16-06-2003 18:50									#451
	Suffering from ads?

quote: Originally posted by Tamerlin If the French players does not wake up very quickly they will be crushed like flies...

And if you don't post the second half of that recipe, I'm staying perched right on top of the bandwagon with my lightning rod held aloft.

	17-06-2003 06:41									#452
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote: Originally posted by finbar I've forgotten who suggested the idea here - someone reputable, I recall - but it was laughed at. Providing the two refs always knew who was meant to be doing what, it would have to help the game.

Although the word reputable should obviously eliminate me I think I am the one who dared to write about this last year...

	17-06-2003 06:42									#453
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote: Originally posted by finbar And if you don't post the second half of that recipe, I'm staying perched right on top of the bandwagon with my lightning rod held aloft.

THREATS?!?...

	17-06-2003 08:10									#454
	Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

quote: Originally posted by Tamerlin Although the word reputable should obviously eliminate me I think I am the one who dared to write about this last year...

Yes, you did, and you are, indeed, reputable. Except as a supplier of recipes! But what I actually meant was that someone involved with rugby here in Australia suggested the idea earlier this year. And he was laughed at.

	17-06-2003 08:13									#455
	Full PM-box? Change here!

quote: Originally posted by Tamerlin THREATS?!?...

I've tried charm, I've tried flattery, I've even guaranteed you WRC success with my offer to disembark from the bandwagon. You've left me with no other option!

	17-06-2003 13:27									#456
	Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

quote: It certainly wasn't accidental, which I assume is what they've said

Yes they claimed exactly that. It’s a sad situation that will do nothing to prevent Wiliams rucking a players head next time.

quote: Yes, it was good, old-fashioned, legitimate rucking. Waugh got what he deserved.

And he is a tough little bugger – had a grin a mile wide on his face as the game ended.

quote: The players, the referees, the crowd were very pleased and this experience was so successful the IRB decided... not to renew it.

Well it is a very controversial idea. It would need thorough debate. Can you see it ever happening – all the top sides are now coached to use the refs blind spots I’m afraid – much as I think the SH sides set the standards on it.

quote: If the French players does not wake up very quickly they will be crushed like flies...

There is a one off game in them I am sure – what better game to make it?

quote: Presumably he wouldn't adopt the same attitude in a more important match.

Actually I’m not confident of that. It’s not unusual for him to tell refs they are wrong although he does normally marshall the side to comply with the man. The jury is out as they say.

quote: Gray's got very good hands, good reflexes, can think, and certainly doesn't lack courage. Under the circumstances, it's the best we can do.

It’s going to be fun – Woodward has targeted your scrum bringing in both young bulls to the front row – Vickery and Woodman.

I would also hope that we don’t give One-D Wendell the space around the fringe that Wales gave him.

quote: I wonder if he calls any ref "Sir" as our wee George does.

He always starts with “Sir” but it always slips to “mate” by the end.

quote: How do you prepare for Test rugby? It can't happen in S12 because of the vastly different standards within the competition.

I think it was more that the refereeing is not consistent between S12 and Test level. It seems a more marked difference than between Club and test level here from what little I have seen.

quote: Seemed to me it was their first Test for seven months and they played like it.

It is a valid argument – but perhaps not conclusive. After all they were the red hot form players of the S12 season and were playing a team right at the end of their long UK season. The exact reverse of last Novembers fixture in fact.

	17-06-2003 13:34									#457
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

I see Justin Marshall is a little bitter:

quote: "We played all the rugby - and didn't get the result, it's a simple as that.

Um no mate - you didn't play all the rugby I'm afraid. Rugby is balancing offence and defence.

Did anyone see any highlights of England A taking on Canada last Saturday? It was apparently a very solid performance.

	17-06-2003 17:27									#458
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote: Originally posted by Havak And he is a tough little bugger – had a grin a mile wide on his face as the game ended.

Yes, I'm not sure that Phil's IQ beats his boot size by much.

quote: Well it is a very controversial idea. It would need thorough debate. Can you see it ever happening – all the top sides are now coached to use the refs blind spots I’m afraid – much as I think the SH sides set the standards on it.

