 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
Seabiscuit and Lost In Translation are a couple of the dark horses in the nomination race.
There is a negative buzz around Last Samurai. The film looks like it won't be profitable before DVD sales, based on current estimates.
It has almost no industry momentum.
So, while it could make it, its unlikely at this point.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
quote: redefined the genre |
How did SPR 'redefine' the genre? How was it much different from those that came before it? Was it well acted, yes. Was it epic, somewhat. I'll still take 'Bridge over the River Kwai'. |
Bridge of the River Kwai is indeed a classic. Its starting to age now, especially from a presentation standpoint. Society has moved on since Bridge was released, and people connect differently now with that subject matter than they did then.
SPR has a great presentation... both great visuals... high def, great grain and contrast... and a great sound presentation... one of the best DTS mixes of recent years.
The film wasn't intended to be epic. It was intended to be about saving an individual soldier in the midst of a massive situation. The characters were powerfully portrayed and the messages about war resonated powerfully.
The film industry liked it so much, in fact, that it spawned something that could be called an epic... the dramatization of "Band Of Brothers". That series is undoubtedly the definitive film version of Easy company in Operation Overlord.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrBaggins
I've got both DVD's. I feel by no small measure that SiL is good but is ultimately obvious and has no standout performance. It has an excellent screenplay and script, but thats not the same as it being a great movie. Its... nice. Thats the most praise I can heap on it.
In SPR, Hanks, Sizemore and Goldberg were simply ashonishing, not for just the first scene, but all the way through. The direction, cinematography and sound editing were flawless in SPR. The movie had depth and meaning, and redefined the genre, which had been bereft of any quality for many years hence. |
I totally agree. Saving Private Ryan had great performances throughout. It's cinematography was unsurpassed. It was a truly great film -- but it didn't have what women like and that is romance. That is why Shakespeare in Love won.
Annie Hall was a mediocre film at best. In any other year, it would have had little chance of even been nominated for best picture. There's no way to this film is anywhere near as good as Star Wars.
Chicago had lousy music, poor acting, a horrid plot and a few well photograph dance numbers that were exceedingly booooooooooring.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stefu
|
 |
CLOWNS WIT DA DOWNS 4 LIFE YO!
Jan 1970 time: 07:32
|
|
Just back from seeing.
The obligatory list of minor quibbles:
- I'd have liked some more eagles. Now we just get a few pansy eagles pestering the Nazgul, so Pippin/Merry's (I tend to confuse the two, forgive me) cry of "Eagles!" seems a bit useless. Then again, it doesn't really work as well as it should without Hobbit's "Eagles" scene.
- A dire miss, which would have been easy to do - "Preee-ciiii-ooouuss... *fwoowf*"
- Denethor's death was a bit dodgy, especially with Gandalf pushing him into the pyre.
- Shelob... I agree, I agree, she was fine, but she could have been just a *wee bit* bigger. I know, I know...
However, I *definitely* didn't miss the Scouring of the Shire. I liked it in the book, but in the movie, it wouldn't have worked. Three words - Big Fat Anticlimax. Big... Fat... Anticlimax. On this issue, I feel, the Tolkien purists are completely wrong.
quote: Nor of Samwise the Mayor. |
What, are you saying you didn't pay attention to what Frodo was writing to Red Book of Westmark? Fer shame!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:32
|
|
Oh, and by the way. When talking about great films (as opposed to enjoyable movies), Star Wars (any and all of them) doesn't even get invited to the discussion. Those films sucked honestly, the first one only barely ranking above putrid. Sure they were fun (kinda) when I was 15 and saw them at the theatre, but I could tell immediately that they were going to be sequalized and muppetized.
Annie Hall isn't even Allen's best comedy, but it is a good film as are many of his films. I prefer a number of Allen films over this one, especially Manhattan, Love and Death, Deconstructing Harry, but I have no objection to Annie Hall's oscar. I find it much more appropriate than so many other selections.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
most decadently rich and beautiful cinematography of all time? you need to be watching more films... its a long, long way down that list
some of which include:
Barry Lyndon
The Last Emperor
American Beauty
The Man Who Wasn't There
O Brother Where Art Thou
Eyes Wide Shut
Gandhi
All very visually lush, with decent, if not great transfers.
As for true greats... Barry Lyndon was truely astonishing for its accomodating that lighting, The Man Who Wasn't There for the better-than-noir noir... film process has improved such a lot since the golden age of B&W, and O Brother Where Art Thou for its integrated color perfect post-process.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
Nope. Larry Smith and Kubrick are gods of cinematography.
Perfect framing. Perfect choice of film stocks and equipment. Perfect understanding of lighting, tints, to hint at scenes.
A classic scene in Eyes Wide Shut is the cold bathroom vs. the warm glow of the bedroom, subtly hinting at Cruise's predicament.
The tracking was painstaking.
Its no suprise that this was the longest shoot in film history. It was the most patient and carefully done.
A fitting farewell by the the best visual director of our generation.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dis
|
 |
Las Vegas, Nevada
Feb 2000 time: 21:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by -Jrabbit
OK, you guys -- Ned and Imram -- definitely need a new "deserving an Oscar" thread of your own.
Back on topic --
Hilarious bit on Chicago radio this a.m., saying ROTK may have surpassed Top Gun as the all-time gay subtext movie. Great line, but I almost did a spit-take with my coffee... The funny part was, it was mostly hobbit-driven, where previous speculation I've heard tended to be more about those effeminate elves...
Favorite continuity errors --
1. "Frodo, we have to get you something to wear." Sam and (shirtless) Frodo don oversized orc armor. A short time later, the orc gear is gone and -- ta daa -- Frodo's back in his shirt for the climactic finale.
2. The army of men (6,000 iirc) rides horses from Minas Tirith to the final "if we can just distract them Frodo will have a chance" battle at the black gates. The enemy is called out, and surrounds them in great number. But when the battle is joined -- I swear this is true, but I want to go back and check -- The army of men is on foot! ALL 6,000 HORSES ARE GONE!!!
(Oh, that skampish Gandalf... ) |
just got done seeing it. I never noticed 
I never notice those types of things unless the director points them out in the audio commentary.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|