 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:30
|
|
Would you feel better if we name a hill after you?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:30
|
|
So the teams so far are.
Hive
Voltaire - Debating Team Leader
EZRhino
Vev
Vander
Drones
Jtsisyoda - Debating Team Leader
University
GeneralTacticus - Debating Team Leader
We'll make it so the team leaders will organise who makes which arguments on behalf of the team. Other debating team members can be added during the debate if the team is small and support is rustled up by the team leader.
I think vev wants the format of the debate to be fairly unstructured with respect to rules. However, the judges probably won't like it if your team starts making random posts during the debate and your arguments are fragmented.
Anyway once the topic is finally decided I'm guessing the debate can finally get started.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:30
|
|
So the teams so far are.
Hive
Voltaire - Debating Team Leader
EZRhino
Vev
Vander
Drones
Jtsisyoda - Debating Team Leader
University
GeneralTacticus - Debating Team Leader
AdamTG02
CyCon
Corellion - Debating Team Leader
Peace
Foolish_Icarus - Debating Team Leader
Makahlua
The judges are.
Provost Harrison - Head Judge
Mead - Volunteer Judge
Hercules - Peace Faction Judge
Tassadar - Hive External To Faction Judge
CyCon, Drones & University can still submit a nomination for a judge.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:30
|
|
quote: Vev wrote:
So is the Uni happy to team up with Jtsisyoda? |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:30
|
|
We might need to add in time limits between speakers to prevent stalling.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mead
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kody
We might need to add in time limits between speakers to prevent stalling. |
I make several housekeeping proposals to enhance the flow of the Debates.
Below are the guidelines of the debate that were posted earlier:
VEV'S POST - BEGIN
As there appear to be some interest in an interfactional debating contest. The point of this event is to generate more a lively ACDG atmosphere and factional culture. The main point is to have fun, be creative and generate good convicing arguements. There would be different tones of debating, from humorous to serious ones. Participants are encourage to roleplay their faction and use factional philosophy.
Here are some guidelines for the debate.
* 4 days are given for both sides to present all their arguements. After that the debate is closed and any points presented after that time is ignored by the judges.
* There are three independant judges who will review and judge the debate within 3 days after the debate has closed
* Members outside the two factions are not to participate during the 4 days.
* But after the 4 days, any observer may comment any points they wish on the debating thread.
* Well structured arguements and a conclusion is recommend as ultimately it is the judges who have to read through all the posts. So make make their job easy and fun for them.
* Having fun and roleplay is recommended too
__________________
Promoter of Public Morale & Commissioner of General Security for the Hive
VEV'S POST - END
My proposals:
I note that more than four days have elapsed from the time of the first Posts in the debates. Vev started the Hive v. Uni Debate on 18-09-2003 at 08:00. johndmuller started the Cycon v. Peace debate on 18-09-2003 at 10:48.
In the interest of making this as transparent as possible and because I have not PM'd, or been PM'd, by any of the other judges yet. I make the following proposals here.
1. We give more time to the Debaters for the current two ongoing Debates.
2. For future Debates we allow for a specific number of arguments from each side. I suggest four from each side (Opening, Main Case, Closing, Rebuttal). This does not mean that both side has to make four arguments - they can waive any of the turns they are entitled to.
3. Just like PBEM, the teams decide what the are going to post, arrange their argument amongst themselves, and then they post the 'argument/turn/save'
4. We give each team a specific number of hours in which to respond to the other side's argument (I suggest 72 hours). They can respond earlier, but, if they are late they waive that turn.
Please let me know what you think. I do not know the mechanics of how we will adopt these above four proposals, but I think if there is a consensus amongst the competing teams and the judges to adopt them or a modified version we will do so. I think if we reach a general consensus it will be fine. Let me know if you feel we need a vote.
Mead
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:30
|
|
Links for the currently running debates. For anyone that is just interested in watching the debates, but not the other ACDG spam.
Hive vs University & Drones - nervestapling is perfectly safe.
http://apolyton.net/forums/showthre...&threadid=97064
Cycon vs Pirates - cycon's parrots are better than pirate's parrots
http://apolyton.net/forums/showthre...&threadid=97052
_____________________________________
Provost Harrison,
The debates are going rather slowly so you didn't miss much.
Last edited by Kody on 25-09-2003 at 04:27
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mead
|
|
Judges Please Check Your PM's
In the PM traffic I am proposing to the Judges that we wrap up the first two debates and begin Deliberations.
The PM traffic discusses housekeeping details of the deliberations.
Contestants, because we are considering closing the time for new arguments from each side please let us know if you need more time.
Mead
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|