 |
|  |
 |
|
Havak
|
 |
Swing Low, Sweet Chariots.
Aug 1999 time: 05:27
|
|
quote: So? What's a couple of hours in a train… |
A couple of hours not drinking for starters! 
quote: Cohen, from my observation, unlike Howlett, needs to wind up. Tubbies are like that, I'm told. |

You might benefit from watching his second half try last November again then. You see that forlorn lunging AB shirt in the background – guess who it belongs to? He can’t just take him on, he can skin him. That doesn’t mean he doesn’t need the ‘fat lads start’ though before you pick me up on it. 
What a name! Glad I’m not commentating. Hmm – the English press are going to make that ‘Rocky Cocky’ – you can see it coming. 
quote: Oddly enough, everything that applies to the rest of the world doesn't apply to the parallel universe that is Leicester. |
Oh well. I have blind faith that we will sweep all before us once again. 
quote: They lost a hell of a lot when the Fitzpatrick-Zinzan-Bunce generation moved on. As happens. |
And you don’t need to remind me of the similarities we could face to that after the World Cup. 
quote: Which is your cue to remind me that he's a merchant banker. |
Or was. He seems to be happily married now. 
Do you think Tamerlin picks up on the cockney rhyming slang in that reference?
Welcome Caligastia – getting round the web monitoring? 
quote: The point I was making was that the Maori side is stronger on attack out wide, therefore the weather affected their game plan more than it did the English |
How do you know the English plan wasn’t to spin it in dry weather? You are guilty of a stereotype assumption. Believe me the players in that side were fully capable of so doing.
Nice line about the clouds though. 
quote: Come on, where's that English humor we all know and love? |
It’s still here – just taking a small break. 
Are you saying that at the instant of this move the wide line consisted of tight five players? One can see the funny side then. 
If it was the actual back line he was both rude and daft because that consisted of Balshaw, Luger, Noon and Simpson-Daniel – and they all look like they need a slap up meal to me! Indeed their opposing numbers looked far more bloaty. 
quote: As I said - well done England. A totally legitimate win. |
I hope I can be as giving should the worst happen.
The warm up words are starting to move -
check here
I could link you to English players saying similarly repsectful things - but then they are English so you know they are anyway. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
I was just reading through one of my childhood favorites (which I'm sure you will all recognise), and I thought I would share this bit:
Attachment: untitled-1.jpg
This has been downloaded 55 time(s).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Tamerlin
|
 |
Toulouse (South-western France)
Apr 2002 time: 06:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Havak
Always pleased to see a bit of Asterix. French humour at it’s finest.  |

These comics have rythmed my youth. 
Though the adventures of Asterix and Obelix are distributed in at least 39 countries I didn't knew they were so widely known... 
Unfortunately, I would have liked to claim Asterix as a french creation but as far as I remember Uderzo and Goscinny are Belgian, though the famous Gallic village is located in modern Bretagne. 
quote: Plus do red wine and Kronenbourg constitute a bar – it’s a tough call.  |
Agreed!
quote: Probably a combination of cost and the fact that it would never occur to a design engineer people might want that. I use optical mice (mouses?) with cables still (saves money on batteries). |
Havak, do you have some Scottish ancestors? 
quote: But are you saying, and I find this hard to believe, that you prefer Civ 3? Or were simply admiring the concepts? Horse was right the execution was lacking. I think you will find the structure it imposes on your play very restricting given time. The patches did change it although I didn’t give it much of a go with the final patch for the initial release – I was far too brassed off with it by then. And the expansion packs are an expensive gamble for a game that managed to alienate one initially. |
IMO, many concepts in Civ 3 are very good (though some have been ill implemented). My main concern is the lack of real armies, why have they kept this stupid combat system where you attack unit by unit. 
IMO again, cuture is a good concept, so are bombing, outposts and the strategical resources... 
What I really dislike in Civ3 is the behavior of the AI and the rude way it is cheating. The AI civs are producing scores of settlers and military units without the penalty associated with the maintenance cost of a huge army, the settlers walk through the map to colonize the areas where will appear a modern era strategical resource... a few millenia later. 
The palm of the most stupid implementation of a concept goes to "movement in ennemy territory". The concept is simple, when you move a unit in an unknow or hostile territory, your units are limited to a 1 tile movement (not very realistic either as scouts are supposed to "open the road"). Suppose you are at war with another civ and that you are allied with another civ which units have to cross your territory, which we consider as rather big, to wage war against the common ennemy. Your ally will move units in your territory... tile by tile, without the benefit of the roads or the railroads. 30 or 50 turns later, your ally have not yet reached the front, you are growing tired of this war and ask for peace with the AI Civ that you have so badly injured they are reduced to a few unimportant cities. Your ennemy accepts peace but your ally considers you have betrayed him and attack you the turn after with the myriads of (mostly) outdated units that are currently in the middle of your territory... isn't it stupid? 
Actually, the AI Civs have been programmed to use all the tricks the veteran players of Civ2 have used to crush the AI in the previous editions of the game... tricks I am not using and that I am not really interested in using. The AI is hard to beat not because it is "intelligent" but because it is heavily cheating and exploiting the gaps in the game system. 
It's like a NH team playing against a SH team, you don't know the laws that will be enforced on the field and thus can not build an efficient strategy... 
BTW Finbar, there is a Mod called Civ3 like Civ2 that you could find funny to test... and update your civ3 to 1.29f.
Attachment: civ3 like civ2.zip
This has been downloaded 0 time(s).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Havak
I will do – though I can’t find any fixtures for them before the World Cup? |
They'll be playing someone somewhere. You probably won't see them before the WRC, though.
quote: Whereas you would be thinking of all the points you make that I recycle to you a month later? |
And not a royalty charged.
quote: I think I’m still going to go Wallabies-NZ-England-France in that order regardless of the next couple of games. The venue remains crucial to me. |
The four are a safe bet. I'm not sure about the order.
quote: But are you saying, and I find this hard to believe, that you prefer Civ 3? Or were simply admiring the concepts? Horse was right the execution was lacking. I think you will find the structure it imposes on your play very restricting given time. The patches did change it although I didn’t give it much of a go with the final patch for the initial release – I was far too brassed off with it by then. And the expansion packs are an expensive gamble for a game that managed to alienate one initially. |
No, I was just admiring the concepts. I've only fiddled around playing Civ 3. The concepts of Civ 3 and demands on the player - I mean choices and options rather than playability - are much more, um, cerebral than Civ 2. Civ 2, for anyone with half a brain, is, ultimately, I think, fairly simplistic. While still a fine piece of technical and intellectual creativity. So it's enjoyable and playable and a fine creation - which explains its success and its longevity.
I obviously haven't yet run into any of the playability problems that Civ 3 poses. I've heard all about them. It seems to me a bit of a tragedy because the complexity of the concepts was a great start. As you suggest elsewhere, it probably does reveal who really did what originally.
quote: Try RoN – an RTS sure but it was designed by a team that understood a game should be accessible to newbies, allow variety of strategy and above all be FUN. Is it available for Mac? |
I keep hearing about RoN but I've never checked it out. I've never strayed from Civ 2 before this.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:27
|
|
quote: as far as I remember Uderzo and Goscinny are Belgian |
NO!
Goscinny is French (born in Paris from Jewish Pole parents as far as I recall - do a google search for Goscinny for details). I don't really care about Uderzo, who is an OK drawer, but Goscinny is the best comics scenarist and dialoguist ever. He also wrote some very good books (Le Petit Nicolas). Probably the most important figure in French and Belgian comics world (there's also Franquin).
And don't get me started on comics...
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|