 |
|  |
 |
|
Poogas
|
|
I noticed in the thread "Could the US mount an industrial effort equal the effort of WW2? " (Located Here) That a lot of you know know a lot about Military machinery etc...
Just curious if any of you are going to watch the History channel special tonight named "M1 Abrams: Supertank!"
Airing Friday, June 27 @ 9pm ET/PT
Info about it can be found at http://www.historychannel.com/
"Join us as we penetrate the history of the world's most sophisticated tank--the M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank. In the most radical departure in U.S. tank design since WWII, the Supertank combines speed, heavy protective armor, and a fearsome 120mm main gun. In 1991, the new and unproven Abrams tank was deployed in Operation Desert Storm. Using night vision and laser targeting, the M1 Abrams tank destroyed Saddam Hussein's armored Republican Guard, and is again doing desert duty in the War in Iraq. TV G"
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Many of the premier MBT's of the world are similar enough that what counts is the people in it, not the coffins they inhabit. |
It depends... if it's open warfare against a conventional army, having the better tank is important. Morale for one thing - if an opposing tanker knows his gun won't work except at suicidally close range they're very reluctant to start advancing.
If it's close range stuff against an opponent with good AT munitions the tank's advantages are nullified and it becomes more important to work closely with support infantry.
Also, Abrahms M1A2 is special... maybe Leopard 2 is as good, but nothing else quite matches it. I'd put Merkava next and UK Challenger behind all. It has a whole list of niggling flaws.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Cruddy
Also, Abrahms M1A2 is special... maybe Leopard 2 is as good, but nothing else quite matches it. I'd put Merkava next and UK Challenger behind all. It has a whole list of niggling flaws. |
What is "special" about the M1A2? The biggest edge I can think of is about the electronics inside, and not much to do with the physical armor, power plant of main armament, the thing being, you can upgrade the elctronics of other machines.
The difference between, say, a M1A2 and a Leopard 2 or a challenger 2 is not as great as between, say, a Panther and a T-34/85 or a Sherman Firefly. And even at that level, best crew wins.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
When did something called the History channel turn into the channel about military hardware and WWII. I would love to turn there someday and see something pre-1900, not having to do with the history of the winchester rifle or some such nonsense.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
HAHAHAHA on that truewar site... I like how some soldiers thought RPG ambushing an Abe would result in anything more than scorched paint and them dying shortly after
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Poogas
|
|
Any of you guys watch it? Comments on it?
I kept the channel on and watched the Camoflage special aswell, the Soldier 2025 thing would awesome if they could actualy get that technology researched in time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
What i liked best about the truewar site was that it didn't show anything about the few hundred thousand troops and their equipment we "neutralized"...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Zylka
HAHAHAHA on that truewar site... I like how some soldiers thought RPG ambushing an Abe would result in anything more than scorched paint and them dying shortly after |
Which might indicate it wasn't soldiers...
Try the pix on the next page, of the burning/wrecked Abrahms...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Hey Zylka, I didn't say the site had got it wrong... I said you might have.
Found those burning Abrahms pix yet?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
The ones that weren't ambushed by delicate infantry RPGs? You can find them for me
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
I would guess both are examples of multiple RPG hits.
One RPG on it's own isn't too bad...
I wouldn't say 1st was example of mobility kill - the crew traversed the turret to point backwards for some reason. Maybe co-axial was only operational MG at the time - anyway, you can't leave a tank gun over an open fire for a few hours. It distorts and is totally useles.
I woud guess 2nd is a hit on the ammo storage (the external doors blew) BUT for some reason the DU armour caught fire... DU armour is good against kinetic rounds but can be a liability against HEAT.
And don't think I'm knocking the M1. It's the best there is right now - but it still isn't perfect.
Last edited by Cruddy on 28-06-2003 at 23:13
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
The second one was disabled first, then destroyed by US forces themselves.
We lost a total of 4 Abrams during the war: 2 near Najaf, 1 in Bagdhad, and another 1 somewhere else.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|