Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > 1975: Saigon surrenders
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (9): [ <<   6   7   8   9   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:27
  Old Post 07-05-2003 09:18
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#241 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

It's a simple one-liner, with no background at all, that says that the SC will no longer be "seized" of the Complaint of Aggression by North Korean.

gsmoove23 is offline gsmoove23
Warlord

Oct 2002
time: 05:27
  Old Post 07-05-2003 09:26
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#242 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

Once the objective of the Korean War became the unification of Korea, after the security of South Korea had been assured I think it could be considered a war of aggression. Of course the SC wouldn't recognize this because it was an active participant. I'm sure the resolution wouldn't have passed if the Soviets had been there, as it was the UN was very much a tool of western democracies against the "evil" communists without the Soviet veto. It was a much different organization during the Cold War.

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:27
  Old Post 07-05-2003 09:39
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#243 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

I agree. Once the NK had been defeated, the UN SC resolutions were satisfied. I think we had a major problem trying to get the SC to condemn China's intervention. Uncle Joe would have not of that. So all we could do is take the whole issue off the table. From that point on, the US and allies were a "coalition." I do not know if we even used the blue UN helmets and flags anymore, if we ever did.

It was during this time that Truman failed to back MacArthur's request to go over the border on reconnaissance missions. Trumans was trying to be as circumspect as possible in order to get the votes in the SC. He obviously did not succeed.

gsmoove23 is offline gsmoove23
Warlord

Oct 2002
time: 05:27
  Old Post 08-05-2003 00:46
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#244 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

As I understand it from start to finish the Korean war was a UNO operation with only 85% US military forces, but nice try. The UN was probably less willing to go along, but they did.

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:27
  Old Post 08-05-2003 00:55
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#245 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

quote:
Originally posted by gsmoove23
As I understand it from start to finish the Korean war was a UNO operation with only 85% US military forces, but nice try. The UN was probably less willing to go along, but they did.


gsmoove, perhaps we need someone like Roland to step in here and tell us the cosequencies of the Jan. 31, 1951, resolution, but I think that Korea ceased to be a UN authorized operation on that date. The US forces on the border today are not UN peacekeepers, which they would be if the UN were "in charge" throughout the conflict.

gsmoove23 is offline gsmoove23
Warlord

Oct 2002
time: 05:27
  Old Post 08-05-2003 00:58
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#246 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

quote:
Originally posted by Ned
It's a simple one-liner, with no background at all, that says that the SC will no longer be "seized" of the Complaint of Aggression by North Korean.


I believe you've mistaken the statement. It is meerly saying that the UN will not discuss the complaint the NORTH Koreans have brought about agression. Meaning the NORTH Koreans are complaining and the UN will not listen to their whining. At least thats how I read it. The Korean War was fought by the UNO throughout.

Joseph is offline Joseph
Prince
Ca. USA
Feb 2000
time: 21:27
  Old Post 08-05-2003 06:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#247 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

quote:
Originally posted by gsmoove23
Now I'm sure the Soviets were quite happy to allow the chinese and americans to go at it as long as the soviets sat on the sidelines and I'm sure there are plenty of Kremlin documents that say this but Stalin was hardly in the position to dictate policy to Mao and Mao was hardly disposed to taking orders. BS plain and simple.

You have so much to learn, and I don't mean that as a slap in the face.
Josef and Mao were in a partnership, and Josef was the senior partner. Without Josef, China was nothing, and I mean nothing. Every gun, missile, ship, tank, and airplane was soviet supplied. Think man, this was 1950, Mao and Company had only been in charge one year and yet to consolidate his hold on all of China. If Mao did do what Uncle Joe said, he would cut off all of his aid. Without his aid the ROC could have invaded anytime they wanted to. With his aid, ROC had no change in hell invading.

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:27
  Old Post 08-05-2003 07:00
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#248 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

Also remember that Joe gave Mao detailed plans plus enriching equipment needed to make a nuclear bomb. China would have eventual made their own nukes but given Mao's fondness for reeducating "stinking intellectuals" it would have been a long slow process. Stalin set them up as a show of international communist solidarity.

gsmoove23 is offline gsmoove23
Warlord

Oct 2002
time: 05:27
  Old Post 08-05-2003 11:02
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#249 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Joe did not fully support Mao's intervention in Korea, which is why Mao hesitated in sending his troops. Remember, as the US has learned many times, just because you're the cash cow doesn't mean you're the only one doing the manipulating. Stalin gave the support for a reason, because maintaining some influence over the chinese was important to him. Mao certainly knew this and used this meaning Joe's support hardly gained him control over Mao, just influence.

Q Cubed is offline Q Cubed
Prince
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999
time: 23:27
  Old Post 09-05-2003 11:39 Visit Q Cubed's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#250 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

wrong. joe supported mao's intervention in korea. he just didn't want to have any soviets die in the war.

gsmoove23 is offline gsmoove23
Warlord

Oct 2002
time: 05:27
  Old Post 09-05-2003 20:36
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#251 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

Stalin in no way told Mao that he wanted Mao to enter Korea. By telling him he wouldn't back him up in Korea he was essentially dissuading him from entering. There is little evidence to support what you're saying besides your opinion.

SlowwHand is offline SlowwHand
King
of The Cooler
Sep 1999
time: 23:27
  Old Post 09-05-2003 20:40 Visit SlowwHand's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#252 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

(Oh No) Here Comes a Commie
Skrewdriver

He looks to the East
Worships the Beast
Nothing but air in his head
He appears in your eyes
Peddling lies
Selling out the work of the dead
He's out there every single morning
Talking about his new day that is dawning

Oh no, here come's a commie!
Red star on his breast
Oh no, here come's a commie!
Won't you give it a rest?!

This whole land
He has a plan
To bring it all down to the ground
Confuse you with lies
Inform his spies
Brings our destruction around
He just want's to see our nations dying
His desire is for a red flag flying

Oh no, here come's a commie!
Red star on his breast
Oh no, here come's a commie!
Won't you give it a rest?!

(instrumental)

Oh no, here come's a commie!
Red star on his breast
Oh no, here come's a commie!
Won't you give it a rest?!

Oh no, here come's a commie!
Red star on his breast
Oh no, here come's a commie!
Won't you give it a rest?!
Oh no, here come's a commie!
Says his revolution is nigh
Won't you - off and die



gsmoove23 is offline gsmoove23
Warlord

Oct 2002
time: 05:27
  Old Post 09-05-2003 22:33
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#253 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

I have no words...

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:27
  Old Post 09-05-2003 23:10
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#254 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

quote:
Originally posted by gsmoove23
Stalin in no way told Mao that he wanted Mao to enter Korea. By telling him he wouldn't back him up in Korea he was essentially dissuading him from entering. There is little evidence to support what you're saying besides your opinion.


I have actually seen a lot of the diplomatic cable traffic between Moscow, Peking and NK. I think one should be able to find it on the web to give a definitive answer to the question of Stalin's support for Mao's intervention.

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:27
  Old Post 09-05-2003 23:12
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#255 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

Slowwhand, that's one song you will not hear Madonna sing.

 
Pages (9): [ <<   6   7   8   9   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27.
Apolyton Time is 00:27.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0420 seconds (88.37% PHP - 11.63% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net