I think we were talking about the betterment of rugby rather than coaches' preferences. As we well know, they're not necesssarily the same thing.

quote: There is a one off game in them I am sure – what better game to make it?

Please don't get the lad's hopes up? It's taken me this long to convince him French rugby is on a par with Namibia's.

quote: I would also hope that we don’t give One-D Wendell the space around the fringe that Wales gave him.

I wonder if the betting agencies have a market on how long it will take Wilkinson to bomb him? He can only pass or run. He can't kick. Which is why we need the Roff/Larkham combo to save him in those situations. To my knowledge, he's kicked twice in two seasons of S12.

quote: He always starts with “Sir” but it always slips to “mate” by the end.

Not on Saturday night he didn't. It was glowering from the outset and obviously telling his teammates the guy was a f*ckwit.

quote: It is a valid argument – but perhaps not conclusive. After all they were the red hot form players of the S12 season and were playing a team right at the end of their long UK season. The exact reverse of last Novembers fixture in fact.

Yes, but it's their first match together. And, unlike last season's ABs, which were effectively the Crusaders, this lot's the usual mixture. We traditionally start in rusty fashion. The Ireland match was a bit of a surprise in that regard. Long overdue.

	17-06-2003 17:34									#459
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote: Originally posted by Havak I see Justin Marshall is a little bitter: Um no mate - you didn't play all the rugby I'm afraid. Rugby is balancing offence and defence.

If he means they should have had the match in the bag in the first half, he's right. They should have. But they didn't.

quote: Did anyone see any highlights of England A taking on Canada last Saturday? It was apparently a very solid performance.

No access to them. Did you happen to catch any highlights of the U 21 Wallabies -v- U 21 England? By any chance at all?

	17-06-2003 17:46									#460
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote: Originally posted by Havak Well it is a very controversial idea. It would need thorough debate. Can you see it ever happening – all the top sides are now coached to use the refs blind spots I’m afraid – much as I think the SH sides set the standards on it.

The problems are becoming so deep they will deter many long time fans if nothing is done in the near future. I know that two-referees on a field is a controversial idea, but I don't understand why it is not tested regularly and seriously in the lower divisions or competitions.

Still, one of the main problems would remain unsolved, interpretation of the laws. Without a clear set of laws and consistent interpretations in both hemispheres, two referees on the field won't add that much to the clarity of a game.

	17-06-2003 17:50									#461
	Put an end to popups!

quote: Originally posted by finbar I've tried charm, I've tried flattery, I've even guaranteed you WRC success with my offer to disembark from the bandwagon. You've left me with no other option!

I want a written angagement for both the Stade Toulousain and the Frogs.

	17-06-2003 18:43									#462
	Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

quote: Yes, I'm not sure that Phil's IQ beats his boot size by much.

Not an entirely bad thing of course.

quote: As we well know, they're not necessarily the same thing.

Very true. Would it make the game ‘better’ do you think? I think myself it would certainly hamper the continuity of the game considerably unless the second official on the pitch had a very clear and totally separate remit defined for them. And therein lies the point of most argument – what would they police?

quote: Please don't get the lad's hopes up? It's taken me this long to convince him French rugby is on a par with Namibia's.

They are, I regret to say, off the boil. But there’s room on the graph for them to reach the heights again.

That’s was a reference to Graham Henry’s reaction to Saturday by the way. Try to find the quotes yourself as they are hilarious. England apparently are (paraphrased as ever) at the ‘peak of their graph right now and won’t improve’ which of course implies they can’t play better than they did Saturday (which is laughably wrong – we did not play well last weekend!) and the ABs are a young side on a ‘huge learning curve’ who is ‘four months time will have reached their potential at the top of the graph’.

Generic meaningless (but Kiwi crowd pleasing) pap?

quote: To my knowledge, he's kicked twice in two seasons of S12.

I doubt any bookmaker would entertain the bet. He’ll get a high one nice and early. And if Aus-Eng clashes run true to form he will probably run the length and score from it.

quote: It was glowering from the outset and obviously telling his teammates the guy was a f*ckwit.

Which is shamefully disrespectful but not entirely inaccurate (certainly to the Kiwis – have they called for extradition yet?)

