 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sir Ralph
This might be because they weren't invented or originally produced in Vienna, but in Berlin |
And we call them Frankfurter for some reason.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by vee4473
And please explain your second paragraph. |
Simple. For now, there is nearly no good American food that is well known abroad. The US only exports its crap (Mc Donald's and Burger King), so foreign companies won't use American location names to make their product more attractive (you won't see a "Phoenix Ham" abroad, whereas you see "Parma Ham" in the US).
But as the US get older, and as the American cuisine becomes better, some good products will emerge and will ultimately be linked to the location where they're produced. For example, one day, some Californian wines enter the competition of the very best. "California" will be a name associated with quality, the same way "Bordeaux" or "Champagne" are today.
By that time, China will probably sell some vinegar, calling it (and trademarking it inside its borders) "Californian". Not only will that taint the prestigious name of California into luring the Chinese consumer California is such crap, it will also bar real Calfornian producers to sell their quality wine in the Chinese market 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
vee4473
|
 |
New Jersey
Feb 2000 time: 00:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
Simple. For now, there is nearly no good American food that is well known abroad. The US only exports its crap (Mc Donald's and Burger King), so foreign companies won't use American location names to make their product more attractive (you won't see a "Phoenix Ham" abroad, whereas you see "Parma Ham" in the US).
But as the US get older, and as the American cuisine becomes better, some good products will emerge and will ultimately be linked to the location where they're produced. For example, one day, some Californian wines enter the competition of the very best. "California" will be a name associated with quality, the same way "Bordeaux" or "Champagne" are today.
By that time, China will probably sell some vinegar, calling it (and trademarking it inside its borders) "Californian". Not only will that taint the prestigious name of California into luring the Chinese consumer California is such crap, it will also bar real Calfornian producers to sell their quality wine in the Chinese market |
I understand what you are saying, but it
still would never be the overriding concern in my life.
I think that the market eventually weeds the bad from the good, and people eventually learn the good brands from the bad.
in the case of wine, the bottle clearly states where the wine grapes were grown. So if i see a bottle marked "burgundy", but the label says California (or Oregon or Australia which are better I think), I already am under no false pretense that the wine ever came anywhere near France.
And most better American wineries already do respect the location naming thing.
Most better wineries will label a wine "pinot noir" instead "burgundy", since even though the exact same grapejuice is in the bottle (I think the grape used in "burgundy" is pinot noir), they respect the the fact that it wasn't made IN burgundy, france and therefore name the wine after the grape variety itself, pinot noir.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
vee4473
|
 |
New Jersey
Feb 2000 time: 00:30
|
|
I think the gray area comes in when you compare a company with a city.
Coca-Cola would have very right to sue because of a company trademark etc.., but should a city have the same right? maybe, maybe not
I mean, a fake coca cola company would be profitting off of the name of the real company.
I know alot of you are trying to say it's the same thing....that fake parma ham companies in Canada are profitting off of the name and denying the real parma ham makers profit...
but, until an italian company actually makes a product called "genuine Italian parma" or something, and THEN someone uses that name, I don't think this is a good comparison.
It would be like every chicago deep dish pizzeria wanting to sue the company Di Giorno for their new "chicago deep dish" frozen umm...pizza... by the same name.
but because chicago deep dish is just a style of pizza and not an actual company brand or such thing, they just can't i don't think.
Prosciutto de Parma is just a ham made in a particular style in Parma, that's all. It's damn tasty, but since it just is a style of ham, and not a brand name, it's not the same comparison.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|