 |
|
solo
|
|
Lowell, MA USA
Jan 2001 time: 05:27
|
|
Yes, Marco Polo's is quite a bargain!
If we're willing to invest twice as much later in the game to get less than half as much by building Darwin's, MPE seems like an obvious choice now in EL games.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Elephant
|
|
Phila PA
Aug 2002 time: 00:27
|
|
The beginning of the game is the most crucial phase: every decision has major impact on the later stages. When Railroad rolls around (little pun there) we are usually sitting pretty (if not: RESTART) and have caravans or gold to spare. Darwins is a useful way to try to bridge the Railroad-Corporation gap, but I would say it is not a definite-build. There are far more benefits to MPE than just four or five techs: early maps for deciding/improving on trade routes, instant embassies for intel and KeyCiv gifting (ELCG1 was so weird, running into the Mongols before 3000BC!), and "tech slave" manipulations of AI research. I usually get it built around 1000BC, but I am often "reaping the benefit" well into AD years, for such techs as Chivalry and Railroad. To me it is the first must-build.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zenon
|
|
Solo, SG (2),
thank´s for the comments on my large map game. Solo, it seems indeed, that your early tech experiments gave us a nice advance. I have seen that you lost the Greeks to the Barbarians, too, so there was only one direction to go for trade. The trade routes you build up in the end are quite impressive and must have given huge returns.
Building the Lighthouse could have given a better result if I had not - quite unintended - delayed city growth. In fact, it seems I was behind your game, SG (2), until automobile. As usual you beat be on the way to Monarchy (on both maps). BTW, in between my projection for the landing date was 1455 (launched 1440) versus your 1456. May be you should add just a few gallons of fuel?
Cliff,
a very impressive game on the medium map. I am convinced this approach would have won the large map.
Zenon
|
|
|  |
 |
|
solo
|
|
Lowell, MA USA
Jan 2001 time: 05:27
|
|
Zenon,
If I only could have got those long range trade routes in place a little sooner...
I had more gold than I knew what to do with at the end.
I was also quite impressed by what Cliff managed to do, since many have tried this before (with huts too), and have not managed to do as well on a medium map.
SG(2) has already shown how well many cities work in large map games. If a few try this in ELG #4, I will go the minimal approach so we can see how the two methods compare.
In #4 I'm giving early Monarchy a try, to compare how it works vs. Republic first.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
La Fayette
|
|
albi, france
Oct 2000 time: 06:27
|
|
Goodbye, Monk
You have shown us so much energy and dedication in dealing with problems that I am convinced you are going to win that fight against poor health very soon.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
rjmatsleepers
|
|
quote: Originally posted by La Fayette
Goodbye, Monk
You have shown us so much energy and dedication in dealing with problems that I am convinced you are going to win that fight against poor health very soon. |
Not goodbye but au revoir.
All of us wish you the best and hope you'll be back here soon.
RJM at Sleepers
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zenon
|
|
Monk,
so sorry to hear about this. My best wishes for a soon recovery - and stay around if you can.
Zenon
|
|
|  |
 |
|
solo
|
|
Lowell, MA USA
Jan 2001 time: 05:27
|
|
My worst fears have been confirmed by this sad news. It's been a privilege to have associated with a player with so much skill and class. In the meantime let's hope that things change for the better sometime soon and that you'll be able to return. Best of luck, Monk.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
solo
|
|
Lowell, MA USA
Jan 2001 time: 05:27
|
|
Monk,
You have argued correctly, too, about a celebrating Monarchy! I am starting to believe that for most EL game situations, Monarchy may be better as first government choice than Republic.
The very successful games by you, SG(2), Zenon and others using Monarchy have taught me to re-evaluate my EL stategy as put forth in the guide. What really convinced me was that earlier Trade was possible when using early Monarchy. Another key was how well Monarchy can work when used with Marco Polo's. All you have to do is get 2 or 3 more techs by trade to equal or beat the faster research pace of Republic. One thing I still am debating is whether using Pottery and HG pay off in the long run, since I'm doing pretty well without either so far in my #4 large map game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
solo
|
|
Lowell, MA USA
Jan 2001 time: 05:27
|
|
SG(2),
This was a great synopsis of the two games!