I think he over-psyched for the game. You see it at Tigers occasionally – the whites of his eyes glaze and you know you are in for either a huge performance or a card (pick a colour). Remember it was his first test there for England and I think it meant a lot to him (he played there for the Lions in 93 and of course famously for the Kiwi U-19 side four years before that).

quote: Yes, but it's their first match together.

And here I think they could learn one thing from us – England have periodic training camps for the 50 senior players throughout the year. Something Woodward fought hard for an was finally established early last year. It means the players and coaches are familiar with each other and the sense of ‘team’ is maintained. It helped stop us being quite so rusty in our first fixtures in the sequences of games.

But then England players are not contracted for a season of service in the same way the ABs work so maybe it is not possible.

quote: We traditionally start in rusty fashion. The Ireland match was a bit of a surprise in that regard. Long overdue.

It was a very good ‘cold’ performance. Of course we must have broken their spirit for you in April.

What would worry me is the next game seemed a huge backwards step in terms of cohesive play. Some very un-Wallaby like scenes of backs not being sure what to do next with ball in hand?

quote: If he means they should have had the match in the bag in the first half, he's right. They should have. But they didn't.

But the words he used were that they played all the rugby which is not fair. With their domination in the first half and the overall share of possession and territory they should have won of course. Crucially even a cold side should make a 2 man advantage for ten minutes tell though. That is perhaps why Mitchell has been ruthless for next Saturday – though even I was surprised McCaw was dropped from the XV starting.

quote: No access to them. Did you happen to catch any highlights of the U 21 Wallabies -v- U 21 England? By any chance at all?

I don’t think they are televised. Your boys apparently were very good indeed.

How much should we read into it? Well the core of our normal U-21 side is in Canada with the senior A side and the two Tigers lads who played the Wallabies have never played first team for Tigers (and one still scored a try). It does mean the Wallaby future looks fairly rosy – and that our strength is suspect once 74 guys are on tour elsewhere?

quote: Without a clear set of laws and consistent interpretations in both hemispheres, two referees on the field won't add that much to the clarity of a game.

There is actually a ‘clear’ set of laws and there should be no such thing as interpretation in an ideal world – you are inside the law or outside it. The ref doesn’t have the right to ignore a law because it stops play for example. But it wouldn’t take long if you looked close enough to find an obscure law that non one in their right mind would apply regularly. What we need are redefined laws but that is some can of worms – little Eddie would be in there like a shot making scrums illegal.

There’s little point in trying to debate specific interpretation here – we have proved time and again never the twain shall meet on this one.

	18-06-2003 04:51									#463
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote: Originally posted by Tamerlin I want a written angagement for both the Stade Toulousain and the Frogs.

Only if I can reserve the right to remount the bandwagons if the recipe doesn't work. And, I can assure you, if it doesn't work, it will be through no fault of mine.

	18-06-2003 08:18									#464
	Inflate your Upload Space

quote: Originally posted by Havak Very true. Would it make the game ‘better’ do you think? I think myself it would certainly hamper the continuity of the game considerably unless the second official on the pitch had a very clear and totally separate remit defined for them. And therein lies the point of most argument – what would they police?

Interesting argument. Would policing the rules make it a better game?

quote: They are, I regret to say, off the boil. But there’s room on the graph for them to reach the heights again.

Certainly not while I'm perched atop the bandwagon, trusty lightning rod handy, waiting for the second half of a recipe.

quote: I doubt any bookmaker would entertain the bet. He’ll get a high one nice and early. And if Aus-Eng clashes run true to form he will probably run the length and score from it.

Just my luck too. Lote Tuquiri has learned a whole lot more about rugby in one season than Wendell has in two. And Tuquiri has a much more rounded game than Wendell. He can actually kick. I suspect Eddie is taking him along quietly for the moment, blooding him, probably with a view to using him in the Tri-Nations. And if that works out, using him in the WRC.

quote: I think he over-psyched for the game. You see it at Tigers occasionally – the whites of his eyes glaze and you know you are in for either a huge performance or a card (pick a colour). Remember it was his first test there for England and I think it meant a lot to him (he played there for the Lions in 93 and of course famously for the Kiwi U-19 side four years before that).

