 |
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by skywalker
So it is illegal to try and convince children of things? |
At the public school, yes. The public school is supposed to be devoid of political, religious or commercial advocacy. Besides, as I try to convince people on the streets to vote for the Communist Party, I am forbidden by the law to try convincing those younger than 16 (I'm for a lower age of consent in this regard, but I'd find it highly amoral to proselytize children).
Now, that's the principle, which dates back to the begginings of the Third Republic, and I think it is obsolete in many regards: I'd prefer an approach based on age, rather than based on the attendance of public school. Such as forbidding people outside of the family to proselytize their system of values and beliefs on a very young and influencable kid.
To me, banning headscarves in senior highschool is preposterous wrt proselytism. At this point, kids are supposed to be mature enough not to get swayed by this.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Akka
|
 |
In front of my computer.
Nov 2001 time: 06:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by skywalker
You're actually wrong here - the state isn't being neutral with respect to religion, it's SUPPRESSING religion. Being neutral is no advocacy or suppression of any religious view, including atheism. |
No, that is passivity.
A neutral zone considering a particular point, is a zone where this particular point is ABSENT. Well, that's the point. Absent.
And saying "keep your beliefs to yourselves while in neutral zone" is not suppressing nor segrating. It's just saying "keep it to yourselves while in this zone".
quote: What's wrong with "proselytising"? It is merely a negative term for trying to convince others of your point of view. If an action is specifically disruptive to the classroom, or ends up with physical harm to a student or property, then yes, it should be stopped, but not because it is "proselytising". |
Well, if you don't see the problem with proselytism in school, then I suppose you just can't understand the point to have a neutral state. Guess the concept is lost to you, and then I can hardly make a point about it.
After all, if someone doesn't find any harm in propaganda, it's a bit hard to make him understand that unbiased news are good...
quote: Why don't they have anything to do with school? Students most of all need to learn the importance of independent thought, not be spoon-fed government propoganda. |
Funny, someone who blame government propaganda because a point that is precisely aimed at preventing propaganda 
Guess you defeat your own argument here. Thanks.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
quote: Originally posted by skywalker
How is that kid supposed to learn values? | From his family
quote: SOMEONE has to teach values to the kid. Why not expose children to many beliefs, and let them CHOOSE? | You believe very young children can make an informed choice. I don't. And remember, I'm not speaking about highschoolers here, I'm speaking about 4-7 year olds. |
so high schools will allow u to wear religious garments because they are not of the proper age?
or are u just artificially limiting ur argument.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
With regard to proselytism, yes, I think highschoolers can take it, and thus see religious garments. |
but the french gov't disagrees?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
The French are fine by me.
Sure, we've had lots of rows in the 100 years of the Entente Cordiale... but doesn't democracy thrive on debate and different ideas?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Why don't the French just ban religion? It would be fairly clear where they stand then.
As it is, they're just banning religious children.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Akka
The point is not to ban religion, the point is to keep religious opinions out of school.
Is this a concept that nobody can understand ? |
removing the free flow of information is a concept we are accustomed to.
we are generally against it.
so unfortunately tho u'd like that "no1 understood u." they actually do understand and merely disagree.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|