Could I interest you in providing more of them in future games?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Elephant
|
|
Phila PA
Aug 2002 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by solo
Monk,
You have argued correctly, too, about a celebrating Monarchy! I am starting to believe that for most EL game situations, Monarchy may be better as first government choice than Republic.
The very successful games by you, SG(2), Zenon and others using Monarchy have taught me to re-evaluate my EL stategy as put forth in the guide. What really convinced me was that earlier Trade was possible when using early Monarchy. Another key was how well Monarchy can work when used with Marco Polo's. All you have to do is get 2 or 3 more techs by trade to equal or beat the faster research pace of Republic. One thing I still am debating is whether using Pottery and HG pay off in the long run, since I'm doing pretty well without either so far in my #4 large map game. |
Another benefit to early Monarchy is less food eaten by settlers, allowing quicker regrowth of producing cities or more shields. I'm not sure celebrating Monarchy (via Pottery and HG) are worth all those Salt camels; consider Monarchy a temporary diversion on the way to Republic. My first EL games were Monarchy-Trade-Republic; my latest attempt at Early Republic was spoiled by going Early Trade -> Early Republic. I think I want to try ER again, but I'd like to have a look at the nearby terrain and size of continent in #5 before committing. I think there is a terrain factor in making a final decision.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
solo
|
|
Lowell, MA USA
Jan 2001 time: 05:27
|
|
Elephant,
All good points and I agree. Tribute obtained under Monarchy is another good reason to use it first, but there's a temptation to dally and defer a quick switch to Republic once AI treasuries have been depleted.
I did a little research on tribute. A short test tells me that if I am Supreme, all I need is more units than an AI on the same continent to guarantee tribute. Quality does not seem to matter, so use cheap warriors to build a majority and to enforce early happiness and safety. Later they can be transferred to the SSC and used to help rush caravans and improvements, which can make this process much more efficient.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Elephant
|
|
Phila PA
Aug 2002 time: 00:27
|
|
There are some "rules of thumb" for tribute amounts: nothing if their treasury is under 50g, 25g if between 50 and 99, 50 if between 100 and 149, etc. If accompanied by a tech gift the attitude usually stays the same, if not it often (but not always) will slip a notch. I usually try to ask every third turn, but have seen others do it every other with only a few more "gripes".
I have often wondered if there was a breaking point for number of units; knowing quality does not matter is also very valuable. Is there not a "trigger" mechanism that you need at least one city on their continent? That was the other thing I was wondering about. "Marco Polo contact only" definitely does not work.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
solo
|
|
Lowell, MA USA
Jan 2001 time: 05:27
|
|
I ran another quick test, and was able to collect without having a city. All I had to do was have more units on their continent. However, below Supreme, things may be different. In all tests, I had to wait a turn after adding or subtracting units so that the AI's "estimate" of my military strength could be updated on their own turns.
The amounts you list are typical, but I often get different amounts, e.g. 100 gold when they only have a little more or 50 gold for treasuries between 50 and 100. I think the amount they will part with has something to do with their characteristics, with agressive civs being the stingiest.
Once in a while I'll get 25 when an AI is between 25 and 50, too, but watch out under 50, because you may get a useless tech instead.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Elephant
|
|
Phila PA
Aug 2002 time: 00:27
|
|
Techs are the killers: I often stop asking when they have several I am trying to skip. Especially Pottery...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
solo
|
|
Lowell, MA USA
Jan 2001 time: 05:27
|
|
Monk,
I have downloaded your game and will take a look, but the improvement of your health is the best of news.
Maybe we can start another comparison game in the near future to help celebrate.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|