 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Actually maybe Kissinger sympathisers should be treated as Nazi symapthizers.
Brits should just be laughed at.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
To me, yes.
That's why Pol Pot is the worst of the worst in my book. His delirium killed -in a mere 4 years- one quarter of his population, the very population he wanted to bring good to :vomit: |
I'm not talking about which has a worse effect on the victims, but which is more evil in intent. IMO, Stalin was just as evil as Hitler, if not moreso, because he didn't kill people because he was trying to create a better world and whatnot, but rather because he felt killing those people allowed him to keep his grip on power. Selfish motivations for horrific acts are pretty evil.
There is the old question, if you could go back in time and find Hitler when he was a young man, before he'd done anything, and murder him, would you do it? I don't think those who answer yes are any more evil than someone who would murder young Hitler to steal his wallet.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Alvaro
|
|
the land of the not so free
Apr 2003 time: 05:28
|
|
Stalin's sympathesiers are quite aware of his attrocities and think that his reasoning was still better than that of the current leadership.
That is perhaps debatable but not dangerous.
Nazi sympathesiers are usually racist and violent.
Besides, what treatment are you refering to? There are nazi parties still out there...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sinapus
|
 |
Houston, Texas
Jun 1999 time: 23:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
I don't think so, because Stalin's sympathies are ot motivated the same way as nazi sympathies.
Most Stalin's sympathizers are people who were indoctrinated when Stalin was alive, or people who feel things were better under the rule of Stalin than later. I certainly don't agree with them, and I even don't understand such a sympathy can exist, but these motivations look quite harmless.
Nazi sympatists, on the other hand, advocate racial/religious/sexual/whatever hatred. They hate their fellow humans, which is a destructive behaviour, and that's why they went to nazism in the first place. OR, they can be clueless rebeles who just want to break the ultimate taboo.
Both sympathies are very different things. |
So essentially, Stalin sympathizers aren't as bad as Nazi sympathizers because the Nazi wannabes are True Believers, while Stalin wannabes are Useful Idiots?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:28
|
|
This thread is full of neo-nazi and revisionist’s bullsh!t. Unfortunately it's deep night here and I have to sleep.
Arrian, LOL
Last edited by Serb on 07-05-2003 at 23:46
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|