Well, I'm perfectly happy for England to play the same spoiling game they did against the ABs as long as the ref penalises it as happened on the weekend. We just have to avoid getting frustrated and giving away penalties ourselves.

quote: And here I think they could learn one thing from us – England have periodic training camps for the 50 senior players throughout the year. Something Woodward fought hard for an was finally established early last year. It means the players and coaches are familiar with each other and the sense of ‘team’ is maintained. It helped stop us being quite so rusty in our first fixtures in the sequences of games. But then England players are not contracted for a season of service in the same way the ABs work so maybe it is not possible.

I don't see why it couldn't be done. It would be a matter of fitting them in between S12, NPC and Tri-Nations. The same should happen here.

	18-06-2003 08:33									#465
	Put an end to popups!

quote: Originally posted by Havak There is actually a ‘clear’ set of laws and there should be no such thing as interpretation in an ideal world – you are inside the law or outside it. The ref doesn’t have the right to ignore a law because it stops play for example. But it wouldn’t take long if you looked close enough to find an obscure law that non one in their right mind would apply regularly. What we need are redefined laws but that is some can of worms – little Eddie would be in there like a shot making scrums illegal.

Then how would one define playing 'advantage'? ie: wrt duration and circumstances under?
It isn't something one can really define under the category of a 'law' hence has to be subject to interpretation - and its a segment of play few would like to see vanish.
No doubt there are many other highly 'subjective' aspects but this was the first that came to mind.
Even if laws could be 'parameterised' to the extent that interpretation was beyond the scope of a ref, I rather suspect there might be almost as much 'discussion' over the extent of the parameters as there is presently over the extent of the interpretation.

	18-06-2003 08:33									#466
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote: Originally posted by Havak It was a very good ‘cold’ performance. Of course we must have broken their spirit for you in April.

That, and it wasn't - literally - the team we played in November.

quote: What would worry me is the next game seemed a huge backwards step in terms of cohesive play. Some very un-Wallaby like scenes of backs not being sure what to do next with ball in hand?

That's the problem. We have optimists here who want to believe they were developing some sort of game plan to use against England. The reality was that as soon as we spread the ball wide, the Welshmen were in trouble against the big, quick backs. But it didn't happen.

quote: But the words he used were that they played all the rugby which is not fair. With their domination in the first half and the overall share of possession and territory they should have won of course. Crucially even a cold side should make a 2 man advantage for ten minutes tell though. That is perhaps why Mitchell has been ruthless for next Saturday – though even I was surprised McCaw was dropped from the XV starting.

Yes, they should have won and didn't. The 2-man advantage situation underlined it. I think the majority of the AB changes for this week are about trying out players and positions.

quote: There’s little point in trying to debate specific interpretation here – we have proved time and again never the twain shall meet on this one.

I have to say, having watched NH and SH refs in action down here, and having seen NH refs in action in NH matches, I think the so-called differences in interpretation have become a bit of a myth. I've seen players allowed to stray offside in NH matches, I've seen decoy runners used, I've seen the same questionable decisions in rucks and at breakdowns. I suspect the reality these days is that we have some less-than-competent refs in both hemispheres.

	18-06-2003 08:40									#467
	Full PM-box? Change here!

quote: Originally posted by ravagon Then how would one define playing 'advantage'?

One of the best examples of a ref required to use his judgement, meaning you're going to get as many different interpretations of what constitutes advantage as there are refs. Basically, it's down to the intelligence of the ref. I say no more.

BTW, I'm still waiting to see your sources for the media celebration of the Wallabies' performance against Wales.

	18-06-2003 08:52									#468
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote: Originally posted by finbar BTW, I'm still waiting to see your sources for the media celebration of the Wallabies' performance against Wales.

Channel 10's Sunday night late sports update IIRC. Don't remember the name of the thing but it starts between 22:00 and 23:00. They slotted in a few highlights of the Aus-Wales match, with comments, just before going to the AFL, at which point I tuned out.


[Edit: Now that I think about it ... which network has the coverage rights to this WRC? ]

	18-06-2003 09:18									#469
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

quote: Originally posted by ravagon Channel 10's Sunday night late sports update IIRC.

