 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kidicious
Towns without public transportation are small enough to walk around or ride your bike. If she's disabled or something, maybe she should move. |
sometimes you have to go to a different town (often in the smaller towns)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
The suburban/extraurban sprawls are part and parcel of the problem, though. Currently, there is a disincentive in many areas to build medium to high density areas because there is little to no provisions for increasing public transit. Here in Toronto, to use an example, the density allowed for new developments is directly linked to the public transportation infrastructure serving that area. I would imagine that similar situations are in place throughout North America.
Don't get me wrong - it's not like I think higher taxes on gasoline coupled with improvements in public transit are the end-all-be-all solution to transportation and environmental issues. But I do think that they are a necessary part of the overall solution which involves many other facets, not the least of which is reforms to local and regional planning processes.
As for most goods being shipped by truck, that's simply a matter of it being a combination of being economical and flexible. If fuel prices jumped, you'd see an increase in the amount of goods shipped by rail, especially on and intercity basis. And again, part of the problem is existing planning where manufacturing, transfer and warehousing sites tend to be based in extra-urban areas and quite spread out, increasing the reliance on the flexibility trucking can offer over rail.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Adam Smith
|
 |
Maryland, USA
Jan 1970 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
This weeks time magazine puts the number at 70%; the highest ever and the lowest number for rail since records have been taken. | Do you have a specific quote on this? I work in the office which puts out these statistics, and this doesn't sound quite right. (Usually I would see this in our media clips, and we would welcome the opportunity to make a correction if there is a problem.)
Usually transportation market share is measured by ton-miles. A ton-mile is one ton carried one mile. IIRC, rail has about 40% of ton-miles, and truck has about 36.
Could be a couple of explanations. They could be looking just at tons, or a value of shipments, either of which would give truck a larger share. Or they could be ignoring the fact that much long-distance truck traffic actually moves by rail. For example, the vast majority of all freight between the midwest and west coast is truck trailers on railroad cars. Pick the load up in Detroit, drive it to Chicago, train to Los Angeles, truck for the last part of the trip to San Diego. FOr all the shipper knows, it went by truck the whole way.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|