 |
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:33
|
|
Sava - quote: Berz: Gulf War I was about reinstalling the dictators of Kuwait... liberation my ass...
yes, as a world superpower... the US is more destructive than even the Roman Empire was... stop living in denial |
And the liberation of France and several European countries re-installed a bunch of socialists, so what? We didn't go into Kuwait to suppress a rebellion by the populace to overthrow their dictators, we liberated Kuwaitis from a brutal dictator who invaded their country. Do you think the Kuwaiti people would have been better off under Saddam? If not, count that as a liberation. If the Kuwaiti dictators were smaller versions of Saddam, I would have had another reason to oppose Gulf War I.
OBoris - quote: Dozens? Hmmmm... I'd say at best half that number, and even then consider that most liberations were half hearted. And probably twice were actually enslaved. If we compare the post-Stalin Soviet Union with the US, I think the USSR showed more restraint and commited less crimes. |
Well, since I didn't say how many dozen, how could you say half of that? Let's see, most of Europe including what the Soviets "liberated" from the Nazis (1 or 2 dozen), another dozen or so in East Asia, and perhaps another dozen in other parts of the world in addition to all those countries the Axis would have conquered before the weight of the world came crashing down on their venture even if the US stayed out of the war. And all Sava can do is complain about the US removal of Saddam? And who did the US enslave? Oh yeah, you equate capitalism with slavery... Of course, we aren't hanging around running elections in these countries so that is inaccurate even if we accept your equation as valid.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Alex
|
 |
Brasil
Mar 1999 time: 02:33
|
|
oh, so many posts... my connection went down for a few hours, so i couldn't post here...
well, the article wrongly says that it was a "law" passed by a Brazilian federal judge. it was actually a ruling, in response to a request made by the Public Ministry (some sort of "General Attorney"). but since Julier Sebastião da Silva is a federal judge, his rulings are applicable to all national territory, that's why Americans were being fingerprinted and photographed in São Paulo and in Rio de Janeiro.
it was obviously a retaliatory measure, and, according to the judge, was something backed up by international law and diplomacy. he said he didn't want to cause any diplomatic incidents, but he is questioning why Brazilians have to be submitted to such security measures in US while other foreigners don't have to.
it may be ruinous to our tourism, yes, but i don't think so. most people don't really care about that, they just want the process to be quicker and less confusing (unfortunately, our Federal Police -- which is in charge of airport security -- doesn't have the numbers to really enforce that ruling).
most of our liberal media is supporting the measure, saying that we cannot be submitted to such humiliation and to be treated like criminals in the US.
but the Federal Government is considering to appeal from that ruling (sorry if these are not the technical terminology in English).
i can tell you something: you won't be able to find terrorists among native Brazilians.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Oncle Boris
|
 |
Once in a brown moon
Aug 2001 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Berzerker
OBoris -
Well, since I didn't say how many dozen, how could you say half of that? Let's see, most of Europe including what the Soviets "liberated" from the Nazis (1 or 2 dozen), another dozen or so in East Asia, and perhaps another dozen in other parts of the world in addition to all those countries the Axis would have conquered before the weight of the world came crashing down on their venture even if the US stayed out of the war. And all Sava can do is complain about the US removal of Saddam? And who did the US enslave? Oh yeah, you equate capitalism with slavery... Of course, we aren't hanging around running elections in these countries so that is inaccurate even if we accept your equation as valid. |
There was no altruism in the Marshall plan. The reconstruction of Europe was part of the Cold War. America needed their former economic partners back on track, that's for sure. And I don't think the US could have imposed their conditions on the French or the British like they can with today's poor countries. Defeating Nazi Germany was sure a nice thing to do. But would the US have done it if it didn't fit their interests? Nope. It took Pearl Harbor and Germany's DOW to finally shake the public opinion. No country has ever been altruistic in its foreign policy, and the US doesn't escape that rule.
And about the 'liberated' countries in East Asia, I wonder what you're talking about. Are you mentioning Kissinger's actions that lead to Pol Pot? Or the Vietnam war, which was not about destroying the country to gain a political edge. Oh! I get it! You're talking about Suharto, the human rights advocate!
Then, we could always say the US saved South America by eradicating the Sandinists or putting Pinochet in power.
True, the Cold War was waged everywhere and it was disgusting, both by what the commies and the US did. Neither was any better and that's my point. (In fact, since the communists were defeated at many places even though they had popular support, I suspect the US has been more efficient in funding the right groups at the right time).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
Fingerprints and Photographs, OH MY!I can't believe some of you are so petty that you'll use something like this to appropriate and belittle the holocaust in string equation.
Oh how horrific! They made me give fingerprints and have a photograph taken upon entrance to the country. I feel so VIOLATED - this isn't what a government should be able to do to a human being while entering their country!
Let those Brazilian or American ****s take my picture later this year. I'm not a terrorist, and therefore have nothing to fear - less a rare and short mix up which SIMPLY HAPPENS upon initiation of a new system. Glady we have whining hacks to blow such up to a "human rights abuse" echoing the magnitude of Nazi Germany.
How talented. Honestly
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
Is it equally sillies to say that we're talking about FINGERPRINTS AND A PHOTOGRAPH? "But where will they stop?!" is a little bit an unimiginative panic, regarding discussion on the present.
You're talking about microchips in babies. I mean wow.. just absolutely WOW. Argue the present issues, and the present means. When they start proposing to graft people with barcodes and magnetic collars, then you can argue about the barcodes and magnetic collars.
Otherwise, go back to your 43rd viewing of the Matrix and/or post-apocolyptic cyber dice games. People shouldn't be here to talk several centuries ahead in fear of every minute change on the verge, it's the changes themselves and the now that matters.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oncle Boris
And about the 'liberated' countries in East Asia, I wonder what you're talking about. Are you mentioning Kissinger's actions that lead to Pol Pot? Or the Vietnam war, which was not about destroying the country to gain a political edge. Oh! I get it! You're talking about Suharto, the human rights advocate!
Then, we could always say the US saved South America by eradicating the Sandinists or putting Pinochet in power.
True, the Cold War was waged everywhere and it was disgusting, both by what the commies and the US did. Neither was any better and that's my point. (In fact, since the communists were defeated at many places even though they had popular support, I suspect the US has been more efficient in funding the right groups at the right time). |
Wow, that's very generous of you to equate the crimes of communism with those of the US during the Cold War. Especially since as you say communism was more popular but nonetheless failed. I wasn't fooled by those thousands of people cheering the destruction of the Berlin wall, or the hundreds of thousands of refugees who risked their lives to cross that wall, or make their way to Hong Kong etc. It was only due to the limitless resources of the USA that propoganda on that scale can occur. Ditto the numerous people I've known personally in the West who managed to escape Hungary, Poland, Soviet Union, East Germany, China, Vietnam, Cambodia, Cuba, Nicaragua etc. Each one with a convincing "back story" which they managed to stick to in some cases for decades. Imagine how much such a large group of frankly excellent deep cover agents must have cost the U.S. It makes the Marshall Plan look like lunch money in comparison.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|