 |
|  |
 |
|
JCG
|
 |
between a rock and a hard place
Feb 2002 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Why would they fight if they know that they are not defending Cuba from conquest by a hostile power, but instead are defending communism from freedom! I have a hard time understanding why the common man would fight so hard for slavery. |
Because, despite all the stuff that is evidently wrong with it, it is NOT slavery and actually gives SOME tangible benefits to the common (non-opposition) man (as opposed to the standard capitalist-republic, which doesn't unless you're a world power/superpower or the "darling" of one of those....and we're talking Third World here).
In essence, many Cubans, while they may not exactly adore Castro's guts, appear to think that "better the devil you know" (of course, it doesn't help that they also knew the OTHER devil once, or at least one of its faces...and aren't/weren't exactly pleased with it back then)...
Btw, I'm not defending this position; just trying to explain it. Big difference.
If any "liberation" was to be done, it would have been much easier under Eisenhower or Kennedy (if he actually cared less about his PR and more about the issue at hand, for example...the USSR didn't make such considerations when they invaded some of their satellites), for example.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Because they'd know that they were defending themselves from conquest by a hostile foreign power, and that despite the problems with their system, it's better than what they had when Americans ran the country last time. Plus, they can look around the rest of the Caribbean and see that they are better off than everyone else, even if they don't have what Americans call a democracy.
Lord only know's why I try and explain these things to Ned. He's congenitally incapable of believing me. |
Actually, there is a very good argument for not simply withdrawing from Cuba after "liberation," and that is Peuto Rico. We should give the Cubans the option of becoming Americans with the same status as Peuto Rico, a full fledged State, or completely independent.
Looking back at history, it was a tragic mistake for Congress to pass a statute that we could not annex Cuba from Spain just to show the world that we were liberating Cuba then. We had no such pledge wrt Peuto Rico. And, look at what happened. Peuto Rico is one of the best of the Latin America "countries." Cuba is the worst - except for perhaps Haiti.
Also, I really enjoy Che and others stating with such certainty that the people of Cuba would fight us because the hate Americans, etc., etc., etc. What one sees in virtually ever formerly-communist country is an immense love and appreciation for the US. Who is Europe beside Britain was more behind us in the recent war? No one excelled in pro-American zeal than the formerly communist countries.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Actually, there is a very good argument for not simply withdrawing from Cuba after "liberation," and that is Peuto Rico. We should give the Cubans the option of becoming Americans with the same status as Peuto Rico, a full fledged State, or completely independent. |
1st off, Puerto Rico is a ****-hole. 2nd off, we never gave the Puerto Ricans a real choice. 3rd off, you're showing your true colors, that of the arm-chari imperialist. You don't give a damn about Cubans, you just want to see another star on the flag.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:31
|
|
Actually, Ned, AFAIK, we never broke off relations with Chile, though we may have cut them off from military finacial aid.
We didn't start breaking off relations with Cuba until they nationalized some American owned businesses. The problem for the U.S. was that the Cuban government offered the companies twenty-year bonds based on the tax-assessed value of the companies. As the companies, under Batista, had been responsible for telling the government what they were worth, they had been low-balling their actual prices for years. They had been cheating Cuba on taxes for years, but when it bit them in the ass, they wailed to the U.S. government, who promtly slapped sanctions on Cuba. This went back and forth for a couple of years until fnially the U.S. broke off relations and Cuba said, fine, we'll sing a defense treaty with the U.S.S.R.
Really Ned, you need to learn some history.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
But it seems clear that we still want "fair" payment for the US property confiscated, and we want democracy and freedom in Cuba. |
They were offered what they told the government what they were worth. That's fair. AFAIK, the checks are still sitting there, uncashed.
And please stop talking about freedom and democracy in Cuba. The U.S. doesn't give a damn about freedom and democracy in Cuba except as a club which it can to bash over Cuba. If they really cared, they'd stop being hostile to Cuba, and take away Cuba's very valid reason to exist in a seige mentality.
The U.S. hardly blinked when Fukimori made himself dictator in Peru. They welcomed a coup d'etat against the elected president of Venezuela. We're allies of Saudi Arabia and all the other gulf states. We're allies of Pakistan, Egypt, Morocco, Turkey, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|