They wouldn't know rugby if a ball wedged in their clacker and exploded.

quote: [Edit: Now that I think about it ... which network has the coverage rights to this WRC? ]

7. Who covered the Wales match and whose commentators were as tough on the Wallabies as Greg Growden in the SMH.

	18-06-2003 13:17									#470
	Support Apolyton

quote: Lote Tuquiri has learned a whole lot more about rugby in one season than Wendell has in two

I don’t expect Wendell to do too well against us – but stranger things have happened. Tuquiri one shall watch with interest on Saturday.

quote: Well, I'm perfectly happy for England to play the same spoiling game they did against the ABs as long as the ref penalises it as happened on the weekend

Check out the minority of kiwis on the BBC website. England are ‘cheats’ with hands in the ruck, not rolling away and lying on the ball. Laugh? I nearly cried – that’s the best “Dear Pot – Love kettle” argument I’ve heard in a long time. It seems rather churlish to criticise a team for using tactics on you that you yourself led the way in? Eddie will no doubt do the same conveniently missing examples like Waughy’s from last weekend.

The other point though is why would England use the same game on you? They won’t be expecting the same level if challenge up front for a start.

Interesting to see the roof will be closed and Eddie is promising a fast running game. I went to University with a Saints fan (but apart from that he is okay) who just emailed me to say “Is it just me on this one or is this just further proof of SH arrogance that they think we're unable to play a running game? Or even possibly
defend against a side playing one?”.

It does bother me that there is this obsession down south with closing the roof – it;’s not how rugger should be played as far as I am concerned.

quote: It isn't something one can really define under the category of a 'law' hence has to be subject to interpretation

From memory I thought Advantage was quite clearly defined? Finbar? It would benefit from interpretation being removed from it to a great extent to stop these multi-phase advantages that plague the southern game.

quote: That, and it wasn't - literally - the team we played in November.

They never look the same side without O’Driscoll to me.

quote: Yes, they should have won and didn't. The 2-man advantage situation underlined it

And emphatically at that. I don’t mind their fans saying ‘you were lucky’ or ‘you played this aspect cynically’ as there may well be truth in that – but there’s been some Ostrich stuff flying about with fans in denial about their own performance. There is a lot of work for their forwards to do – a bit more work on scrumming and even the line out which didn’t fire well.

quote: I suspect the reality these days is that we have some less-than-competent refs in both hemispheres.

It is getting easier to see what the IRB has as flavour of the month that’s for sure. Have you noticed how all refs have eased off slightly on releasing the ball after the tackle? In November it was nanoseconds – now it seems slightly more relaxed?

Mind you if hear ‘through the gate’ again Saturday I swear I will scream!

quote: Basically, it's down to the intelligence of the ref. I say no more.

No need to. It speaks volumes.

quote: 7. Who covered the Wales match and whose commentators were as tough on the Wallabies as Greg Growden in the SMH.

I think ITV still have the RWC franchise here. Sadly they are clueless about the game so I dread this being the case.

	18-06-2003 15:52									#471
	Tired of ads?

It never ceases to amaze me how the coach of one of the most cynically professional sides in the world keeps calling on referees to be very very strict with his next opponents.

See Eddie's latest war cry here

Why is he bothering - McHugh is a whistle happy pedant from recent showings - he is after all the guy tackled by that Bok moron.

The sad thing is McHugh will be as picky with the Wallabies as he is with England. Eddie will hate him.

	18-06-2003 16:56									#472
	Inflate your Upload Space

quote: Originally posted by Havak I don’t expect Wendell to do too well against us – but stranger things have happened. Tuquiri one shall watch with interest on Saturday.

I wish he'd come on earlier against both Ireland and Wales. He's still very raw, but he's got skills.

quote: “Is it just me on this one or is this just further proof of SH arrogance that they think we're unable to play a running game? Or even possibly defend against a side playing one?”.

Tell him it's just him. Tell him he shares your national lack of self esteem. Is this the same dill who says Nathan Sharpe can't play?

quote: It does bother me that there is this obsession down south with closing the roof – it;’s not how rugger should be played as far as I am concerned.

The AFL owns the stadium, they decide when the roof is closed. It's ridiculous. It's closed more often than it's open. Games of AFL are played in bizarre, perfectly still conditions. What was interesting, though, was both rugby teams expressing satisfaction with the surface. There's about to be an AFL players' strike - well, a tad of an exaggeration, but there's extreme unhappiness - over the state of the playing surface. They claim it's (a) too hard and the players jar up; and (b) too uneven.

quote: From memory I thought Advantage was quite clearly defined? Finbar?

