 |
|  |
 |
|
molly bloom
|
 |
Lundenwic
Oct 2001 time: 15:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
What it shows is that the Europeans are downright uncivilized compared to, for example, the Chinese and Japanese or even us Americans. |
Yes, Ned. I think American settlers were enjoying 'Lebensraum' long before Hitler was born, and those Indians didn't go on paid vacations, or end up in holiday homes in Palm Beach or Santa Barbara.
The Japanese quite happily worked millions of fellow Asians to death in South-East Asia and Indonesia and China in the guise of 'liberating' them. They also quite happily massacred Filipinos, mainland Chinese and Singaporean civilians- systematically, not accidentally.
Japanese soldiers indulged in cannibalism and mutilation of Allied servicemen, not out of necessity, but by choice.
The American policy in the repression of the Phillippines post-Spanish American War, doesn't stand up to much moral scrutiny either. It seems that to liberate the Filipinos once the Spanish were defeated, they had to kill quite a lot of them.
Odd way of freeing them....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
Well I guess it takes one to know one.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Ned, please. Every country occupied by Japan has plenty of records of civilian massacres carried out by the IJA. This head-in-the-sand denial goes beyond mere trolling of Europeans and looks more like a vendetta based in lunacy. I've noticed you've ignored specifics and just reiterated baseless assertions. |
Boris, there were incidents, of course, with the IJA. We had My Lai in Vietnam. There were incidents such as Wounded Knew with the Indians. But these were exceptions, and not the rule.
I have never before heard that the IJA killed 5 million enemy civilians during the war. (BTW, does anyone know the number of German civilians massacred by the British? I bet it is also in the millions.)
In Europe, during WWII, it seems that each army was intent on killing as many civilians of the other side as possible. This went on even after the war ended to millions of displaced Germans.
And, just what was going on under Milosevic?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Stop being so defensive. |
But I am agreeing with you, Ned.
Boy, the US seems to bethe last refuge for right-thinking people, dont you agree?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Patroklos
To Tingkai,
You keep asking for examples, I keep giving them. Find me a source that has as mouch respect as these ones, that says what you want.
The Fall of Berlin 1945
by Antony Beevor
Viking Press, Hardcover - 512 pages (May 2002)
You can actually read any book on WWII that has accounts of tactical level combat with a Waffen SS unit to find acts of bravery, fair play, or chivalry. This happens to be the one I am reading at the moment and it is chalk full of it. |
Well I've just read Berlin - The Downfall 1945. How in the world can you read it and concluded that the Waffen SS were "sometimes chivalrous."
Beevor clearly shows that the insanity of Nazis and their willingness to bring Germany down in flames. He cites numerous examples of the SS shooting their own people: civilians and ordinary soldiers. I cannot recall Beevor mentioning examples where the Waffen SS were chivalrous.
You claim that the Waffen SS were "sometimes chivalrous" yet refuse to provide any facts to support that claim. I challenge you to quote some examples of SS chivalry from Beevor's book.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
Before any of you think this cannot happen in the US, look at the lynchings from post-civil war through the 1920's. They are pretty horrific, though not a systemic genocide but a "terror", almost Stalinesque, perpetrated against American citizens.
Try listening to today's rhetoric against gays. If you think that's fringe, read the 1986 Supreme Court decision, I can't remember the name, thankfully gotten rid of last year. That was written by the most powerful people in the country.
A decade ago, while living the Buckeye portion of Ohio (south) where you have a heavy Christian fundamentalist component, I had a young lady who was a friend. I'd had to chill out after I'd gotten engaged, she wanted a menage with me and my finacee (now wife), and my finacee didn't want to share. I found it amusing, my finacee did not, so that was that.
I ran into the young lady a couple of years later, visibly upset. It seems one of the local right-wing religious types had told her that we should put your kind (the young lady was bi, with a very heavy lesbian leaning and vocally active in the gay rights movement) in camps, as in internment. I looked at her (she was a definite left-wing liberal) and asked her what she thought I would do if that happened. She replied that she thought I'd get my guns (cringe, I'm a hunter and have long arms, but that's OK) and get them out, maybe to Canada. We talked a little and I had a liberal convert to the right to bear arms .
It got me thinking, about Schindler, the sheriffs and deputies who got killed down south trying to stop lynchings, the Waffen SS commander who got restationed to Denmark after being in Russia and who was instrumental in minimizing the affects of the Holocaust on Denmark's Jews (a footnote in a book on Ribbentrop, I cannot recall his name off hand, and they still tried and convicted him on war crimes), etc. It's not surprising how many people cooperate, or do nothing because it's "safe", or that they don't want to be at risk. I think all the citations here show that ANY society can quickly devolve in that direction if basic human rights protections are subverted, or never existed.
What needs to be stressed are those individuals who DID not go along, and courageously fought back, either directly though that often gets you killed in these circumstances, or indirectly to varying degrees of affect, whether Schindler or the caucasians in the southern states helping the underground railroad. IMHO what we need to teach are children are those examples, heros and martyrs who took the right course. It is more important to set examples on the right thing to do, rather than avoiding doing the wrong thing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:33
|
|
NYE, I was genuinely shocked by Milosevic. I thought that Europe had left that sort of barbarity behind it.
I am similarly appalled by WWII. The conduct of so many was completely uncivilized. It was not just the Germans. It was many others as well.
Why is the question we have to ask. Europe was supposed to be a civilized place. The whole of Europe was Christian and most of it lived under the rule of law and had so for hundreds of years.
I can only contrast the relatively civilized conduct of most Americans to the conduct of virtually everyone else.
I have never heard of barbarities by the Chinese on the Japanese. I assume there were incidents, but nothing more.
I also have not heard of any attrocities commited by the Italians or Indians or French.
But the Germans and many of their allies, the Russians and their allies and the British were well into mass slaughter/rape of the other's civilians.
Last edited by Ned on 16-01-2004 at 12:30
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
But the Germans and many of their allies, the Russians and their allies and the British were well into mass slaughter/rape of the other's civilians. |
What in the world are you talking about?
During WWII, the British did not slaughter/rape like the Germans did. The Brits never had concentration camps akin to the German ones. The Brits did not murder POWs like the Germans and Russians did. Brit soldiers did not commit mass rapes like Russian troops did in 45. The Brits did not murder civilians for political reasons liek the Germans and the Russians.
Your comparison of the Brits to the Germans and the Russians is simply stupid.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|