 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote: Your county???? Gettting a little micro aren't ya. |
Ouchita County is to Arkansas as Wisconsin is to the United America.
quote: Which states have the most electoral votes?
|
Calif, NY, Texas, and that annoying little nursing home state we got from spain in 1819. 2 (1.5) of them were for Bush and 2 (2.5) of them were for Gore. If more people wanted to vote for Gore than Bush, then the majority rule. Whut's the problem? Are you seeking a return to olden days where the minority held an iron fist over everyone else?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Defiant
|
 |
WISCONSIN
Aug 1999 time: 05:28
|
|
That's not the point Boris, I shouldn't have phrased it that way, we all were immigrants at one time. When my great grandparents came to this nation they literally worked the land for what they needed or died trying, now it seems a good portion, not all, get citizenship and jump on the Federal, State supplement funding ASAP.
Look at the Social Funding of America, 1.4 trillion out of 2.2 trillion budget is dedicate to Social, now that encompasses alot, such as medicade, medicare, etc., but also perpetual handouts, and I don't like it.
Your liberal class makes a point of laboring to them for votes and I believe it works. Republicans don't.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gunkulator
|
|
One of the few reasonable argument I've heard for the continuation of State's Rights is that each state can act as a mini-testing grounds for various public policies. Presumably the federal gov't and the other states can survey the effectiveness of what the states are doing and choose their policies accordingly.
The other reason for overrepresentation of small states in the Senate and the EC is to avoid the dreaded tyranny of the majority. Small states can band together and assert a greater power than they could if voting was based soley on population.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
the more i look at it the more i want state power and less federal government.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gunkulator
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
States Rights should be STRENGTHENED, not weakened. I want more state control of things, from drinking age to drug use laws. |
Unless I'm mistaken, both drinking age and drug laws typically fall under state jurisdiction - unless you cross state lines of course.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
gunkulator, you know that several pot legalization propositions are being pissed on by the federals, and that they also blackmail the drinking age to 21 with federal highway money.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gunkulator
|
|
Well, yes, if states insist on taking the drug called "Federal Aid", then they have to pay what the dealer demands. Dealers are notorious for jacking up the price once they have you hooked. Those who demand more state rights should perhaps kick their own bad habits first.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gunkulator
|
|
You can't have it all: If you take dirty federal money, I don't feel the least bit sorry that the feds set conditions you don't like. Don't take the money. Just say no.
I confess to not keeping up with drug laws. I thought some states had limited forms of legalization. On the whole, though, I see great deal of immaturity from state legislatures who suck at the federal teet in the morning and then cry like little babies in the afternoon about how mean their mommy is.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|