 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:33
|
|
I wouldn't be suprised if this wasn't just an attempt to get us to drop the wall.
I'm in favor of a tech/luxury embargo (hell we are already not trading them techs). But any unit response is a bit too much at this point. Though we could drop a couple galleons of cavs I suppose on the west side to divert attention.
This just smells of Vox's second arrival on Bob, ie a setup.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:33
|
|
Ok. Discussing possibilities is fine. Just don't commit us to didly squat yet (I know you wouldn't, but GoW can be pushy sometimes. See how the ill-fated NAP came to be).
But I've very little desire to help GoW and/or ND militarily. Let me explain a bit further:
That's the area GoW are strongest, and we are weakest. They have a large fastmover force, and have Leos. ND is more balanced, but they too are militarily strong and capable. The two of them should have enough military power to seriously damage Lego if they can find a spot to land (I'd be SHOCKED if Lego isn't covering their coastline, at least the one facing Bob).
Without dropping the sea wall (which is not an option), we can only commit a token force, unless we really poured our economy into building horsies and upgrading to Cav. 30 cavalry? Assuming we use what knights we have on hand + some horsies to come up with that number, it's still going to be expensive. Plus we need the transport capacity to deliver those 30 Cavalry... and defensive units to cover the cav (better 10 muskets + 20 cav than just 30 cav). That's 8 galleons. Plus we would need some cover for the galleons. Lots of stuff we don't have right now.
OUR strength is our economy, which is humming along nicely now that we've regeared it for peace. It is with that we can hurt Lego (by trading with the Bobians but not with them, and possibly by getting a tech lead and snatching key wonders out from under them).
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cort Haus
|
 |
London
Apr 2002 time: 05:33
|
|
OK, all points understood. It would put a dent in our economic program and could be tricky to arrange, and we probably wouldn't want to do it. We can still calculate the price of this 'contingency', though.
We have 24 Knights, (12 spare), and 5 galleys. If RP complete their wall we get another dozen units available. We'd need to build six pikes/cats to make up the numbers on the wall, three more galleons and at maybe six frigates. Maybe about 3 turns-worth of empire production in shield terms.
Then the cash : 20 Knights-to-Cav, 10 Pike-to-Musket and 5 Galleys-to-Galleons. What's that? 1200g? About 3 turns of research time.
So three turns of output is a rough price-tag for sending 10 Muskets and 20 Cav to Legoland. That's the supply side.
On the demand side, the kind of scenario that could warrant such a venture might be if Lego was bogged down on one side by GoW / ND, and we turned up on another. The destruction of Legopolis with Bach & Sistine would be quite a prize. This may be an impractical idea, but I just wanted to explore the idea a bit and maybe put a plan/idea on the shelf, so-to-speak.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cort Haus
|
 |
London
Apr 2002 time: 05:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by vmxa1
I think that any invasion that did not fail could lead to Lego being eliminated. I would think any invasion of Bob or Stormia would go the same way. The defenders either drive the invaders out or lose everything.
In that case, Lego would probably be split largely between the Bobians. So how much land could we afford them to have?
The best scenario right now for us is an invasion of Lego that fails and does not include us in a large way. cost all three parties lots of headway.
|
Yes. Ideally, Legopolis with its two happy-wonders and a couple of other core cities would be destroyed after a bloody conflict and a rails/rifles stalemate would follow. If the invasion succeeded completely and destroyed Lego, the GoW/ND alliance could legitimately declare a joint domination victory. Even if the other teams did not accept, it's checkmate, and only a matter of time before ourselves and the minor teams are eliminated. If only two allies are left standing and declare victory, who's left to deny them that?
We don't play for grudges, but there would be at least be some satisfaction for GS to see Lego destroyed before ourselves by the alliance they sided with against us.
Last edited by Cort Haus on 09-02-2004 at 23:13
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tall Stranger
|
 |
Northern Virginia
Nov 2002 time: 00:33
|
|
I, too, am in the "highly skeptical" camp. That said, however, I see no major downside to playing along, provided some basic security measures are implemented. Think Machiavelli.
If they are trying to play a game with us, the best thing we can do is to act as though they've succeeded. I'd recommend we start by "seeking more information." Much of it is stuff they'd expect us to ask, such as:
1) "What type of support are you expecting from us? After all, your highly capable military forces have largely decimated our noble armies. We are now a peace-loving people."
2) "What do we stand to gain from such an effort?"
3) "What are you prepared to contribute to such an effort?"
4) "How do you plan to surprise Lego, since it is highly likely that they will have a sea wall and pickets to detect any planned attack?"
The point here is that, if they are indeed trying to get us to lower our defenses, we are better off pretending to believe them. If we call them on their deception, we lose any chance to foil their plan.
In fact, by seeming interested but wary ("We'd like to believe you, but UnO's comments that he wants to remove us from the game make us a bit leery of trusting you."), we may get them to reveal more than they'd like. It may also open the door to a way to turn the tables on them and deal ourselves back into the game.
Just a thought.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:33
|
|
Yeah, I think we should string them along for a while (who knows when the save will be fixed, wish we knew more), after all they have done that to us this whole game.
what is RP's eta for navigation? they could devastate lego with their conquistadors....
I would love to see a beachhead established on lego with GoW/nd taking/razing maybe 4 or 5 ciites before being driven off.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:33
|
|
It was sharpe, though I couldn't find where he explicitly said it (need a search function for private forums). Sharpe quit the team, IIRC cause he was fed up with the iron grip on Vond
Vondrack has got to be the biggest weasel around here. Goddamn man, admit that you lied to us or at least deliberately misled us to get us off the island. sheesh. Very clintonesque (and I loved Clinton) "how close is close". GIVE ME A FRICKING BREAK
OOOOHHH god I'm pissed at him and want to lay into him in that thread.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|