Here's the law:

(a) The referee is sole judge of whether or not a team has gained an advantage. The referee has wide discretion when making decisions.

(b) Advantage can be either territorial or tactical.

(c) Territorial advantage means a gain in ground.

(d) Tactical advantage means freedom for the non-offending team to play the ball as they wish.

Basically, it relies on a ref's judgement. And, as we've all seen, the judgements can vary. I doubt there's another game on the planet that leaves so many laws and by-laws to a ref's judgement.

quote: and even the line out which didn’t fire well.

Um, if that's the case, nor did yours.

quote: It is getting easier to see what the IRB has as flavour of the month that’s for sure. Have you noticed how all refs have eased off slightly on releasing the ball after the tackle? In November it was nanoseconds – now it seems slightly more relaxed?

Yep. And the tunnels in the lineouts suddenly reared their ugly heads again on the weekend. I think it's a Lucky Dip. Before the game, the ref dips into a barrel and pulls out the law he's going to enforce for the game.

quote: I think ITV still have the RWC franchise here. Sadly they are clueless about the game so I dread this being the case.

I'll recommend Poido and Buddha to them for you.

	18-06-2003 17:03									#473
	Got spare money?

quote: Originally posted by Havak It never ceases to amaze me how the coach of one of the most cynically professional sides in the world keeps calling on referees to be very very strict with his next opponents. See Eddie's latest war cry here Why is he bothering - McHugh is a whistle happy pedant from recent showings - he is after all the guy tackled by that Bok moron. The sad thing is McHugh will be as picky with the Wallabies as he is with England. Eddie will hate him.

Surely there has to be a fat drunk amongst the England supporters who will lumber onto the field and do the same job the fat, drunk Bok did? And when I connect fat drunk and England supporter in the same sentence ... I won't go on.

	18-06-2003 17:37									#474
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

quote: He's still very raw, but he's got skills.

It’s a difficult transition. Sounds like he might make it successfully.

quote: Is this the same dill who says Nathan Sharpe can't play?

Nope it’s a different Dill. The Dill who dislikes Sharpe generally really knows his rugby which is why it surprised me so much. It looks like I won’t get to make my own judgment with his knee ligaments giving grief? I assume the Bok lad will step in rather than my old buddy Justin?

Are you absolutely sure my new Dill doesn’t have a point. I’m sure some of your countrymen believe what he alleges – even if only the banana bunch so beloved of Channel 7’s producers.

quote: The AFL owns the stadium, they decide when the roof is closed. It's ridiculous

I’ve been in it with the roof closed. It’s a nice stadium, good views, walkways all round and wide aisles. Being an AFL pitch though the rugger can be too far away from certain parts of the ground. The closed roof gives it a very weird ambience and the nonks still letting off pre-game fireworks seems plain daft.

Here is hoping it’s a happier hunting ground this time (at least there is no Owen to cut a swathe through us).

quote: What was interesting, though, was both rugby teams expressing satisfaction with the surface.

Does this mean the sports require different surfaces – or does it mean some sportsmen whine less than others?

quote: Basically, it relies on a ref's judgement

So Ravagon was right. And the fact that it is open for interpretation is enshrined in the laws itself (which is interesting).

quote: Um, if that's the case, nor did yours.

Don’t recall claiming it did.

Even so the Johnson-Kay partnership worked ‘better’. Better is a subjective word and open to wide discretion in interpretation.

quote: I think it's a Lucky Dip. Before the game, the ref dips into a barrel and pulls out the law he's going to enforce for the game.

It would be hard to disagree.

quote: I'll recommend Poido and Buddha to them for you.

Might as well. No one says “worlds number one team” with the same contempt Poido injected when interviewing Gregan after the Wales game.

ITV have had problems with the commentary team. They have used Eddie Butler (Austin’s infamous ghost writer) and had a summariser last time around called Steve Smith who made an outrageous racist comment about a Tongan that got him fined by the Commercial broadcasting watchdog. I guess they are on a par with channel 7?

quote: And when I connect fat drunk and England supporter in the same sentence ... I won't go on.

