 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Myrddin
News reports that the Spanish authorities have arrested 3 Algerian and 2 'Indians' based on a suspuscious bag found on one of the trains
I'm guessing that they're not members of ETA |
Not to be nitpicking it was 3 Moroccans and 2 Spaniards of Indian descent.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Lawrence of Arabia
|
 |
of the Gulag Archipelago
Apr 2001 time: 06:34
|
|
listen to yourself for a second - did i say it was right to kill government officials? no. but that means they dont kill wantonly, and they are smart. this operation reeks of alqaeda and heres why. (using logic, which might be tuff for you, but try to follow)
1. Timing: right before elections. If done by ETA, backlash against them. If done by Al Qaeda, backlash against them, and payback for spains support of war on terror.
analysis: ETA have everything to lose by bombing before elections. AQ has everything to gain. first, it brings the war on terror to the homefront and brings average civilians into the mix. secondly, it terrorizes people. and third, it can get some people to decide that its better to get out of Iraq and war on terror.
Conclusion: AQ did it
2. Style: wonton destruction, akin to WTC I, WTC II, Embassy I, EMbassy II, Cole. ETA has never done attacks like this (except for one mistkae), sometimes calls in, and takes responsibility. Al qaeda has track record of large scale attacks
analysis: again, ETA has much more to lose. they dont engage in attacks like this because it is counterproductive - it gets people angry at them, which is not what they want. furthermore, they have not on purpose killed hundreds of cilivians. this fits into Al qaedas style
conclusion: its al qaeda.
3. Location: Spain. Spain has historically (and dont think they dont know their history) been the slayers on islam. (reconquista, inquisition)
analysis: by itself, doesnt mean much. but with the other evidence, makes it much more clear
conclusion: a wash. ETA and Al qaeda are just as likely to attack in Spain.
now lets look at the rhetoric and politicisation of this event. all government officials quick to claim it was ETA, and not al qaeda. now why would they do that? could if be because they have a vested interest that if its ETA then everyone will vote against them? even the spanish government understands that the ETA would be slitting their own throats if they did an attack like this. why do you think the interior minister was jizzing all over the place screaming that its ETA? to answer that, all you gotta do is ask "what does every first term party want?" a second term.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|