 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
At least it's not the knapsack on my back song. That was much worse.
The guy who wants to do it with Madonna shouldn't be allowed to have an opinion on music in general, seeing that he wouldn't know a complete lack of talent if he slept with it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
Play that funny music, white boy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
Wellington 46 - Auckland 42
What an action-packed game! Many great tries scored, and a great attempt at a comeback by Auckland towards the end. Wellington deserved to win, however, as they consistently dominated throughout the game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
France - England half time: 14 -13.
The fun thing here is that the English coaches have license to run in front of the payer who is kicking a conversion. Odious lack of sportsmanship here. The referee should have asked to retry the conversion IMO.
For the moment, the French pack looks good, particularly the front row and in lineouts. They are not able to prevent the mobile English back row to play very well, though. The English backs are very dangerous, but so is Dominici in particular. French defense, and protection of the 10 when kicking is a bit weak.
With their usual forwads, the English would be terrifying.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
France England 17 - 16
Wheeew...
It was close. The English suffered more in the second half than the first, but their defense was very strong.
There were many knocks on, because of the weather (hot, heavy, sweating).
Overall:
The English lineout was catastrophic.
The French kicker missed 2 penalties and one conversion (but this one would allow us to spend several days speaking about it - let's hear what Havak thinks of it), whereas Grayson was very good at kicking (except the last second drop-goal, but given the pressure, it was extremely hard). Overall, Michalak suffered a lot from the pressure.
Any mistake in defense is extraordinarily dangerous.
Most importantly for the French, Galthie played well.
The French scrum was stronger than the English. They took one ball if I'm not mistaken, and generally proved stronger. However, they were penalized because the English managed to trick them a bit. In particular, the English turned (wheeled?) every scrum they had before the scrum half inroduced the ball. To counter that (?), the French put some pressure, resulting in their pushing before the introduction, and a kick for the whites.
Now, with Johnson and Wilkinson, that would have been different. Till next week in Twickenham. I'm afraid the English may have a big win there, considering they should have a stronger pack. It will depend on who Woodwards wants to see play.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
mercy buckets.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
Rugby, American football - it's too obtuse for me.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
English sminglish - it's all greek to me.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
I let myself in, thank you very much.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
If I knew where else to go, I'd go there.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
I ain't leading no lemmings to no cliff. This ain't the White Cliffs of Dover, you know.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
quote: Is that really the best number 10 France have? | Mmm... Given his performance today, one would hope not. He's still young and probably not in the best of shape. His kicking in particular was awful, giving the ball to Balshaw far too often.
quote: The referee was not very consistent and did not applied some parts of the laws, as always |
You forgot to say he was a SH ref . I agree he could have whistled once or twice when players dove instead of staying on their feet.
Tamerlin, I disagree about the game being poor. The lineouts and the scrums were very good for the French. It's after the ball left the hands of the 9 that things started to get bad. The scrums in particular were great. On their own scrums, the French would always make some progress, usually with Harinordoquy taking the ball, fixing the English back row before the ball was released to the backs, whereas the English scrum struggled, lost a ball and often delivered it poorly to Healey (or he couldn't get it out right), causing them to attack with very poor balls.
I agree that defense was much stronger than offense, and there were too many knocks on. The French backline in general was quite poor and should work its set pieces a bit.
As for France in the Cup, based on this game, I'm quite confident. France will have more domination against any other team's pack, which should free our back row that was quite invisible this evening. The only team we won't be able to beat is a full strength England. Other teams packs will disintegrate.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
Maybe France is out of its deppth.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
That's right - blame it on the guy with one eye!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
France should have been able to do better in order to have a changce in the World Cup, but face it, we don't have the level. The French backline is too weak. The back row also needs to get better, as Grayson didn't suffer much pressure.
And I'm not sure it's Wilko that the English missed most. Overall, the England backs and Grayson's kicking were good, and that's where the danger (and the try) came. A good thrower or jumper in the pack would have made the difference. Not to say the whole first-team pack, for that matter.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
spartak
|
|
To my mind the real killer was the amount of turnover ball and the lack of discipline in tight. Far too many penalties given away and far too many good positions thrown away by losing the ball.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
From planet-rugby:
quote: With both sides bedecked in their bizarre new skin-tight kits, the sets of players looked more like cyclists, sprinters or rave dancers than rugby players, and with a whole host having to go off for running repairs on their figure-hugging attire, it seems work still needs to be done by the manufacturers. |
It's true those new shirts are ugly, lose the numbers in their back, and generally tear themselves apart for no reason. Ugly stuff. Give me back the old shirts anyday.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
spartak
|
|
I can't say the shirts bothered me. I was more concerned by the performance of the team. I am expecting a serious inprovement next week.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|