 |
|  |
 |
|
Oncle Boris
|
 |
Once in a brown moon
Aug 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by OliverFA
Officials like teachers, painters, students, housewifes, plumbers... I suppose that all your other affirmations are as truth as this one... 
|
Cites? From what I know of the ETA, those people were never the targets, but victims of collateral damage. Which is still tragic, BTW, but points in the direction that the ETA does not willingly target civilians for the sake of it.
quote:
Which accusations? Aznar didn΄t named ETA. And by the way, I remember again that the other parties also did. Specially important is the declaration of Ibarreche (The head of Basque government) on the morning of Thursday balming ETA. You can say that I lie or you can and watch the video. If you can stand knowing the truth of course.
|
Remarkably, the Security council did, as did Spanish ambassadors in the world. I guess Aznar has been a victim of their boldness?
quote:
How many things can you do with explosives? A children party? A neighbourhood celebration? Refurnishing a building? |
Plant bombs in a building and warn the police, as they usually do. Not in the train.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002 time: 06:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oncle Boris
Cites? From what I know of the ETA, those people were never the targets, but victims of collateral damage. Which is still tragic, BTW, but points in the direction that the ETA does not willingly target civilians for the sake of it. |
They did target all this kind of people. Again. you just need to go to the library and look for old newspapers for it.
Isn΄t surprising for such a vocal member like you to be so much misinformed? Please inform yourself better before saying anything so much vocally.
And even if ETA didn΄t target civillians... a life is a life. And officials are still innocent.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
JCG
|
 |
between a rock and a hard place
Feb 2002 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jamski
Is it not already 90% sure that the whole "blame ETA" thing was a cover-up by the Francoesque Spanish Govenment?
-Jam |
Yes....
But being honest, one can't really call it a "cover-up" in the full sense of the word, considering that the government and the police began to release information pointing to AQ quite soon after their earlier declarations (in other words, with plenty of time before the elections), and even in those first declarations there are remarks where they say stuff like: "ETA is (was) our main suspect, but we are still going to pursue all the other possibilities in the investigation as it progresses".
So they really didn't close the door on AQ, they just spoke too soon about ETA, admittedly knowing that would be the possibility that'd benefit them the most for the elections....and then they began to realize their mistake and backtracked.
So one could still call it a "cover-up", but a very sloppy and premature one that was gradually aborted.
Btw, about ETA's "modus operandi"...like one Spanish commentator said on tv, one can't really pretend to argue that ETA has always played or will forever play 100% by those so-called "rules" (or actually generalizations), as there have been times when they have not done so. Their "record" did indeed make their responsability quite unlikely, but not impossible.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:34
|
|
I will repeat my observation from thread one: the news of this attack was the very first thing I hear when I woke up, which was 7am Eastern ST on the day it happend-it was the first thing cause my alarm is the radio going on unto a news station. The very first thing I heard, after the announcer saying hundreds of people have been killed by simultanous bombings (and at this point, no number was given, I though that meant 2, not 10), the Spanish Government blames ETA for the attacks- and just like I said on the previous thread-it struck me how the government could be saying it was ETA so quickly, when the MO (simultanoues bombings) was something that struck me as Al Qeada.
Now, DD keep positng evidence that woul posit some links to ETA-fine. The question was, why so soon? It took a couple of days after 9/11 for the consensus to become solid behind the notion Osama was behind the attacks. The Spanish government could have said little the firt day as to whom they thought had done it, and all the accusation coming out now would not be able to stick. But I do think the government was too quick to blame ETA-I don;t think it was for calcualted political reasons-I think they wanted it to be ETA and not Al Qaeda, and shot their mouths off too early.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Seems PP is still ahead on the polls but only slightly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
τηλεοπτικό δίκτυο Telecinco δίνει 40,6% στο Λαϊκό Κόμμα και 38,3% στους Σοσιαλιστές, ενώ η κρατική τηλεόραση 41,4% στους Σοσιαλιστές και 36 % στο Λαϊκό Κόμμα και το Radio SER, 40,5% στους Σοσιαλιστές και 39,5% στο Λαϊκό Κόμμα.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
telecino: 40,6% to PP 38,3% to socialists
state TV: 41,1 socialists, 36 PP
radio ser 40,5 socialists, 39,5% PP
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|