social issues as you will repetadly be amazed when you see new lows (I can say this because im American heh).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Carver
|
 |
reprocessing plutonium, Yongbyon, NK
Jan 2002 time: 23:27
|
|
No exams.
If you're truly intrested in the issue I reccommed The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? by Arthur Lupia and Matt McCubbins. In synopsis:
quote:
The political consequences of limited information can be very serious. However, our theorems suggest that people do not suffer these consequences nearly as often as many scholars and pundits proclaim. Politics often forces poeple to learn what they need to know from the oral and written testimony of other people. In these cases, limited information procludes a principal (voter) from making a reasoned choice if the conditions for persuasion do not apply. Therefore, if a principal has access to the testimony of at least one speaker whom she perceives as knowledgable and trustworthy, then limited information need not preclude reasoned choice. However, and unlike prior explanations of persuasion, we conclude that trust need not be derived from a principal's assesment of a speaker's personal charachter. Instead, we argue that external forces that alter and clarify a speaker's incentives can serve as the basis for trust. When people can learn from others, reasoned choice requires neither encyclopedic information nor relevant personal experience.
People have incentives to be, and in fact are, quite selective about whom they choose to believe. |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Skyjack666
|
|
"Should there be a civics exam to vote?"
How whould the Dems ever win?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
A test sounds like a good idea in theory, but in practice I see at least two huge problems (I'm sure there are many other issues too):
1) Voter turnout is already painfully low, and not just in the US. I don't think you need to give people another reason to not vote.
2) Having said test doesn't really adress the issue of voter ignorance. Presumably, everyone would know that they have to take the test, so they could just "cram" for it right before, which does nothing towards making an informed political decision.
There's also the possibility of comprehension problems based on language/education level, but I guess if you made the test easy enough, these could be largely avoided. Then again, if you make the test that easy, you're not really getting a better standard of voter, now are you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Absolutely not. People have a RIGHT to vote; it's not dependant on IQ or social status or keeping up on current events. It is a basic right.
Christ, you people scare me.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
quote: Originally posted by SlowwHand
No one is suggesting a poll tax, Guynemer.
|
Doesn't matter, Sloww.
Citizens have the right to vote, period.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|