 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:31
|
|
quote:
That's ok, because the "God" of the Bible is not referring to the same deity as Yahweh of the Torah .
|
You enjoying yourself, Imran?
Christians do not claim that they worship a different God, they just believe that Christ is the promised Messiah, while the Jews believe that the messiah is yet to come.
One could even say the same thing about Allah, in that the difference between Christians and Muslims is that the Muslims see Muhammed as the latest prophet of God, and that Jesus is just another prophet, like Moses.
All three of the peoples of the book trace origins to Abraham. In that the God of Abraham would be both the God of Isaac and of Ishmael.
quote:
I think it is the opposite. Certain Calvinisits believe that God predestined certain men to be SAVED from the beginning of time. The difference is subtle, but important.
|
Good. I'm impressed. Calvinists are very careful to say that God has certain peoples' names written in the book of life. It can be a very comforting thought to those who are already Christians to be among the elect, that this is where they were meant to be, for all time.
Now this does noy preclude any people from being saved since how do we know whether one person is or is not in the book of life?
Shi, I suggest you brush up on Calvinism. Just as Catholics do not believe in works being the route to salvation, neither do Calvinists consign people to hell.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:31
|
|
quote:
Since Muslims believe that they are following the "true" and most recent revelation, as opposed to Jews and Christians (just as Christians claim something similar over the Jews) who have "imperfect" ones, in essence there's just been a lot of co-opting and "retconning" going on....not really 3 different "Gods"...since none of them contemplates that.
|
JDG:
Muslims, unlike the Christians have far less justification for their revelation supplanting the old, than the Christians did for the Jews. No Muslim claims that Muhammed is Allah, yet Christians believe that Christ is the Son of God. Muslims believe that the bible corrupted the teachings of God, and is therefore unreliable, whereas the Christians acknowledge their debt to the Jews insisting the Jesus fufills the prophecies in the Old Testament.
Why should one believe Muhammed over Moses and all the other prophets?
Rather, there's 3 very different interpretations and traditions with a few similar points, who have come to believe in 1 single deity and accept a certain amount of shared history/historical relationship with it, common to all 3 (again, mostly retroactively co-opted, but viewed as "true").
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:31
|
|
Oh, and Ben:
http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calvinism
I'd like to point to the part that says 'Liberal Reforms'.
Another revision of Calvinism is called Amyrauldianism, "hypothetical universalism", or "four-point Calvinism", which asserts that Christ's death atones for the sins of all men, but only those who repent and believe are elect and receive forgiveness. This doctrine was most thoroughly systematized by the French Reformed theologian at the University of Saumur, Moses Amyraut, for whom it is named. It was popularized in England by the Reformed pastor Richard Baxter, and gained strong adherence in the Presbyterian church in American colonies, during the 17th and 18th centuries. In the United States, Amyrauldianism is the most common form of Calvinism current among evangelical churches. Baxter himself differentiated his proposals from those of Amyrauldianism, on several rather subtle points. Baxter's influential form of hypothetical universalism is often called neonomianism, and is generally considered a milder proposal of reform than Amyraut's version.
Basically the idea that all believers are among the elect is a Liberal Reform of Calvinism. The original idea is that only the elect are saved and not all believers are part of the elect.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: The God of the Bible teaches salvation through grace. Allah teaches salvation through works. |
Catholics believe in salvation through works.
also, Arab Christians refer to God as Allah... yall do realize that 'God' is just the Germanic word for a supreme deity, right? it's different in other languages...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
IIRC Christains are saved through grace by accepting Jesus Christ as their savior, but it is expected that a true Christian will show himself through what he does, verbally and physically. It seems to me hen that it is more correct to say that Christians are saved through both grace and works.
Aren't there supposed to be 7 routes of salvation for Muslims?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|