 |
|
TOUGHUSAGUY
|
|
USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA!!!
I DONT WANT TO SEE THE SAVAGES FOR THE PEOPLE WHEN THE CITY COMES UP! I WANT WHITE AMERICANS LIKE ITS THE WAY SUPPOSED TO BE!
UNITED WE STAND!
LETS ROLL!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
TOUGHUSAGUY
|
|
I JUST DONT SEE NO MORE NEED FOR THE CIVLIZATOIN 4 IF THEY GONNA MAKE IT THIS ONE GOOD!
USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Captain Obvious
|
|
I would hope they include war mobilization in the new XP.
Some people disagree because they argue that in the 'real world' allies can become enemies in a heartbeat.
OK..... but in the real world, you would also have some hints that a nation is going to war with you: troop buildup at certain areas, troop movement heading in your direction, info from scouts, later satellite images, and so on.
So thats why I would include war mobilization
Any thoughts?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Captain Obvious
|
|
quote: White Americans? Savages? WTF? I have to be "white" to be "American"? What kind of KKK racist garbage is that? |
Not necessarily. Look that guy was obviously (no pun intended) a moron but I think his point was that why are we seeing only Native American people in the American civ instead of "European looking" Americans???
Most of America's population is white and lets face it, the Native Civs had no comprehension of what "America" or "Americans' were.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Azeem
|
|
Have you read this moron's previous posts?
Anyway, let's get back on topic here. What do you think about the "mobilization" idea?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Quasar1011
|
 |
Mobile AL
Dec 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
Hey, it's not my concept. The "allied healing ability" was already in Civ 2, but was dropped for Civ 3.
They dropped plenty of good Civ 2 features, believe me!
And the foreign basing concept is from someone else on these boards, can't remember where I saw it.
Another thing they dropped from Civ 2 was the Sioux civilization. Seems if they need a new Civ for Conquests , the Sioux would balance out North America a bit.
Last edited by Quasar1011 on 18-05-2003 at 20:50
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CiverDan
|
|
Regarding Fundamentalism. It was removed from the game for balance reasons before 9/11. No doubt it would have been removed after that if it hadn't already been removed by then though. I suspect the "islamic sultante" is just a "p.c." name for fundy but with different traits.
You wont see fascism since they want to sell the game in Germany.
Regarding natual events. About time..I suspect they held stuff like this back just so they could try to get us to buy another XP. I don't have RoN. bu at least it came with MP support.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Azeem
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CiverDan
Regarding Fundamentalism. It was removed from the game for balance reasons before 9/11. No doubt it would have been removed after that if it hadn't already been removed by then though. I suspect the "islamic sultante" is just a "p.c." name for fundy but with different traits. |
A "sultanate" is not necessarily a "fundamentalist" government, but a Middle Eastern monarchy. Adding "Islamic" to the name isn't really necessary as "sultanates" generally refer to monarchies of largely Muslim nations. Basically, it's nothing more than a monarchy of a Muslim nation. In a "sultanate", clerics don't really have complete control over the monarchy as would a real "fundamentalist" government would have. You could compare an "Islamic Sultanate" with the Christian Monarchies of the Middle Ages. They're religious in tradition, but there is still a ruler who is not necessarily a clergyman. Calling an "Islamic Sultanate" a "fundamentalist" government is a bit of a misnomer.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|