 |
|  |
 |
|
korn469
|
 |
Poetic Justic
Apr 1999 time: 00:28
|
|
supersneak
quote: And AH! High five!!! We saw right through that crap, didn't we? Probably best that we live on different chunks of the planet...could be trouble if we actually hung out...but some day...some day... |
lol yea you did, and you're right about it being trouble if we did hang out 
kittenOFchaos
quote: P.S Korn are you now a convicted rapist? |
No, I plead guilty to a catch all misdemeanor. It basically could be for just about anything, from being with (or encouraging) underage people in breaking curfew or skipping school, to providing them with alcohol, to just about anything the DA can think of. My sentencing for that is in less than two weeks.
Oerdin
I first met her when I was 23 about to turn 24. I just turned 26, and when this is over, we're going to give it another try.
frogger
quote: Remember that this isn't about the parents' say-so. It's about what's victimisation and what's not. |
Exactly, I completely agree with you, though i'm not sure completely sure which reforms would be best. Although i know that there isn't going to be any reforms of this law in the US anytime soon.
If it was up to me I'd increase the weighting of the "victim's" opinions in the process, and then additionally a good fix might be to tighten the laws up even more. Increase the age of consent to 18 and even dropping the 4 year age difference clause but change it from a strict liability law. Then instead of having the law say if anyone under 18 has intercourse with anyone 18 or older it shall be a felony, make it so that in addition to the age thing, that the prosecution has to prove that actual victimization had occured, or that some kind of malicious intent existed. To me I think that this would be the best solution of all; because, if you simply go by ages and not by the actual circumstances of the relationship then either the law will be too strict and will punish people unfairly, or they will be too lienient and will fail to stop some actual victimization. If by looking into the actual facts, and basing punishment on actual instead of theoretical harm the system would function much better.
Sikander
quote: So one of the three government parties to this incident seems to have used their discretion properly, though obviously Korn is wishing that that party had been the police on the night in question |
lol, Very much so, but in the end i learned several important lessons from this; lessons i might not have learned otherwise. So perhaps this is a blessing in disguise. Though I'm sure if they give me any jail time at the sentencing (which I highly doubt) then I won't be saying that.
I also think you are absolutely right about much of the justification for this particular set of laws coming from the liberal side of the political spectrum. I think that both democrats and republicans both have an equal amount of law and order members who advocate tough laws on certain issues.
Last edited by korn469 on 18-06-2003 at 20:28
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|