 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
Sorry Ming...
Anyways back to the topic,
Does anyone think that Syria will reconsider its support of terrorist groups now that Isreal is willing to attack it after a terrorist attack?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
Well the United States can veto any resolution that is anti Isreal and prevent the UN from doing anything really.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:31
|
|
Oh god, not the UNSC argument again. 
Look, people, whatever your position is, I think it's rather obvious that the decisions of the UNSC doesn't represent what is right, moral, lawful, or whatever. It represents one thing, and one thing only: The interests of the security council members, mostly the 'real' ones, the permament veto-wielding members.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Menlas
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
Oh god, not the UNSC argument again. 
Look, people, whatever your position is, I think it's rather obvious that the decisions of the UNSC doesn't represent what is right, moral, lawful, or whatever. It represents one thing, and one thing only: The interests of the security council members, mostly the 'real' ones, the permament veto-wielding members. |
Yeah, and that is exactly what I said about USA and Israël 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sirotnikov
|
 |
<--- Yes, It's a "kitty" in a boot.
Feb 2000 time: 07:31
|
|
Olaf, there doesn't necessarily have to be a direct link between her and the training camp.
The terrorist "girl" was working with the Islamic Jihad, as did her late brother, whose death she was avenging. The IJ provided her with the charge, guidance, resources, training and what she needed.
The top political leadership of the IJ sits in Syria, and it's main offices is in Damascus.
The training camp near Damascus is used by Palestinian terrorist groups to train some of their militants. Among others it is used by IJ militants.
Bombing the training camp was a direct signal to the Syrian leadership of the Islamic Jihad, that if they think they can escape punishment since they are in Syria, they are wrong.
Israel simply started with that camp because it is clearly a terrorist militant target, and because it would create a political mess if they straight out attack an Islamic Jihad HQ in the middle of a street in Damascus.
Israel has been targetting Hamas leadership and has managed to decrease hamas activity in scale and efficiency since most of their time is spent on hiding.
The Hamas also btw have a senior political leadership in Damascus. 
This step as I learnt, was chosen as part of a new policy to target Islamic Jihad, and Hamas targets abroad, which was decided upon after the terrorist attack on a Jerusalem bus in August. The same meeting where it was decided that Arafat will be expelled.
The government hints btw that this attack doesn't mean that the Israeli actions are over, and that Arafat may (or may not) wake up in another country, one of these days. Or not wake up at all.
Btw, he has been reported to be quite ill recently. Palestinians say he caught something from one of his visitors.
Also interesting to note, that as I predicted, after this terrorist attack, not a single political figure called Israel requesting not to banish Arafat..
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
as loing as israel continues the ocupation it is guilty in the eyes of the world |
What about Syrian occupation of Lebanon?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|