 |
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tripledoc
This revulsion towards the amusing Jar Jar Binks is something I never understood. What exactly is wrong with him? I mean basicly he is modelled on Goofy, the Disney character.
I think also there is a little bit of xenophibia in there, since he speaks something which could vaguely be interpreted as Rastafarian.
Also he likes bufoonery, and behaves in an anti-authoritain manner. This does not mix well with the marine barracks humour most well adapted and socialized people tend to identify themselves with. The latter is the kind of humour that takes Freuds conclusion that humour is subliminated sadistic impulses to its logical extreme. In short Jar Jar Binks is every Marine sergants nightmare.
His total inablity to understand technical details of course also infuriates the modern consumer. So in a sense he is a bit anti-capitalistic.
From a feminist point of view it is also easy to see why Jar Jar Binks would infuriate males, but I won't get into that. |
People who are into scifi are familiar with the concept of Alien Cultures. The other. The ones with motivations you may or may not understand. Jar Jar Binks comes off as an attempt to make a childish movie more kid friendly. It fails.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
I thought there was some good scenes and ideas in Star wars one and two. The race and the battle droids in one were inventive. The clone factory was fascinating and the final battle in two was entertaining. The dialogue was perhaps not so good. Except for Ben Kenobi's and the Emperors lines. But then again they were already fully fledged characters.
Maybe George Lucas should have started all over and invented an entirely new universe. Or should have put the ideas of one and tow into one more tightly construced movie.
I would also like to point out the other Science fiction franchises. Namely Planet of the Apes, which was perhaps not so good in the latest installment. And the Alien Saga which is also somewhat controversial. Dune sadly never got off the ground. Neither did the Cyperpunk ideas by William Gibson. Matrix fizzled out.
Which makes me think that someone needs to put an entirely new concept to the screen.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
The first Matrix movie is better than all the ST/SW movies.
12 monkeys is better.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
I never understood 12 monkeys. What was the idea again. Something with timetravel and a deadly virus, and then it all went up in smoke.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
Bruce Willis character travels back in time to gather intel to either get a sample of or stop a virus from decimating the human race. He falss in love in the process or was he always in love with a certain woman. In the end his mission was a success because he found the person responsible and the woman on the plane was sent to get a sample. I hope this does not give too much away.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
The ultimate Space battle battle would be something like Midway, The London Blitz, Iwo Jima, Kursk, and the Fall of Berlin in one cut.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
B5 had many great space battles
|
|
|  |
 |
|
FS*
|
|
I think par tof the problem with the 'new' Star Wars is the lack of charisma. There were strong characters based on the old serials. Maybe it was just the times, but it seemed everyone was a fan of one of the main characters, whether it was Han, Leia, Vader or whomever.
No one in the new franchise comes off with any strong dramatic believability. The effects are great, and there's a story there, but the acting is almost negligible.
Even Mark Hamill had more range than the guy playing Vader.... and that's not saying much. Can't even recall his name.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
What about the battle scenes in the new Battlestar Galactica movie. If there was a battle in space it would be closer to Battle Star Galactica than Star Wars or Star Trek.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
Okay, What about Space above and beyond.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
defi****ingnitely star TREK
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|