Best not to. It’s all muscle I tell you.

I’m not sure our fan will be the one trying the run on to the field. McHugh has a reputation for being niggly at the scrum. On last weekends showing that is going to cause more grief to your side. I wouldn’t be surprised to see him being heavily reviled by the home crowd.

	18-06-2003 17:43									#475
	Full PM-box? Change here!

quote: Originally posted by finbar Certainly not while I'm perched atop the bandwagon, trusty lightning rod handy, waiting for the second half of a recipe.

A little written agreement and...

	18-06-2003 17:54									#476
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

SO I say "it's just you" and the Dill replies

quote: Well let's face it, if he referees the game to the letter of the law we may well be a player or two down. But as for the Aussies, they'll be lucky to be playing with a 7s team I know this is Jones not even bothering to making it a subtle reference to the NZ game and us having 2 players sin binned, but has he seen his own team play recently??? The reason we, and others, score so many penalties against them as opposed to tries is because they'd sooner give a penalty away than let anyone get quick ball and possibly score a try.

He goes on the say he thinks Jones may be gone by the RWC.

And the most ironic thing? He is a ref at amateur level.

	18-06-2003 18:08									#477
	Get a bigger avatar today!

quote: Originally posted by Havak There is actually a ‘clear’ set of laws...

No there is not, though some laws are clearly define and should not be the obect of varying interpretations (off-side, knock-ons, straight lineout throws... which, unfortunately, does not mean the referees are applying them adequately) some are not:

- Advantage (as Ravagon wrote it)
- Time before punishing a player holding the ball in a spontaeous scrum or maul
- Quickly playing a penalty
- Sweepings around mauls and spontaneous srums
- ...

But IMO the main problem is the clear laws are not applied consistently from game to game.

	18-06-2003 18:20									#478
	Inflate your Upload Space

quote: Originally posted by finbar I suspect the reality these days is that we have some less-than-competent refs in both hemispheres.

This is exactly what I am saying since last year Finbar, and your quote is especially true in France to the exception of Joël Dumé (though he is missing a game from time to time). Unfortunately, the IRB does not seem to have the least of an interest in this problem, all goes well is the best of worlds...

	18-06-2003 18:34									#479
	Inflate your Upload Space

quote: Originally posted by Havak I think what surprises me most is that England simply did not play that well. The defence was awesome and I have to admit defence won the game.

What?! No mention of the horrendous refereeing? Even your man Jonno was ready to spit the dummy!

quote: Carlos failed that first examination on stepping up to the big arena – and whilst his counterpart also had a quiet game the difference between them was Wilko could compartmentalise his kicking. Carlos should have kicked several of the chances he blew.

No doubt about it, Carlos could have won the game for us. I can't be too hard on him, however, because he was instrumental in creating the opportunity for the try.

quote: As for Mr Howlett – well I want him at Tigers is all I can say. What a player. I think Caligastia may need to conceed when he does see it that there was somewhat more than a hint of offside leading to his try though.

No way! He was just quick off the mark. Perhaps you need to conceed that the ref blew too many ridiculous penalties - therefore stifling the game into a kicking match between Wilkinson and Spencer.

quote: The Kiwis really bossed the first half and England did very well to get back on terms in the second. The defining moment for me – when we were down to 13 men and yet came good for a three point credit in that period. Fifteen should punish 13 every time – particularly in a side with the pace the Kiwi backline had. I think what pleased me most was that they were camped on our line in an offensive scrum as we put six men up against eight and they failed to make it tell – eventually conceding the penalty through frustration. That give Mitchell something he really needs to think about – as good as some of his young forwards are the claims they were already the match for the Old England work horses has been shown to be a little too optimistic. I expect changes in the Kiwi pack for the Welsh game.

Yeah, NZ choked. There is no excuse for not scoring against a 13 man team. During that 10 minutes it was nervous knock-on after nervous knock-on.

	18-06-2003 18:34									#480
	Full PM-box? Change here!

quote: Originally posted by Havak Nope it’s a different Dill. The Dill who dislikes Sharpe generally really knows his rugby which is why it surprised me so much. It looks like I won’t get to make my own judgment with his knee ligaments giving grief? I assume the Bok lad will step in rather than my old buddy Justin?

