 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Andydog
|
 |
London
Jan 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Havak
You came within three of beating us all right - in your home patch and with us missing several current first choice players (Flatman and Vickery were missing injured, Corry and Dawson are now seemingly first choices, Robbo is back at fullback whereas Lewsey was then.). Could I be a sports writer maybe? 
|
Okay, I'll take a nibble. That June game in Wellington 15-13 to England was rubbish. Dickinson refereed appallingly, dishing out 33 penalties and effectively robbed the game of any flow whatsoever. We got the only try, with a new team starting at the beginning of our season, when you were at the end of yours. Our No 8 So'oialo was ruled to have made a double movement after taking a quick tap near the try line, another bollocks call that robbed us of another try.
England won because they showed the value firstly of experience, but also of goal kicking. Wilko kicked four from five, plus a drop goal, for all of his side's 15 points, Carlos Spencer struggled in the swirling conditions, landing just three from seven.
England showed enormous character, but in terms of playing actual rugby and putting together phases and implementing patterns, neither side was able to get past the first phase as Dickinson whistled the house down.
Nobody could walk away from that game and proclaim who was the better side.
Yuck, this bait tastes of pork, I think I'll spit it out now. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Andydog
Okay, I'll take a nibble. That June game in Wellington 15-13 to England was rubbish. Dickinson refereed appallingly, dishing out 33 penalties and effectively robbed the game of any flow whatsoever. We got the only try, with a new team starting at the beginning of our season, when you were at the end of yours. Our No 8 So'oialo was ruled to have made a double movement after taking a quick tap near the try line, another bollocks call that robbed us of another try.
England won because they showed the value firstly of experience, but also of goal kicking. Wilko kicked four from five, plus a drop goal, for all of his side's 15 points, Carlos Spencer struggled in the swirling conditions, landing just three from seven.
England showed enormous character, but in terms of playing actual rugby and putting together phases and implementing patterns, neither side was able to get past the first phase as Dickinson whistled the house down.
Nobody could walk away from that game and proclaim who was the better side.
Yuck, this bait tastes of pork, I think I'll spit it out now. |
Now this guy could be a sports writer!

|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Andydog
|
 |
London
Jan 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
You think it was double movement, well I don't think it was. You think our try was scored from an offside position, and again, I don't think it was. Nor do I think it's fair to suggest that the Kiwis are traditional infringers, nor to suggest that Kiwis are always shoving our victories down everyone's throats. Every country is guilty of that.
But all that aside, I'm sorry but your claim that the better side always wins is absolute bollocks. There is a concept called luck, and luck plays a big factor in rugby, and sometimes luck goes against those who play better, and sometimes it results in the better side loosing. I'm not suggesting this was the case in that game, just making the point.
Back to that particular game however, consider this. It was a typical season opener by the All Blacks. There was a lack of cohesion in the partnerships of the new combinations. We also lacked composure at times and rhythm and our attack got a bit fragmented. However, we did show an improved lineout and a solid forward effort to earn more than enough ball to attack England. It was our young backline failed to fire on that evening, and look how far they've come since then.
I think you underrate our forwards. Australia may have an average forward pack, but that last Tri Nations Bledisloe clash had them playing their hearts out against us, and we still dominated and displayed some great phases of forward play.
The way I work it out, we are likely to face Australia in the semi and you either France or the Boks. I pray we see each other in the final so we can see how our forwards fair against yours, and which style will triumph.

but not really that

|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Havak
Lest we forget which hemisphere led in the blind rush to Professionalism in Rugby Union check this out
|
Sorry mate, your link doesn't work.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by finbar
The restraint of trade notion is interesting. George would have been aware of the arrangement when he signed his contracts. It will be interesting to see what happens. |
Interesting...although it obviously is, I hadn't thought of the Super 12 as being so international. Though he isn't playing for the national team, the games are still (mostly) international.
I suspect ole Georgie will be forced to play by the rules. Fair enough too - he is free to choose whether he wants to accept the terms of the contract or not.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|