 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
Think of it. A thousand different cheeses (Parmasian, Chedder, feta), most of the wines (Champagne, Chianti), most of the beer styles (Pilsner, Dortmunder) and many ways of preparing meat are all named after place names. They are trying to take these phrases and descriptions out of the common language and make them mean only products they make claiming this will help avoid consumer confusion. |
Not all the claims are equal (which mean not all are equally invalid) The claims for some Cheese are far-fetched, but not all, same for the cured meats. In the wine area, you can always name wines after the grape types, which matters most I think: restrciting place names in that respect is not an issue. As for Pilsner, well, the folk in Pilsner already made sure everyone knows they are the "true" ones with the Urquell name.
quote:
The exact opposite is true though; it will create more consumer confusion and will prevent consumers from making comparasions between like products. This legislation is custom designed to confuse consumers and to line the pockets of a few European producers. |
Again, it is a claim by claim issue: not all the claims tyring to be made are valid: not all of them are invalid either.
Last edited by GePap on 31-08-2003 at 01:26
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Mad Monk
We have consumer-protection (aka "truth in advertising") laws that prevent those kinds of shenanigans. All imported food products here must be clear on nation of origin. Trying to mislead in that way here tends to make for quick lawyer-bait. |
I know that in France, there is always a more or less discreet label "Made in ...". I think that the exact place of fabrication must figure on packages in Germany, and this may be the European law (Hersh will know better than me). But like the rest, it is in small font on the other side of the package. Only picky people (like what I am with Feta) will bother reading as much to know that about their product.
quote: As an aside, when I shop for cheddar cheese, the manufacturers always note that it's a Vermont cheddar or a New York cheddar, if it comes from either of those states. It's not a requirement -- it's a marketing point. |
Well, I doubt any Danish fetamaker will ever advertise on its nationality, except maybe in Denmark Same for Chilean Champagne, or other similar things. Besides, most Feta-packagings here, despite not mentioning "Origin : Greece" blatantly, display a Greek-evoking landscape, and sometimes even a Greek flag. Despite not being an outright lie (there is no explicit mentions it has been made in Greece), it sure is misleading.
But then again, I talk about feta and I don't even think Feta should be protected about its location. Only about the recipe and the contents (Sorry, but Feta is the only thing where I am really picky... I am a tad picky with wine, but I only drink seriously with my father, who makes the selection)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
It's to late. Anyone who doesn't defend a copy right loses that copy right when a phrase enters into the common language. This is a well established legal principle and it is the reason companies like Xerox sue publications which call photocopies 'Xeroxes". They don't want to loss the rights to their mark due to lack of defending the mark.
|
And as I said before, GIs are not trademarks or copyrights. I suggest you read the TRIPS.
"None, and I do mean none, of the frivalous cases the EU is bringing up now have been legally defended ever before recently. During the centuries they were not defended they entered the language and now it is like trying to copy right the word "door" or "car"."
Legally "defended" where?
Looks like the WTO will have to rule on this.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
I know that in France, there is always a more or less discreet label "Made in ...". I think that the exact place of fabrication must figure on packages in Germany, and this may be the European law (Hersh will know better than me). |
It usually has to (Art 3 para 8 Directive 2000/13/EC), yes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
more protectionism.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Napoleon I
|
 |
Los Angeles
Feb 2000 time: 21:30
|
|
First of all, the claim that terms such as Feta and Parma have entered into common use in the English language to describe a style is simply incorrect. In fact, a quick consultation with Webster's dictionary revealed that Feta is:
quote: a white moderately hard and crumbly Greek cheese made from sheep's or goat's milk and cured in brine |
As for the principle let me give a down to earth example. Lets say, the forum crowd knows that Oerdin's posts are well-written and informative. "Oerdin's post" might even become a common phrase to describe such posts coming from anybody. However, if I publish a book, called "Oerdin's quotes from Apolyton" it would have to contain only posts by Oerdin himself, in order to accuratelly tell the buyer what he is buying. Of course, in a title like "Making posts like Oerdin" Oerdin would not be a protected trademark, opening the door wide open to products such as "Chilean Champagne", "Kentucky Feta Cheese", while simply "Champagne", or simply "Feta" would be confined to France and Greece, respectively.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
molly bloom
|
 |
Lundenwic
Oct 2001 time: 15:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
There is no end to this stupidity. Just think In addition to the items I meantioned before Bologna, Vienna Sausages, London broil, Irish roast, Danish Ham... Anything with a place name could be copy righted. |
What's a 'London broil'? It ain't British that's for sure. Broil is a term used in American English, but not British English.There is a difference between Irish Stew and say a local Irish cheese, such as:
http://www.durruscheese.com/farmhou...ese_history.htm
or Cashel Blue.
As there is a difference between a bakewell tart and a Bakewell Tart- buy a mass produced one, then eat the genuine article. Although the bakewell and cheddar battles have been lost, alas....
Anyways, the Americans sure are touchy about their liquor:
'Time to talk turkey. United States company Austin Nichols has lodged new objections to a Queensland winery’s Bush Turkey port trademark application. Nichols cited a statutory declaration from an Australian distributor who claimed customers could mistake the port for Austin’s Wild Turkey bourbon.'
http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/ippro...m#_Hlk536593029
http://www.mttamborinewinery.com.au/page11.html
The bush turkey is a native bird of North Australia. The Queensland manufacturers have politely told the Americans where to put their claim (something to do with a koala's arse, I expect...)
I have eaten very well in America- especially Washington State and California. Cheers to Ivar's in Seattle and the Stinking Rose in San Francisco. And yes, Oerdin, I think Californian producers reserve their better wines for local or American consumption- we were fortunate to get some very good bottles from a Californian vintners. We asked if they were a local product, and she said they didn't sell them out of state,
so either there or the vineyard were the only places to buy.
Here's to sourdough bread and cioppino, and feta, khoubz and baba ghanoush.
And GePap- canned dolmas! You heathen!!!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
There is no end to this stupidity. Just think In addition to the items I meantioned before Bologna, Vienna Sausages, London broil, Irish roast, Danish Ham... Anything with a place name could be copy righted. |
For the 3rd time, it's not a copyright, it's a geographical indication.
Now let's clarify what regulation 2081/92 actually says.
Art 2 para 2 lit a)
quote: (a) designation of origin: means the name of a region, a specific place or, in exceptional cases, a country, used to describe an agricultural product or a foodstuff:
- originating in that region, specific place or country, and
- the quality or characteristics of which are essentially or exclusively due to a particular geographical environment with its inherent natural and human factors, and the production, processing and preparation of which take place in the defined geographical area; |
Art 3 para 1
quote: 1. Names that have become generic may not be registered.
For the purposes of this Regulation, a 'name that has become generic` means the name of an agricultural product or a foodstuff which, although it relates to the place or the region where this product or foodstuff was originally produced or marketed, has become the common name of an agricultural product or a foodstuff. ... |
So "Wiener" has nothing to do with geographic environment, and it's a generic name. Spaghetti Bolognese, the same. Danish ham, no idea. Feta, disputable.
"I'll say it again these EU protectionists are trying to confuse consumers and attempting to prevent consumers from comparision shopping between like items. Their sole purpose is to drive up prices and harm consumers. "
So you are confused when there is no longer danish Feta? A little episode we had here was about Gorgonzola (GI or trademark): An austrian producer made Österzola, they had to change it to Österkron. Didn't hurt them because the product is good.
As for driving up prices: Yes, if demand concentrates on the GI product. That's the point of offering that opportunity to regional producers.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|