 |
|
SlowThinker
|
|
homeless, Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2000 time: 06:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DrSpike
You've lost me mate. |
You unmasked my weak english. Do you want to say you are stupid and I am a genius?
Last edited by SlowThinker on 24-06-2003 at 03:19
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SlowThinker
|
|
homeless, Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2000 time: 06:28
|
|
quote: I am surprised if that is the form for the defensive bonus..........it's not very intuitive, and there are several simpler possibilities that yield results quite close to that formula. |
I remember I tested it lightly (and in SP), so there may be another formula working. But I can't see any simpler possibility. The concept that the attacking dip must go over one defending dip, then the second dip, then the third is perfectly natural for me.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SlowThinker
|
|
homeless, Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2000 time: 06:28
|
|
quote: You've lost me mate. |
OK, I think I understand.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DrSpike
|
 |
Enthusiastic member of Apolyton
Sep 2001 time: 05:28
|
|
The more I think about it the more your proposed structure does makes sense. After all, 0.8*0.8*0.8 is exactly 1 - (0.2 + 0.2*0.8 + 0.2*0.8*0.8), which was the same methodology I was saying to use regarding multiple offensive dips.
Of course from a practical gameplay point of view one almost never has multiple defensive dips, so that could be why Rah has no recollection of observed bonuses, or people mentioning it for MP.
Last edited by DrSpike on 24-06-2003 at 17:12
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|