I wonder if the Different Dill saw Sharpe against Ireland and Wales. Fine games against both, in lineouts and around the ground. I doubt he saw them. Probably picking lint out of his navel. That aside, I didn't know about Sharpe's knee until you mentioned it. I just checked it out. Eddie is hoping he will play, but it would be a huge risk. Justin isn't in the squad, so Vickerman will come into the team.

quote: Are you absolutely sure my new Dill doesn’t have a point. I’m sure some of your countrymen believe what he alleges – even if only the banana bunch so beloved of Channel 7’s producers.

To be perfectly truthful, I don't think many people here would have seen England play running rugby. We had no access to the 6 Nations this year. We saw the Tests last November. You ran well against the Boks, but then you and I probably could've. You didn't run all that well against the ABs and us. In fact, that was when England seemed lost because of the problems connecting the packs to the backs. So I'm sure England can play running rugby given the opportunity. I'm sure the sensible Australian supporters would agree. I know Eddie thinks they can because he's seen them and said so. Pity more of us don't get free trips to the 6 Nations.

quote: Here is hoping it’s a happier hunting ground this time (at least there is no Owen to cut a swathe through us).

Unless he takes Vickerman's place on the bench. How much would he love that? He's been training with the squad so he must be getting fitter. But two S12 halves since last November might not be enough of a grounding. Fingers crossed though.

quote: Does this mean the sports require different surfaces – or does it mean some sportsmen whine less than others?

Mmmm. AFL doesn't have the massively physical confrontations that rugby has, but there's a hell of a lot more running at speed. A lot of the AFL players - and several of them very sensible chaps - say that it's the only surface on which they "feel" their legs by three quarters through a match. It has to be remembered, too, that all the other grounds are open-air, it's a winter sport, and Melbourne is wet in winter. So it's all relative.

quote: So Ravagon was right. And the fact that it is open for interpretation is enshrined in the laws itself (which is interesting).

Well, x number of tries, he had to sooner or later. And, yes, it's enshrined that it's up to the ref's judgement. As I said - in what other game?

quote: Don’t recall claiming it did.

Yes, I know. I've long since learned to remind you that, in most points you make, the opposite is also usually the case.

quote: Even so the Johnson-Kay partnership worked ‘better’. Better is a subjective word and open to wide discretion in interpretation.

See above.

quote: Might as well. No one says “worlds number one team” with the same contempt Poido injected when interviewing Gregan after the Wales game.

Poido commentates the way he played. No holds barred. The nice thing about having commentators is that one can see what's going on for oneself anyway. And I still think Poido's comment about the machinations of opposing front rows that I quoted a while ago - "It's a dark science" - takes the cake as one of the most astute, mordant observations I've heard about rugby.

quote: ITV have had problems with the commentary team. They have used Eddie Butler (Austin’s infamous ghost writer) and had a summariser last time around called Steve Smith who made an outrageous racist comment about a Tongan that got him fined by the Commercial broadcasting watchdog. I guess they are on a par with channel 7?

7 are a funny mix. Poido is one-eyed. Buddha can be, but can also see the other side. Dan Crowley, the new chap on the block, is very fair. Gordon Bray, 7's main caller, is knowledgeable and fair, even if he likes to dwell on the trivia - players' occupations in former lives - a bit too much. Unfortunately, he's in danger of losing the main calling job because David Leckie - the ex-Packer 9 Network supremo now in charge at 7 - thinks he's an "egg-head".

quote: I’m not sure our fan will be the one trying the run on to the field. McHugh has a reputation for being niggly at the scrum. On last weekends showing that is going to cause more grief to your side. I wouldn’t be surprised to see him being heavily reviled by the home crowd.

Bear in mind that it's being played in Melbourne. They're not rugby-educated down there. They will turn out in droves, but then they would turn out in droves for British Bulldog. Oh what a game that was at school! Anyway, don't expect much from the crowd, they wouldn't know. But if McHugh is niggly at the scrum, it will be nothing new this season. I've never seen so many re-sets of scrums and penalties that leave both packs bewildered. Yet another IRB dictum, obviously.